The Relationship Between Time Perspective, Fear of Cancer Recurrence, Rumination, and Catastrophizing in Gastric Cancer Survivors

September 18, 2024 updated by: Ting Wang

The Formation Pathway of Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Gastric Cancer Survivors From a Time Perspective

The temporal perspective provides a theory oriented to temporal insights that can shed light on the role of cognitive coping styles in the formation of fear of cancer recurrence. The self-regulatory executive function model elucidates the central role of rumination thinking, catastrophizing cognitive coping styles in the formation of cancer recurrence fear. Therefore, this study will rely on both theoretical models to construct a cognitive appraisal coping model to explore the formation pathway of cancer recurrence fear

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

340

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 21116
        • Jiangsu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Select elderly gastric cancer patients who were receiving medical treatment at a tertiary hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative gastroscopy and pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer;
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • There is no history of recurrent disease or new primary cancer
  • Received surgical resection of cancerous tissues or radiotherapy treatment
  • Conscious, with normal communication and comprehension ability
  • The patients were aware of their own condition and diagnosis, and informedly agreed to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

● History of mental or cognitive impairment prior to cancer diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time perspective
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Chinese version of ZIPI scale was adopted for the measurement of time perspective, ZIPI scale is the current international common measurement tool.ZTPI scale was developed by Zimbardo et al. in 1999, which is mainly used for assessing individual's time perspective, the scale has been translated by scholars from many countries, and has good cross-cultural applicability. The Chinese version of the ZTPI scale was Chineseized and revised by Wang Chen in 2016, and the revised scale can be divided into five dimensions of past negativity (7 entries), past positivity (6 entries), present impulsivity (4 entries), future (5 entries), and present predestination (3 entries), with a total of 25 entries after exploratory factor analysis.All questions are scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating a greater tendency towards certain time perspective.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Catastrophizing
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Catastrophizing was measured using the 4-item Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Catastrophizing subscale ( CERQ-CS ). Chinese scholars such as Zhu Xiongzhao (2007) revised the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) to form the Chinese version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-C) applicable to the Chinese version.Each item of the CERQ - CS has 5 responses ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Higher total scores on this subscale indicate higher levels of catastrophizing, and this subscale has good reliability in the Chinese population, the minimum value is 4 points, and the maximum value is 20 points
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Rumination
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Intrusive rumination was measured using the Event-Related Rumination Rumination Questionnaire (ERRI). It is scored according to how many rumination the subjects have produced in the last two weeks and the number of scores is used to assess the degree of rumination of the individual. It was revised by Zhou Xiao et al. (2014) to Cann et al.'s (2010) Event-Related Rumination Questionnaire, which included two dimensions of intrusive rumination and active rumination, with a total of 20 questions. After the revision, the questionnaire had good internal consistency coefficients for the total and dimensions, and the validity indicators also reached a good level. Each item is rated on a 4 point scale, and the scores of the Intrusive rumination scales range from 0 to 30 points The higher the score, the higher the level of invasive rumination.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Fear of cancer recurrence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Chinese version of the Fear of Disease Progression Simplified Scale (FoP-Q-SF) was used to measure the degree of fear of recurrence in cancer patients. Our researchers and scholars, Wu Qiyun et al. translated and Chineseized the FoP-Q-SF according to Chinese characteristics to form a version of the Fear of Progression of Disease Simplified Scale suitable for cancer patients in China. There are 12 questions in total, the higher the score, the higher the level of fear of recurrence. When the score is between 12 and 23, it indicates that the patient is at a low level of fear recurrence. When the score is between 24 and 36, it indicates that the patient is at a moderate level of fear recurrence. When the score is between 36 and 60, it indicates that the patient is at a high level of fear recurrence.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer Patient

Subscribe