Comparative Evaluation of Care Strategies on Dressing Change-induced Bleeding in Patients With Bleeding Malignant Wounds (Tumoss) (TUMOSS)

April 17, 2026 updated by: Institut Curie

Comparative Evaluation of Care Strategies on Dressing Change-induced Bleeding in Patients With Bleeding Malignant Wounds

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare of bleeding on primary dressing removal between a hemostatic dressing and a non-hemostatic dressing positioned following a first bleeding episode. This assessment will be made on adult patient with a malignant wound ≥ 10cm² who presents with a bleeding episode during a hospital consultation.

The primary endpoint is bleeding caused by the removal of a dressing applied during the first bleeding episode observed in the consultation.Effectiveness will be assessed by the resumption of bleeding during the following day's care, in order to respond to 2 care priorities: stopping the bleeding and avoiding its recurrence.The investigators propose a randomized study, with the choice between hemostatic (Algosteril®) or non-hemostatic (interface, hydrocellular, high-absorbency fiber dressing) being randomized and therefore not dependent on the wound or the care team.

In the proposed research, the investigators will evaluate pain on dressing removal, the stress that a bleeding episode can cause, and quality of life in relation to the malignant wound.

The investigators will observe the frequency of bleeding episodes over 6 months, the local care used and the medical management of these bleeding episodes.

In addition, the investigators will pay particular attention to the patient's entourage, as well as to the caregiver who will be carrying out the care, notably by measuring their stress levels during bleeding episodes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Malignant wounds are the result of the oncogenic process. They may be caused by the initial tumor ulcerating on the skin, or by a secondary localization of the cancer (cutaneous metastasis). They may be external, cavitary or superficial.

The most frequent symptoms are bleeding, odour, pain and exudate. The appearance of these wounds can be impressive for the patient, family and caregivers if they are not used to dealing with this type of wound.

As these wounds are chronic, they need to be managed both in hospital and at home.

A retrospective study carried out at the Institut Curie showed that in 80% of cases, bleeding occurred at the time of treatment.

This bleeding is due to the friable nature of the tissues, which are highly vascularized as a result of tumor angiogenesis. They can therefore bleed easily when the dressing is removed.

The application of an alginate dressing, the only hemostatic dressing reimbursed in towns and cities (in France), seems to increase bleeding on dressing removal, compared with other, non-hemostatic products whose removal is less traumatic (interface, hydrocellular and hydrofiber).

The presence of minor bleeding is not negligible, as it appears to significantly increase the risk of more severe bleeding later on.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Agde, France, 34300
        • EHPAD Laurent Antoine
      • Agde, France, 34300
        • Hôpital Saint-Loup
      • Caen, France, 14076
        • Centre François Baclesse
      • Marseillan, France, 34340
        • EHPAD Claude Goudet
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Chu Saint Eloi
      • Paris, France, 75248
        • Institut Curie
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hopital Tenon
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon
      • Reims, France, 51100
        • CLCC - Institut Godinot
      • Sète, France, 34200
        • Hôpital Saint Clair
      • Sète, France, 34207
        • EHPAD Pergolines
      • Vias, France, 34450
        • EHPAD l'Estagnol

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years and older;
  • Carriers of a malignant wound ≥ 10cm²;
  • Possibility of participating simultaneously in another research study without an exclusion period at the end of the study;
  • Patient having signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under 18 years of age;
  • Non-ulcerated nodule, tumor infiltration;
  • Patient in the terminal phase of their cancer;
  • Patients with a tumor wound that is a cutaneous melanoma;
  • Patient refusing to be managed by a private nurse or hospitalization at home (HAD);
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship (including curatorship);
  • Persons of legal age under court protection;
  • Inability to participate in the study for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Algosteril
control arm (Algostéril® hemostatic dressing): dressing used on the day of the bleeding episode in hospital
hemostatic dressing
Experimental: Other dressings
experimental arm (non-haemostatic dressing): dressing used on the day of the bleeding episode in hospital
Non-haemostatic dressing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of bleeding on primary dressing removal between a hemostatic dressing and a non-hemostatic dressing positioned following a first bleeding episode
Time Frame: Day 1 after bleeding

Bleeding rate on Day 1 of randomization, at the time of dressing change during a first bleeding episode.

A bleed will be considered as a dressing removal for which the nurse had to:

  • use at least 2 packs of 5 compresses and
  • interrupt her care for > 3 minutes to obtain hemostasis
Day 1 after bleeding

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the pain at D1 when the dressing is removed
Time Frame: Day 1 when the dressing is removed
Visual Analog Pain Scale (scale from 0 to 10).A higher score indicates greater pain intensity
Day 1 when the dressing is removed
Observe the frequency of bleeding over 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of bleeding episodes over 6 months
6 months
Describe the bleeding characteristics and its immediate consequences;
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of type of bleeding (sheet or jet / pulsatile bleeding)
6 months
Describe local care at the time of a bleeding episode;
Time Frame: 6 months
Type of the primary dressing used at the time of bleeding (percent)
6 months
Assess the stress of patients, family, and caregivers after a bleeding episode
Time Frame: 6 months
Stress Visual Analogue Scale (scale from 0 (no stress) to 10 (stress maxi))
6 months
Wound quality of life
Time Frame: 5 months
Wound Quality of Life Scale (5 suggested answers per question: not at all, a little, moderately, quite a bit and a lot)
5 months
Medical management of bleeding
Time Frame: 6 months
Description of medical management related to bleeding: treatment initiated or modified; hemoglobin control; Transfusion; hemostatic radiotherapy; surgical or radiological management (embolization); sedation for the refractory symptom of bleeding in end-of-life patients
6 months
Assess the bleeding episodes according to the dressing subgroups defined in the nonhemostatic group (Interface and absorbent drainage dressing)
Time Frame: Day 1
Description of induced bleeding on Day 1 according to the non-hemostatic dressing subgroup
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marguerite NICODEME, Institut Curie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IC 2023-07

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Wound

Clinical Trials on Algosteril

Subscribe