Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women With Multiple Sclerosis

August 28, 2024 updated by: Guadalupe Molina Torres, Universidad de Almeria

Effects of Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of the current randomized clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of virtual reality versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation on the improvement of pelvic floor dysfunctions in women with multiple sclerosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Objective: to determine the effects of virtual reality versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation and muscle activation exercises on the improvement of pelvic floor dysfunctions in women with multiple sclerosis.
  • Methods and Measures: forty five women will be randomly assigned to one of three groups.
  • Intervention: For 8-week, the group 1 will undergo treatment with virtual reality (2/week), the group 2 will receive posterior tibial nerve stimulation (2/week) and the group 3 will receive muscle activation exercises of the pelvic floor.
  • Main Outcome Measures: assessment of pelvic floor muscles function (strength and muscle tone), urodynamic studies, and validated questionnaires data will be collected at baseline, and 1 week after the last therapy application. Mixed-model analyses of variance will be used to examine the effects of the treatment on each outcome measure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • Presence of pelvic floor dysfunction
  • Acceptance participation
  • Not undergoing another physical therapy treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-acceptance of participation
  • Mental illness
  • Interruption of adherence to protocolized treatment sessions
  • Indication of surgical treatment in the pelvic floor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual reality therapy
It will ve placement of virtual reality glasses that will indicate to the patient when to contract the pelvic floor.
Participants receive virtual reality treatment, 8 weeks of treatment/ 2 times a week
Experimental: Neuromodulation of the tibialis posterior
Is placed a external electrode 5 centimeters (cm) above the medial malleolus and 1 cm behind of the tibia and another electrode on the medial aspect of the foot, below the malleolus. The kind of electric current used will be rectangular, biphasic, with a pulse duration of 220 Ps and a frequency of 10 Hz. To avoid habituation to the current, a phase of 20 s stimulation with a 4 s rest phase. The intensity of the current will be inframotor, just below the contraction threshold of the flexor digitorum muscle brevis.
Participants receive neuromodulation of the tibialis posterior nerve8 weeks of treatment/ 2 times a week/ 30 minutes
Experimental: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
Patients will perform Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. Before performing this treatment at home, a session will be held with an expert physiotherapist in pelvic floor who will explain its implementation to the participants of this group.
Participants receive pelvic floor muscle training 5 times a day for 9 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic floor strength
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks] [Safety Issue: No] It is a device for measuring the strength of the pelvic floor, to which a speculum is adapted. measure force in newtons
Pelvic floor strength using a perineometer, a device for measuring the strength of the pelvic floor, to which a speculum is adapted. measure force in newtons
At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks] [Safety Issue: No] It is a device for measuring the strength of the pelvic floor, to which a speculum is adapted. measure force in newtons

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Australian pelvic floor questionnaire:
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
The APFQ is an instrument consisting of 42 questions in 4 domains (bladder, bowel, and sexual function and pelvic organ prolapse). relevant questions and multiplied by 10; thus, the scores range from 0 to 10 for each domain, giving a maximum total score of 40
At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54):
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
The instrument has Likert scales and multiple-choice items. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life). The instrument has Likert scales and multiple-choice items. There is no single overall score for MSQOL-54. Two summary scores - physical health and mental health - can be derived from a weighted combination of scale scores (scale scores range from 0 to 100 and a higher scale score indicates improved quality of life).
At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
Euroqol
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
It is a generic and standardized instrument developed to describe and assess health-related quality of life. The descriptive system contains five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and each of them has three levels of severity (no problems, some problems or moderate problems, and severe problems). In this part of the questionnaire, the individual must mark the level of severity corresponding to their health status in each of the dimensions, referring to the same day they completed the questionnaire. In each dimension of the EQ-5D, severity levels are coded as 1 if the response option is "I have no problems"; with a 2 if the response option is "some or moderate problems"; and with a 3 if the answer option is "many problems." The higher score meaning a worse result.
At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
SF12
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks
This questionnaire contains 12 items that assess 8 aspects of HRQoL: physical dimension, mental dimension, physical function, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, emotional role, social function, and mental health. The SF-12 v2 response options form Likert-type scales that evaluate intensity or frequency. The number of response options ranges between three and six, depending on the item, and each question receives a value that is subsequently transformed into a scale from 0 to 100.
At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guadalupe Molina Torres, Universidad de Almeria
  • Principal Investigator: Jacobo Ángel Rubio-Arias, Universidad de Almeria
  • Principal Investigator: Marta María Córdoba Peláez, Universidad de Almeria

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Virtual reality

Subscribe