Precision Care for Major Depressive Disorder

September 3, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
This study aims to assess whether phenotyping-guided intervention selection is superior to intervention selection without phenotyping guidance (i.e., routine clinician and patient judgment regarding treatment selection) for depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will classify patients seen in the Depression Clinic of the UCSF Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences into one of five phenotypes (subtypes), including: 1) Anhedonia, 2) Cognitive deficits, 3) Stress sensitivity, 4) Anxious distress, and 5) Grief.

After phenotyping, participants will be randomized to receive phenotype-specific intervention (PSI) or care as usual (CAU).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94107
        • Nancy Friend Pritzker Psychiatry Building, University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is able to provide informed consent
  • English speaker
  • 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Disorder
  • The subject meets eligibility criteria for at least one study phenotype as determined by assessments, imaging and/or clinical judgment.
  • PHQ-8 score at baseline of >= 10
  • Scheduled for or completed intake in UCSF outpatient psychiatry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable or untreated medical or psychiatric condition based on clinical assessment by investigator(s)
  • Significant risk of suicidal or violent behavior as determined by clinical judgement
  • In the Investigators' opinion, the subject is not capable of adhering to the protocol requirements, or the subject has a history of poor or suspected poor compliance in clinical research studies, or the subject has a history of poor or suspected poor compliance to antidepressant medication or that study participation is not in their best interest (e.g., different treatment is indicated given their clinical presentation)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anhedonia phenotype: PSI
CAU plan modified to include a trial of pramipexole.
Active Comparator: Anhedonia phenotype: CAU
Unmodified CAU plan.
Experimental: Cognitive deficits: PSI
CAU plan modified to include a trial of methylphenidate (or, if contraindicated: guanfacine).
Active Comparator: Cognitive deficits: CAU
Unmodified CAU plan.
Experimental: Stress sensitivity: PSI
CAU plan modified to include a trial of MBSST. MBSST is an individual psychotherapy delivered approximately weekly for 16 sessions.
Active Comparator: Stress sensitivity: CAU
Unmodified CAU plan.
Experimental: Anxious distress: PSI
CAU plan modified to include a trial of phenelzine (or, if contraindicated: brexpiprazole).
Active Comparator: Anxious distress: CAU
Unmodified CAU plan.
Experimental: Grief: PSI
CAU plan modified to include a trial of CGT.
Active Comparator: Grief: CAU
Unmodified CAU plan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self-Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR-16) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Within-phenotype and across-phenotype contrasts.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
For anhedonia phenotype only.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale Anxious Distress Specifier Subscale (CUDOS-A) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
For anxious distress phenotype only.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
For anxious distress phenotype only.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
For grief phenotype only.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
For cognitive deficits phenotype only.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Within-phenotype and across-phenotype contrasts.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Within-phenotype and across-phenotype contrasts.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self-Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR-16) response
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
50% reduction from baseline score. Within-phenotype and across-phenotype contrasts.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - Self-Report 16-Item (QIDS-SR-16) remission
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks after randomization.
Score < 6. Within-phenotype and across-phenotype contrasts.
Up to 24 weeks after randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew D. Krystal, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Pramipexole

Subscribe