Lagged Relationships Between Sleep, Balance, and Cognition in Older Adults

November 20, 2025 updated by: University of Florida
This study investigates the use of wearable devices and a sleep diary for tracking sleep and its impact on cognition and balance in older adults over six weeks. It will include routine mobility, balance assessment, and cognitive evaluations, focusing on analyzing the relationships between sleep, mobility, balance, and cognition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study is designed to assess the relationships between sleep quality, balance capabilities, and cognitive functions in older adults. Using a longitudinal approach, participants will be monitored over six weeks with the help of wearable technology (OURA ring) and standardized assessments. Weekly in-person visits will include balance assessments using the Mini-BESTest and mobility tests such as the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Cognitive functions will be evaluated using the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. The study aims to identify key sleep indicators that influence balance and cognition, ultimately contributing to improved strategies for maintaining the health and well-being of older adults.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32603
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy older adults aged 65 and above were recruited from the University of Florida, local retirement communities, and other relevant sources. They were without severe sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, Significant neurological conditions, or balance impairment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy older adults aged 65 and above English-speaking Independent in daily activities Able to walk independently or with minimal assistance (cane or walker) Willing to perform weekly assessments in balance and cognition at the University of Florida, Technology for Occupational Performance Lab

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe cognitive impairment (e.g., diagnosed dementia) Severe sleep disorders (e.g., sleep apnea requiring CPAP) Significant neurological conditions (e.g., Parkinson disease, stroke) Unstable medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, recent surgeries)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Oura ring
All participants will be assigned to a single group receiving a smart ring paired with their phone monitoring sleep and daily activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: 6-week daily assessments
Total Sleep Time will be monitored using the OURA ring, calculated as the sum of all sleep stages in minutes each night. Data will be aggregated to provide a daily and weekly average for each participant.
6-week daily assessments
Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: Daily assessments over 6 weeks
Sleep Onset Latency, defined as the time taken to transition from wakefulness to sleep, will be recorded by the OURA ring each night. Data will be shown in daily and weekly for each participant.
Daily assessments over 6 weeks
Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: Daily assessments over 6 weeks
Sleep Efficiency will be measured as the ratio of total sleep time to time in bed, expressed as a percentage. The OURA ring will track this nightly, and the data will be summarized as daily data points and a weekly average.
Daily assessments over 6 weeks
Cognitive Function
Time Frame: 6 weeks weekly assessments
Evaluated using the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery, with attention to memory, attention, and processing speed.
6 weeks weekly assessments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (Baseline) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) will be administered twice, at baseline and at the end of the study period (Week 6), to assess changes in balance performance. The Berg Balance Scale (or BBS) is a widely used clinical test of a person's static and dynamic balance abilities.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and Post-intervention (Week 6)
Mini-BESTest Score
Time Frame: Weekly assessments over 6 weeks
The Mini-BESTest will be conducted weekly throughout the 6-week study period to evaluate changes in balance performance over time. This test measures dynamic balance, functional mobility, and gait.
Weekly assessments over 6 weeks
Daily Step Count
Time Frame: Daily assessments over 6 weeks recorded by Oura ring
Daily step count will be monitored using the OURA ring. The data will be aggregated daily and weekly for each participant to assess overall physical activity levels.
Daily assessments over 6 weeks recorded by Oura ring
Toe Strength from ToeScale
Time Frame: 6 weeks weekly assessments
Measured using the ToeScale for both flexion and extension strength, comparing baseline and post-intervention data.
6 weeks weekly assessments

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic Variables
Time Frame: Week 1 one time measured
Demographic data, including age, gender, pre-existing conditions, and medical history, will be collected at the baseline (before the intervention begins). This data will be used to analyze participant characteristics and potential correlations with outcome measures.
Week 1 one time measured

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified data might be shared with permission from the funder and PI per request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion and publication of primary outcomes.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Only de-identified data will be shared with permission from the funder and PI per request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Subscribe