Evaluating the Impact of Ambient AI on Documentation Efficiency and Clinician Burnout in Primary Care Settings

September 18, 2024 updated by: Samaritan Health Services
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an ambient listening AI product, DAX CoPilot, in improving clinical documentation efficiency and reducing clinician burnout in primary care settings. Researchers will compare results from a group who was given a license to use DAX CoPilot to a group who was not given a license. Participants in the DAX group will use DAX CoPilot system for EHR documentation and participants in the control group will use use standard EHR documentation methods. Participants will also be asked to complete surveys and assessments related to their views on technology and experiences of burnout.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an ambient listening AI product in improving clinical documentation efficiency and patient satisfaction, reducing clinician burnout in primary care settings, and improving operational implementation strategies by harnessing end-user psychology. Employing a randomized, prospective design, the study involved 25 clinicians who were given an ambient listening AI product (DAX CoPilot) after a 1 month baseline period and asked to use it for clinical documentation with a focus on problem-focused visits over a 3-month period, with a control group of 20 clinicians continuing traditional documentation methods. The primary outcomes include changes in documentation efficiency (measured through metrics such as time spent on documentation per patient) and clinician burnout (assessed using the validated Mini-Z 2.0 burnout inventory). Secondary outcomes involve patient satisfaction with clinicians' use of the AI tool and examining end-user technology acceptance among clinicians using a survey based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The study aims to provide insights into the potential of AI-assisted documentation tools in enhancing clinical workflow and addressing the growing concern of clinician burnout.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Corvallis, Oregon, United States, 97330
        • Samaritan Health Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Licensed Clinicians: Independently licensed clinicians (MDs, DOs, NPs, PAs) who have been actively practicing at Samaritan Health Services for at least 6 months.
  2. Primary Care Only: Providers must have a listed specialty of family medicine, internal medicine, or pediatrics, and currently practice primarily in a primary or urgent care clinic.
  3. Provider has an Apple iPhone and is willing to install Epic Haiku.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inpatient-Only Clinicians: Exclude clinicians who only, or primarily, work in inpatient settings, as documentation needs and challenges may differ significantly from those in outpatient settings.
  2. Trainees: Exclude medical students and residents due to their varying levels of experience and dependence on supervisory oversight.
  3. Minimum Outpatient Encounters: Exclude clinicians with fewer than 100 outpatient encounters per month to focus on those with a significant workload in outpatient settings.
  4. Android Smartphones Users: Clinicians may not use Android, or generally any non-Apple or non-iOS smartphones, given the software limitations of the selected intervention technology.
  5. Corrective Action: Exclude clinicians facing dismissal, corrective, or disciplinary action.
  6. Scheduled leave longer than 3 weeks during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DAX CoPilot Group
Participants in this arm were given a DAX CoPilot license and asked to use it for clinical documentation in the EHR.
Participants in this group were given a license for DAX CoPilot and asked to use it for clinical documentation.
No Intervention: Control group
Participants in this arm were not given a DAX CoPilot license and were asked to use standard methods for clinical documentation in the EHR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Documentation efficiency
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the 3 month experimental period
Compare average documentation, workload, and InBasket metrics (tracked by Epic Signal and through a custom data pull for SHS) before and after the implementation of ambient AI among the intervention and control groups; time in notes per appointment, time in notes per scheduled day, progress note length, note composition, time outside scheduled hours, time outside of 7 AM to 7 PM, pajama time, visits closed same day, time in InBasket per appointment, InBasket message turnaround time
From baseline to the end of the 3 month experimental period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Burnout
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of the 3 month experimental period
Clinician burnout as assessed using the Mini-Z 2.0 burnout inventory
From baseline to the end of the 3 month experimental period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months experimental period
Patient satisfaction with the experience of the clinician using DAX CoPilot via a patient survey after a visit in which it was used
3 months experimental period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout

Clinical Trials on DAX CoPilot Group

Subscribe