- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06599554
Outcome And Complications Assessment In The Surgical Treatment Of Distal Fibular Fractures
Outcome And Complications Assessment In The Surgical Treatment Of Distal Fibular Fractures: an Observational Study
From the archives of the IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute (SIR2020) all cases of patients undergoing surgical interventions for the reduction and synthesis of fractures of the distal fibula will be retrieved Ankle-fract Version 2.0 8/08/2024 7 isolated or associated with other lesions, treated surgically with placement of anatomical fibula plates and any accessory procedures from 01/01/2019 to 1/1/2024. An overall electronic database will be created and all medical records of these cases will be reviewed.
The pre- and post-operative data of the patients will be analyzed by analyzing the medical records and the post-operative x-rays (x-ray performed as per common clinical practice, present at the institute (IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli) which highlight consolidation of the fracture.
The radiological reports will be read, analyzing when the bony consolidation of the fracture is reported in relation to the time elapsed since the operation.
The questionnaires will be submitted to all patients who have completed the course at 1 year.
All patients who sign the informed consent will be asked to complete the questionnaires either at the time of the follow-up visit by common clinical practice or by telephone, in the event that the patients have exceeded the 1-year follow-up.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bologna
-
Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 40136
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
patients suffering from fibula fracture treated surgically through reduction and synthesis with an anatomical fibula plate;
- patients of both sexes aged between 18-90 years;
- patients who have given their written informed consent to participate in the study Patients in possession of a post-operative control x-ray examination to evaluate consolidation and alignment (x-ray performed as per common clinical practice).
Exclusion Criteria:
patients with severe postural instability;
- Patients incapable of understanding or wanting;
- patients with concomitant neurological pathologies that prevent walking and standing
- bedridden patients.
- Lack of written informed consent to participate in the study
- written form to participate in the study
- Physiotherapy not performed
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
patients
patients suffering from fibula fracture treated surgically through reduction and synthesis with an anatomical fibula plate
|
The radiological reports will be read, analyzing when the bony consolidation of the fracture is reported in relation to the time elapsed since the operation. The questionnaires will be submitted to all patients who have completed the course at 1 year. All patients who sign the informed consent will be asked to complete the questionnaires either at the time of the follow-up visit by common clinical practice or by telephone, in the event that the patients have exceeded the 1-year follow-up |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Foot and Ankle Disability Index
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
It is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess functional limitations and disabilities associated with foot and ankle conditions.
The FADI consists of two parts: the main part with 26 questions and the additional sports module with 8 questions.
Each question is rated on a 5-point scale (0 to 4), with 0 indicating the most difficulty and 4 indicating no difficulty.
The scores for each question are added and converted to a percentage, with a higher percentage indicating better function.
It is rated on a total of 104 points, with a score of 0 indicating maximum disability and a score of 104 indicating no disability
|
after 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
clinical and functional evaluation for ankle and foot most validated and used in literature.
There are 4 versions depending on the anatomical region to be evaluated: ankle and hindfoot, midfoot, first toe, last 4 toes.
In this case the ankle and hindfoot version will be used.
The score consists of 9 questions grouped into 3 categories for a total of 100 maximum points: Pain (up to 40 points), Function (up to 50 points) and Alignment (up to 10 points); 100 points represent the best possible clinical-functional condition and the absence of symptoms, 0 points represent the worst possible clinical-functional condition.
It is a tool that combines the subjective component of the patient with the objective evaluation by the doctor.
|
after 1 year
|
|
Visual Analog Score
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
visual representation of the extent of pain that the patient subjectively feels.
The VAS is represented by a 10 cm long line in the original validated version, with or without notches corresponding to each centimeter.
One end indicates the absence of pain and corresponds to 0, the other end indicates the worst pain imaginable and corresponds to 10.
The scale is filled in manually by the patient who is asked to draw a sign on the line that represents the perceived pain .
The distance measured from the 0 end corresponds to the subjective measurement of pain.
|
after 1 year
|
|
12-Item Short Form Survey
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
short version of the SF-36 questionnaire (link).
Through 12 of the 36 questions of the original questionnaire it allows us to investigate the two synthetic indices, PCS Physical Component Summary for the Physical State and MCS Mental Component Summary for the Mental State.
The greatest strengths of this questionnaire are its brevity and relative ease of use.
In Italy the questionnaire was used among other things in 2000 in a multipurpose ISTAT survey on the health status of Italians and a reference database is available with data on a sample of 61,434 subjects representative of the Italian population.
Even for this short form, the literature is full of experiences and studies that demonstrate its validity and reliability.
|
after 1 year
|
|
EQ-5D (EuroQoL) Current Health Assessment
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
valid tool for measuring a patient's quality of life.
|
after 1 year
|
|
x-rays analysis
Time Frame: after 1 year
|
the radiological reports will be read, analyzing when the bony consolidation of the fracture is reported in relation to the time elapsed since the operation.
|
after 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ANKLE-FRACT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...AO Trauma North AmericaCompletedDisplaced Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Shaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreCompletedBimalleolar Ankle FracturePakistan
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingFragility Ankle Fractures and Complex Distal Tibial FracturesEgypt
-
University of ArizonaActive, not recruitingUnstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic DisruptionUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityBauerfeindNot yet recruitingAnkle Fracture | Ankle ArthrodesisCanada
-
Encore Medical, L.P.RecruitingBimalleolar Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Utku GürhanNot yet recruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle FracturesCyprus, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Brian W. NoehrenRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on follow up scores
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedInfertility | Psychological Distress | Infertility, Female | Depression, Anxiety | Nurse's RoleTurkey
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompletedRecurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Refractory Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruiting
-
Sport Injury Prevention Research CentreGeneral Electric; National Basketball AssociationCompletedTendinopathy | Sports Injuries in Children | Injury, Knee | Injury, AnkleCanada
-
Connolly Hospital BlanchardstownCompletedGeneral Surgery | Outpatients | Virtual Clinic | Text MessagingIreland
-
Poitiers University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildRecruiting
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Trialbureau... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAdolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisNetherlands
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensActive, not recruitingQuality of Life | Pain | Lumbar Spine SurgeryFrance
-
Rennes University HospitalUnknown