- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06573983
Fall Risk Identification and Management for Older Veterans (FRIM)
August 15, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Development of a Fall Risk Identification and Management Model for Older Veterans
Falls are a common occurrence among older adults, and Veterans have an even higher risk of falling compared to non-Veterans.
These falls often lead to severe health consequences, including traumatic brain injuries, hip fractures, emergency visits, hospitalizations, and even death.
It is crucial to prioritize fall prevention in order to reduce injuries and enable older Veterans to age comfortably at home.
Although current fall prevention programs in the Veterans Health Administration primarily focus on inpatient care and nursing homes, there is a pressing need to address falls among older Veterans living independently in the community.
The proposed VA-specific Fall Risk Identification and Management (FRIM) model aims to proactively prevent falls in older Veterans who receive primary care, effectively reducing the occurrence of adverse health events associated with falls.
By placing emphasis on prevention rather than reacting after falls have already happened, this initiative seeks to significantly enhance the overall well-being of older Veterans.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Falls among older adults pose a significant risk, leading to life-altering injuries and imposing substantial healthcare costs.
There is a pressing need to develop fall prevention models within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) considering Veterans are more likely to fall than their age-matched non-Veteran counterparts, likely secondary to higher rates of functional impairment and comorbidities.
Extensive research has identified numerous fall risk factors across physical, psychological, pharmacological, and environmental domains.
Further, screening tools and interventions have been developed to identify and manage these risk factors, offering insight on methods to intervene early and prevent falls in older Veterans.
Primary care clinics within the VHA are well-positioned to play a crucial role in preventing falls.
These clinics are frequently visited by older Veterans for routine care and are widely accessible across the country.
However, fall risk assessment is often not included in the standard care provided by VHA primary care clinics, mainly due to barriers like limited time, competing medical priorities, and a lack of training.
Consequently, there is a missed opportunity to address fall prevention.
Therefore, the investigators are developing a personalized multifactorial model called Fall Risk Identification and Management (FRIM) to prevent falls in older Veterans seen within primary care by addressing known barriers that have limited the uptake of other fall prevention models.
Specifically, the FRIM model follows a three-stage process: briefly screening for fall risk during routine primary care visits, conducting telehealth visits to identify specific fall risk factors, and referring Veterans to existing VHA care pathways with established interventions for managing identified risk factors.
The objectives of this CDA-2 are to refine (Aim 1; Phase 1) and assess the feasibility (Aim 2; Phase 2) of the FRIM model in preparation for a future efficacy trial.
The initial phase, Aim 1, focuses on refining the FRIM model by gathering feedback on each care pathway from Veterans and clinicians through qualitative interviews following a small field test.
Additionally, the investigators will assess the impact of each care pathway on fall risk factor assessments.
This phase aims to enhance the model based on the integration of perceptions and outcomes.
Following the refinement of the FRIM model, Aim 2 entails conducting a randomized controlled feasibility pilot study.
This phase will involve the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and candidate efficacy outcomes of the FRIM model while comparing it to VHA standard of care.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
108
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley, PhD
- Phone Number: (303) 949-9304
- Email: Jennifer.Stevens-Lapsley@va.gov
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Alexander J Garbin, PhD DPT
- Phone Number: (563) 340-7121
- Email: Alexander.Garbin@va.gov
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045-7211
- Recruiting
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
-
Contact:
- Alexander J Garbin, PhD DPT
- Phone Number: 563-340-7121
- Email: Alexander.Garbin@va.gov
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alexander J Garbin, PhD DPT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Screens positive for increased fall risk within GeriPACT, or generalPACT as needed, (answers "yes" to any of 3 screening questions)
- 65 years of age and older
- Positive screen on at least two fall risk factor assessments (Aim 1); Positive screen on at least one fall risk factor assessment (Aim 2)
- Access to telehealth
- Availability of an additional adult (e.g., caregiver or family member) to be present during the physical assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy <12 months, as determined by PCP
- Neurological diagnosis (e.g., cerebral vascular accident, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease)
- Moderate cognitive impairment (<13 on telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BLIND) or <18 on MoCA Full administered during clinic visit in the previous 3 months)
- Unstable condition that precludes safe participation in structured exercise (e.g., recent deep vein thrombosis) if expected fall risk factor is physical, as determined by PCP or chart review
- Participation in any intervention components of the FRIM model, with the intention of reducing a FRIM fall risk factor, within the past 2 months
- Currently using a wheelchair for mobilization
- If it is in the opinion of the study staff that the participant would be at an increased suicide risk due to study procedures
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fall Risk Identification and Management Model
Participants will be assessed on four fall risk factors including physical, psychological, pharmacological, and environmental.
If a participant screens positive for a fall risk factor, they will then be referred to an existing VHA care pathway.
The care pathways include: strengthening via physical therapy or Gerofit for physical fall risk, cognitive behavioral therapy via clinical psychology or occupational therapy for psychological fall risk, deprescription via clinical pharmacy for pharmacological fall risk, and home safety modifications via occupational therapy for environmental fall risk.
|
Individuals with physical fall risk will be referred to strengthening interventions available within the VHA.
These may include Physical Therapy or Gerofit (a supervised exercise program).
Individuals with psychological fall risk will be referred psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, which focuses on guided talking.
This can be performed by VHA occupational therapists and clinical psychologists.
Individuals with pharmacological fall risk will be referred to clinical pharmacology for medication reconciliation.
This includes examining the current medication list and deprescribing medications, if appropriate.
Individuals with environmental fall risk will be referred to occupational therapy for home safety assessments and modifications.
This will involve modifying components within the home to reduce potential fall risk factors.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of care
This group will received current standard of care within the Rocky Mountain Regional GeriPACT clinic.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant recruitment
Time Frame: Program start
|
Participant recruitment will be tracked as part of feasibility.
It will be determined as the proportion of Veterans screened as eligible that are recruited.
|
Program start
|
|
Participant retention
Time Frame: Program start - 1 year post baseline
|
Participant retention will be tracked as part of feasibility.
It will be determined as the 1-year retention rate of participants.
|
Program start - 1 year post baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fall risk identification burden
Time Frame: Program start, Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
Fall risk identification burden will be tracked as part of feasibility.
It will be determined as the time to identify fall risk factors during telehealth visit.
|
Program start, Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
|
Fall risk management burden
Time Frame: Program start - Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
Fall risk management burden will be tracked as part of feasibility.
It will be determined as the time to complete fall risk factor management.
|
Program start - Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
|
Theoretical framework of acceptability questionnaire
Time Frame: Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
Acceptability will be measured using an established questionnaire based on the theoretical framework of acceptability.
Responses on the questionnaire range from 1 (did not like, high burden) to 5 (strongly liked, low burden).
|
Program end (average of 12 weeks)
|
|
3 key questions
Time Frame: Program start
|
The 3 key questions include 1) whether the older adult feels unsteady when standing or walking, 2) worries about falling, 3) or has fallen in the past year.
Participant responses of 'yes' or 'no' to each question will be recorded.
|
Program start
|
|
5 times sit to stand
Time Frame: Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
The 5 times sit to stand is a test of lower extremity strength, transitional movements, and balance.
The test is scored based on the time to completed 5 sit to stand movements and is highly predictive of falls and injurious falls.
A higher time indicates worse physical function and greater physical fall risk.
|
Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
|
Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly
Time Frame: Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
This survey is a questionnaire that probes fear of falling and activity restriction of eleven activities.
Fear of falling is scored based on the average worry to perform each activity ranging from 0 (not worried) to 3 (very worried).
Activity restriction is scored by the number of activities that an individuals reports doing less than usual compared to three years ago.
Additional questions probe whether activities are restricted due to fear of falling.
Higher scores indicate greater psychological fall risk.
|
Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
|
Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk (STOPPFall)
Time Frame: Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
Pharmacological fall risk will be identified via the number of medications prescribed on the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in older adults with high fall risk.
The number of medications prescribed will be collected from the participant's medical record.
A higher score indicates more fall risk increasing drugs and greater pharmacological fall risk.
|
Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
|
Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST)
Time Frame: Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
The Home Falls and Accidents and Screening Tool is a questionnaire that assesses 25 potential home fall risk factors (e.g., slippery surfaces, lighting, etc.).
A higher score indicates greater environmental fall risk.
|
Program start, 1 year after intervention end (average of 1.25 years post baseline)
|
|
Unique number of falls.
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Unique number of falls will be measured as a yes/no occurrence of any falls during the study.
This will be measured using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
|
Median cumulative number of falls
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Median number of cumulative falls per Veteran will be collected using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
|
Time to first fall
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Time to first fall is a continuous measure of days to the first fall occurring within the study period.
This will be collected using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
|
Unique number of injurious falls
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Injurious falls will be defined as falls requiring medical attention.
Unique number of injurious falls will be measured as a yes/no occurrence of any injurious falls during the study.
This will be measured using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
|
Median cumulative number of injurious falls
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Injurious falls will be defined as falls requiring medical attention.
Median number of cumulative injurious falls per Veteran will be collected using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
|
Time to first injurious fall
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Injurious falls will be defined as falls requiring medical attention.
Time to first injurious fall is a continuous measure of days to the first injurious fall occurring within the study period.
This will be collected using weekly self-report via the Annie-App as well as using the VA Data Corporate Warehouse.
|
Through study completion (average of 1.25 years)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alexander J Garbin, PhD DPT, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 23, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
August 27, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 17, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 15, 2025
Last Verified
August 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- E5024-W
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The research team intends to share study data that may be requested from other research investigators in a data-sharing agreement provided at the study's end.
Data prepared for distribution under a data-sharing agreement will be further redacted to ensure privacy of study participant identity yet allow analyses to occur by other investigators.
The data-sharing agreement will include requirements to protect participants' privacy and data confidentiality.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
6 months after publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The research team intends to share study data that may be requested from other research investigators in a data-sharing agreement provided at the study's end.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fall Risk
-
Betul Esra CevikCompletedAccidental Fall | Fall Prevention | Fall Risk FactorsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingFall Risk, Fall PreventionEgypt
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingFall Risk, Fall PreventionPakistan
-
Leon BrüllHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinTerminatedFall Risk, Fall PreventionGermany
-
University of PotsdamSwiss Council for Accident Prevention; Prof. Dr. Reto W. Kressig and Dr. Yves...CompletedFall Prevention | Fall Risk FactorsGermany
-
Sara Lúcia Morgado MartinsCompletedFall | Elderly | Fall Risk
-
Ohio UniversityNot yet recruitingAging | Fall Injury Prevention | At Fall RiskUnited States
-
Dilshaad Basrai VadRecruiting
-
Lydia WillemseKU Leuven; Tilburg University; Fontys University of Applied SciencesTerminatedFall RiskNetherlands
-
ZHANG Qing-huaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Strengthening (Physical Therapy, Gerofit)
-
Campbell University, IncorporatedCompletedNeck Pain | StrengthUnited States
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleUnknownMultiple Sclerosis | Overactive Bladder Syndrome | Muscle StrainItaly
-
Universidad Rey Juan CarlosRecruiting
-
University of LahoreRecruitingStroke; ParalysisPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedEffects of Transverse Thoracic Mobilization With and Without Lower Trapezius Strengthening ExercisesMechanical Neck PainPakistan
-
University of FloridaOrthosensor, Inc.Completed
-
Queen's UniversityOttawa Hospital Research InstituteCompletedStress Urinary IncontinenceCanada
-
University of FaisalabadRecruitingScapular DyskinesisPakistan