Optimizing Recruitment to Drive Equitable Research Opportunity in Stroke Rehabilitation Trials in Canada (ORDER-P)

September 23, 2025 updated by: Ada Tang, McMaster University

Optimizing Recruitment to Drive Equitable Research Opportunity in Stroke Rehabilitation in Canada - The ORDER Pilot Study

Stroke is a major health issue in Canada. Stroke affects over 400,000 Canadians, and this number is expected to nearly double by 2038. Research studies in stroke recovery can help us better understand effective rehabilitation treatments and help reduce the burden of stroke. Some groups of people however are commonly not included in stroke studies. For example, it is more common for men to take part in research than women, and people with aphasia (a language impairment commonly seen after stroke) are often excluded from studies. Also, deciding whether to even take part in a research study can be difficult and overwhelming, especially in the early days after stroke, leaving many people to decline to participate. Research has shown that women experience different barriers to participating in stroke research than men. This means that research findings, and the decisions made during stroke care based on these findings, may not reflect the true stroke population. Better ways to help support groups like women and people with aphasia to participate in stroke research are needed, so that study findings will better represent people living with stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Clinical trials in stroke recovery are essential for establishing effective treatments, yet important groups, such as women and people with aphasia, have been consistently under-represented in stroke trials. This limits the generalizability of trial findings and impacts clinical care. Relevant to stroke is the critical time window for neuroplastic change that makes timely enrolment into stroke recovery trials of particular importance. There is a need to develop strategies to efficiently and effectively promote participation into stroke recovery trials.

The Optimizing Recruitment to Drive Equitable Research opportunity in stroke rehabilitation trials in Canada (ORDER) is a pilot "study within a trial" to look at a women-centred, aphasia-friendly recruitment method for a research trial examining whether a medication (Maraviroc), when combined with rehabilitation, can help with stroke recovery ("host trial").

The objectives of this pilot study are to:

  1. Examine the feasibility of a women-centred, aphasia-friendly video and leaflet (ORDER) to supplement traditional detailed participant information letters, support recruitment, and drive enrollment in a stroke recovery randomized trial;
  2. Understand the barriers and facilitators associated with enrolling in the host trial and stroke recovery trials more broadly;
  3. Determine preliminary estimates of effect of ORDER compared to traditional recruitment and enrollment processes

The study will take place at the 10 sites across 6 provinces. The host trial is comparing Maraviroc vs. placebo, combined with 8 weeks of rehabilitation, to improve motor and sensory function.

Potential participants will be identified and approached 5 days to 8 weeks after stroke and randomized to: 1) Supplementing traditional recruitment methods (detailed participant information letter and consent form) with women-centred, aphasia-friendly recruitment video and leaflet (ORDER), or 2) Traditional participant information letter and consent form only (TRAD). For the ORDER arm, the video and leaflet will be saved to a tablet and reviewed together with the Coordinator and potential participant. The Coordinator will engage in discussion about the host trial (prompting questions will be provided), and will offer to leave the tablet with the person, along with printed copies of the leaflet and participant information letter. They will be encouraged to share these materials with their family members or friends who may assist with decision making. For TRAD, the Coordinator will review the information letter and consent form, offer to leave these with the person to view again, and encourage them to share these materials with their family members or friends who may assist with decision making. For both arms, the Coordinator will return in the following days to address any further questions and determine the decision whether to enroll in the trial.

Objective 1 Feasibility will be determined as enrollment (# consented/approached, # women consented/total # consented) and efficiency (# days to decision, # interactions between Site Coordinator and potential participants), with a priori criteria for success for each indicator.

For Objective 2 (Barriers and facilitators), individuals will be invited to complete a survey or participate in key-informant, semi-structured interviews (15 enrolled, 15 declined, 10 Site Coordinators) to share their perceptions of the enrollment and consent process, reason(s) for declining to participate, and recruitment reach (# and characteristics of individuals enrolled through ORDER and TRAD). Purposive sampling will be used to obtain diversity across sex (males, females), gender (men, women, transgender, non-binary), and racial background and will train peer researchers with lived experience to conduct the interviews. The interview guide will be co-developed with our patient partners and the research team. Deductive content analysis of interview transcripts will be conducted and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

For Objective 3 (Preliminary estimates of effect), enrollment and efficiency will be compared between ORDER and TRAD, and Cohen's d and f will be calculated for unadjusted and adjusted analyses to help inform future large-scaled trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Recruiting
        • University of Calgary & Foothills Medical Centre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sean Dukelow, MD PhD
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 2G9
        • Recruiting
        • University of British Columbia & GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Janice Eng, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Courtney Pollock, PhD
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3J5
        • Recruiting
        • Dalhousie University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adria Quigley, PhD
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6C 0A7
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Bayley, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Primary ischemic anterior circulation stroke
  2. Age ≥18 years
  3. ≥5 days but <8 weeks after stroke on the date of medication (Maraviroc or placebo) start
  4. Hemiparesis requiring inpatient rehabilitation
  5. Assistance available for daily rehabilitation training practice and for transportation when needed
  6. Adequate language skills to understand Informed Consent and retain information during daily therapies
  7. At least one of the following: some shoulder abduction with gravity eliminated and visible extension in two or more digits OR visible hip flexion or extension

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pre-stroke modified Rankin score ≥2
  2. Limited resources or illness that will not enable a return to living outside of a facility
  3. History of dementia
  4. History of hepatitis or elevated hepatic transaminases or bilirubin
  5. History of renal insufficiency or creatinine clearance (eGFR) <60mL / min / 1.73m2
  6. Cancer or other chronic illness that makes 1-year survival unlikely or will detract from the ability to carry out exercise and skills practice
  7. Existing pre-stroke serious disabling disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease, severe traumatic brain injury, amputation)
  8. Seizure related to stroke
  9. Acute or chronic epilepsy
  10. Currently taking any of the following anticonvulsant medications: Carbamazepine, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin
  11. Pregnant, breastfeeding, or positive test for pregnancy at baseline
  12. Women of childbearing potential who are not using one highly effective form of contraception or two forms of effective contraception
  13. Known HIV positivity
  14. Currently taking any of the following antifungal and/or antibacterial medications: Ketoconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, Rifampin, Clarithromycin, Rifabutin + Protease Inhibitor
  15. Currently taking St. John's Wort

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Traditional recruitment and enrollment processes (TRAD)
Traditional participant information letter and consent form only (TRAD)
Participants randomized into the traditional recruitment process (TRAD) will be approached by the Site Coordinator for interest in the CAMAROS trial and presented with the standard participant information letter and full informed consent form. The information letter and consent form will be left with the potential participant to view again; the Coordinator will encourage them to share these materials with their family members or friends who may assist with decision making. The Coordinator will return in the following days to address any further questions and determine the decision whether to enroll in the trial.
Experimental: Supported, women-centred and aphasia-friendly recruitment and enrollment process (ORDER)
Supplementing traditional recruitment methods (detailed participant information letter and consent form) with women-centred, aphasia-friendly recruitment video and leaflet (ORDER)

Participants randomized into ORDER will be approached by the Site Coordinator for interest in the host trial. The Coordinator will introduce the trial and share a brief, women-centred, aphasia-friendly, close-captioned video that further describes the trial procedures and an accompanying leaflet.

ORDER recruitment materials will be saved to a mobile tablet. The Coordinator will watch the video together with the potential participant, engage in discussion about the host trial and answer any questions they may have. The Coordinator will offer to leave the tablet with the potential participant, along with printed copies of the leaflet and participant information letter. The Coordinator will encourage them to share these materials with their family members, friends or member of their healthcare team who may assist with decision making. The Coordinator will return in the following days to address any further questions and determine the decision whether to enroll in the trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: From date identified as eligible for the host trial to date of decision (consent or decline)
Each site will record # patients approached, # consented (by men and women), date of initial contact by the Site Coordinator, date of decision (consent or decline), and # interactions between the Site Coordinator and potential participants for ORDER and TRAD.
From date identified as eligible for the host trial to date of decision (consent or decline)
Barriers and facilitators
Time Frame: From date of decision (consent or decline) for host trial to date of survey or interview
Short survey and semi-structured interviews to examine the perceptions of the enrollment and consent process of individuals approached to participate in CAMAROS and Site Coordinators. Reason(s) for declining to participate and recruitment reach (# and characteristics of individuals approached for CAMAROS) will also be recorded.
From date of decision (consent or decline) for host trial to date of survey or interview
Preliminary estimates of effect
Time Frame: From date identified as eligible for the host trial to date of decision (consent or decline)
Each site will record # patients approached, # consented (by men and women), date of initial contact by the Site Coordinator, date of decision (consent or decline), and # interactions between the Site Coordinator and potential participants for ORDER and TRAD.
From date identified as eligible for the host trial to date of decision (consent or decline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Traditional recruitment and enrollment processes (TRAD)

Subscribe