Fat Injection for Rectocele Treatment: A Novel Approach

September 17, 2024 updated by: Eslam Mohamed Hagagy Mohamed, Cairo University

Fat Injection for Treatment of Rectocele a Novel Technique for Treatment of Tectocele

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous fat grafting as a novel treatment for rectocele, a condition characterized by the herniation of rectal tissue into the posterior vaginal wall. Women aged 18 to 60 years with mild to moderate rectocele, presenting with symptoms such as obstructive defecation or vaginal bulge, will undergo submucosal fat injections. The study will assess the procedure's ability to alleviate symptoms and reduce prolapse recurrence. This prospective, single-arm trial will be conducted at Cairo University Hospitals.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged between 18 and 60 years.
  • Diagnosis of rectocele confirmed by defecography, with a rectocele size of 2 cm (mild) to 4 cm (moderate).
  • Presenting with symptoms of obstructive defecation syndrome, including constipation, incomplete defecation, and/or vaginal bulge.
  • Able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously undergone surgical repair of rectocele.
  • Presence of thrombosed hemorrhoids.
  • History of sclerotherapy injection for rectocele.
  • Diagnosis of anal stenosis.
  • History of coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications.
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fat Injection for Rectocele
Participants in this arm will undergo autologous fat injection as a novel treatment for rectocele. Fat grafts will be harvested from the patient's abdomen, processed to purify the fat, and injected into the submucosal layer of the rectocele through the posterior vaginal wall. This procedure aims to reduce the size of the rectocele, alleviate symptoms like vaginal bulge and obstructive defecation, and prevent recurrence.
In this procedure, autologous fat is harvested from the patient's lower abdomen using a multiport cannula. The fat is then processed via centrifugation to separate the viable fat cells, which are emulsified into nanofat. This nanofat is injected into the submucosal layer of the rectocele through the posterior vaginal wall, using an anoscope for guidance. The procedure is intended to reinforce the rectovaginal fascia, alleviate rectocele symptoms such as obstructive defecation and vaginal bulge, and reduce prolapse recurrence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in Rectocele Size
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure

The outcome will assess the reduction in rectocele size, measured by clinical examination and defecography. Improvement in rectocele grade will be quantified using a standardized rectocele grading scale.

Rectocele Grading Scale:

Grade 0: No prolapse of the rectal wall into the vaginal canal. Grade 1: Mild prolapse, where the rectal wall descends slightly into the vaginal canal, typically during straining, but does not reach the vaginal introitus.

Grade 2: Moderate prolapse, where the rectal wall descends to the level of the vaginal introitus during straining or bowel movements.

Grade 3: Severe prolapse, where the rectal wall protrudes beyond the vaginal introitus, visible externally, especially during straining.

This scale would be used to assess the reduction in rectocele size over time as part of your primary outcome. You can adjust the wording in the outcome measure description to reflect this specific scale.

6 months post-procedure
Symptom Relief
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure

In this we will evaluate the patient's relief from rectocele-associated symptoms, including vaginal bulge and obstructive defecation. This will be assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire. The PFDI-20 measures the severity of pelvic floor symptoms on a scale of 0 to 4 for each item, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

Unit of Measure: PFDI-20 Symptom Score (0-100, where 0 represents no distress and 100 represents maximum distress)

6 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Recurrence of Rectocele
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
This outcome will track the recurrence of rectocele after the autologous fat injection procedure. Recurrence will be defined as the reappearance of rectocele symptoms or the identification of prolapse on clinical examination or defecography.
6 months post-procedure
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: Up to 1 week post-procedure

This outcome will assess postoperative pain and discomfort using a standardized pain scale (e.g., Visual Analog Scale) at regular intervals. It will evaluate both the intensity and duration of pain following the fat injection procedure.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain:

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a tool used to measure pain intensity. It consists of a horizontal line, typically 10 cm in length, with the following markers:

0 cm: No Pain 5 cm: Moderate Pain 10 cm: Worst Pain Imaginable Participants will be asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their level of pain. The distance from the "No Pain" end to the mark is measured in centimeters to give a quantitative assessment of pain intensity.

Interpretation:

0 cm: No Pain 1-3 cm: Mild Pain 4-6 cm: Moderate Pain 7-9 cm: Severe Pain 10 cm: Worst Pain Possible

Up to 1 week post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in publications will be shared. This includes data on clinical outcomes, participant demographics, and relevant procedural details. Supporting documents, such as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will also be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will be available for 2 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the de-identified dataset will be granted to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, subject to review and approval by the study team. Proposals should be directed to the principal investigator, and approved proposals will require a data use agreement. Data will be shared via secure data-sharing platforms or repositories.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Autologous Fat Injection for Rectocele

Subscribe