Cervical Stabilization Exercises on Bruxism and Sleep Quality

June 30, 2025 updated by: Emine Nur Demircan, Hacettepe University

Investigation of the Effect of Cervical Stabilization Exercises on Bruxism and Sleep Quality

Bruxism and temporomandibular joint dysfunction are common conditions today. The applications in the treatment of these disorders are limited. When the literature is examined, it has been determined that cervical stabilization exercises, which are frequently applied in physical therapy clinics for neck problems, have not been applied to bruxism before. For this reason, in this study, we will examine the effects of cervical stabilization exercises targeting deep cervical muscles on bruxism.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bruxism is the grinding or clenching of teeth, which is characterized by the fixed or forward movement of the mandible that occurs repeatedly during the day, including muscles such as the masseter and temporal muscles. Correct determination of the etiology plays a key role in the treatment of bruxism. There are many suggestions in the literature for the treatment of bruxism. The most preferred of these are: providing training for the person to quit harmful habits, physiotherapy applications for muscle relaxation, botox applications, drug treatments, giving the patient an occlusal splint, etc. Since bruxism is a functional problem of muscular origin, it is possible to talk about muscle-oriented exercise applications in its treatment. As a result of studies in which exercises are frequently prescribed for the chewing muscles and temporomandibular muscles, it has been determined that bruxism symptoms are relieved and functional gains are achieved. It has also been stated that muscle pain and activity, mouth opening, oral health, anxiety, stress, depression and head posture can be improved in individuals with bruxism with physiotherapy approaches. When the literature is examined; There are studies investigating the effects of physiotherapy applications in bruxism. In addition, although it is known that the neck region is affected in bruxism, causing the head to tilt forward and increased muscle activation in the neck region, no study has been found investigating the effects of specific cervical region stabilization exercises. This study was planned considering the effects of cervical stabilization exercises on correcting cervical posture and providing muscle activation balance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kağıthane
      • Istanbul, Kağıthane, Turkey, 34406
        • Istanbul Kent University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with full dentition including 2nd molars
  • Patients without facial asymmetry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic and/or neuromuscular diseases
  • Patients with orofacial pain not caused by bruxism
  • History of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery or injection
  • Use of any medical drugs affecting the muscular system
  • Patients with developmental deformities or a history of surgery in the maxillofacial region (facial trauma history, resection history, etc.)
  • TMJ pathologies (major condylar changes seen on panoramic radiographs)
  • History of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy
  • Ongoing orthodontic treatment
  • Use of removable prosthesis
  • Inflammatory connective tissue diseases
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • Local skin infection over the myofascial area
  • Patients who have undergone root canal treatment
  • Reluctance to take responsibility for the work

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
The cervical region is one of the most affected regions of the musculoskeletal system due to the intensive proprioceptors. Studies have shown that many position sense proprioceptors are over the deep group cervical muscles such as longus colitis and longus capitis. The deep group cervical muscles, which perform a dynamic ligament function, have an important role in maintaining the stability of the spine as well as the proprioceptive sense. In particular, proprioceptive receptors, which are commonly found in the deep suboccipital muscles; There are cervical and reflex connections with vestibular, visual and postural control systems.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
The cervical region is one of the most affected regions of the musculoskeletal system due to the intensive proprioceptors. Studies have shown that many position sense proprioceptors are over the deep group cervical muscles such as longus colitis and longus capitis. The deep group cervical muscles, which perform a dynamic ligament function, have an important role in maintaining the stability of the spine as well as the proprioceptive sense. In particular, proprioceptive receptors, which are commonly found in the deep suboccipital muscles; There are cervical and reflex connections with vestibular, visual and postural control systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle Activation Evaluation
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Participants' Masseter, Temporal and Trapezius muscle activation will be evaluated with Superficial Electromyography. (Number of Participants estimated 28 individuals)
At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Tongue Pressure Evaluation
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Tongue pressure will be done by oral muscle measurement. (Number of Participants estimated 28 individuals)
At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Evaluation of Sleep Quality
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Since bruxism affects the sleep quality of patients, the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index will be used to evaluate sleep quality. (Number of Participants estimated 28 individuals)
At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mouth Opening Evaluation
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
The amount of mouth opening will be evaluated by adding the vertical coverage amounts of the lower and upper incisors to the distance between the incisal edges of the lower and upper incisors at maximum mouth opening, using a ruler, for pre-treatment, post-treatment and 1 month later follow-up purposes. (Number of Participants estimated 28 individuals)
At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Tongue Range of Motion Ratio Assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment
In the functional tongue tie classification published by Ferrés-Amat et al., the mouth opening with tongue tip to maxillary incisive papillae at roof of mouth (MOTTIP) and the maximum interincisal mouth opening (MIO) ratio (MOTTIP/MIO ratio is defined as "Tongue range of motion ratio - TRMR") will be used to measure functional tongue limitation. In this classification system, it is stated as Grade 1: tongue range of motion ratio >% 80, Grade 2: 50-80, Grade 3: <% 50, Grade 4: <% 25. (Number of Participants estimated 28 individuals)
At baseline, after 6 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Cervical stabilization

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bruxism

Clinical Trials on Cervical spinal stabilization exercise

Subscribe