Feasibility Study of Placement and Surfactant Administration Through a Preterm Size Laryngeal Mask Airway in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

August 14, 2025 updated by: Tobias Alfvén, Karolinska Institutet

A Single-arm, Prospective Feasibility Study of Placement and Surfactant Administration Through a Preterm Size Laryngeal Mask Airway in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates, With Respiratory Distress Syndrome, at a Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Hanoi, Vietnam

Surfactant administration via a supraglottic airway device or laryngeal mask airway (SALSA) is a minimally invasive method of instilling surfactant in the trachea during spontaneous breathing and after applying nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). However, the procedure has been limited from use in very low birth weight neonates, due to lack of preterm size LMAs, which are now emerging on the market.

The goal of this study is to see if investigators can successfully use a new, smaller laryngeal mask airway (LMA) to place and give surfactant to premature babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) who weigh between 750g and 1500g at birth.

The main objectives of the study are to:

  • Check the placement of the new, smaller LMA: This includes evaluating the airway, how long it takes to place the LMA, how many attempts are needed, and the baby's stability during the process.
  • Evaluate the administration of surfactant using the new LMA: Investigators will look at how the baby responds clinically, any changes in oxygen needs, how many doses of surfactant are required, the level of respiratory support needed, and whether intubation or mechanical ventilation is necessary.
  • Ensure the safety of using the new LMA and administering surfactant: Investigators will monitor the baby's stability during the procedure and watch for any adverse events.
  • Assess pain during the procedure: Investigators will evaluate pain levels using a pain scale based on video reviews.

Above objectives of feasibility are to be assessed before proceeding to a large randomize clinical trial assessing effectiveness and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methodology Feasibility will be measure by a combination of real-life observations of the procedure and video-review with synced physiological data (oxygen saturation and heart rate).

Study Site The Phu San Hanoi Hospital, the largest obstetric hospital in northern Vietnam, receives about 40.000 births annually and has a level-III neonatal intensive care unit with capacity of approximately 40 neonates. Approximately 10-15 neonates weighing less than 1500g per month are admitted who receives standard surfactant treatment with IN-tubation-SURfactant-Extubation (INSURE).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hanoi, Vietnam, 118000
        • Phu San Hanoi Hospital - Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parental informed consent, AND
  • Inborn neonate (=born in the hospital), AND
  • Gestational age less than 34 + 0 weeks, AND
  • Age less than 48 hours, AND
  • Birth weight from 750g to 1500g, AND
  • Clinical diagnosis of RDS requiring non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP/NIPPV) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 0.30-0.60 to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) between 90% and 95%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe respiratory insufficiency in need of emergency intubation
  • Previous surfactant administration
  • Previous mechanical ventilation
  • Known pneumothorax
  • Major malformations
  • Investigators not available

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Surfactant administered via laryngeal mask airway
Enrolled infants will receive surfactant delivered via a neonatal size laryngeal mask airway.
While the child is spontaneously breathing on nasal CPAP treatment, the neonatal intensive care (NICU) physician will place the LMA and assess for adequate airway by CO2-detection, chest movement, pulmonary auscultation of bilateral breath sounds, gastric insufflation, oxygen saturation and heart rate. A placement attempt should not last more than 30 seconds. Surfactant will be administered slowly in 1-2 ml aliquots (Curosurf 200 mg/kg) via an appropriate size laryngeal mask airway. The neonate should primarily be spontaneously breathing and if needed receives gentle supportive positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Gentle supportive PPV is given for 30 seconds after surfactant is administered, before LMA is removed.
Other Names:
  • Laryngeal mask airway surfactant administration
  • Surfactant Therapy via Laryngeal Mask Airway
  • Laryngeal Mask Airway for Surfactant Administration in Neonates
  • Supraglottic airway devices for surfactant treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful LMA placement, with signs of adequate airway, allowing two attempts.
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.

Categorical variable (Yes/No)

A successful placement attempt is defined as insertion of the LMA into the infant's mouth with signs of adequate airway, as per judgement of the physician performing the procedure. Factors that will be considered are carbon dioxide (CO2)-detection, chest movement, pulmonary auscultation of bilateral breath sounds, oxygen saturation and heart rate.

During procedure. 0-30 minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confirmation of carbon dioxide on carbon dioxide detector
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Categorical (Yes/No)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Chest rise during LMA placement
Time Frame: During procedure 0-30 minutes.
Categorical (Yes/No)
During procedure 0-30 minutes.
Bilateral breath sounds by auscultation during LMA placement
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Categorical (Yes/No)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Number of attempts required for successful placement
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Attempt duration more than 30 seconds
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Categorical variable (Yes/No)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of each LMA placement attempt
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Time between attempts
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Fluctuations in heart rate during placement
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (beats per minute). Difference between mean/median at baseline and during placement. Measured by pulse oximetry.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Fluctuations in oxygen saturation (SpO2) during placement
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (percentage). Difference between mean/median at baseline and during placement. Measured by pulse oximetry.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Fluctuations in heart rate during surfactant administration
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (beats per minute). Difference between mean/median at baseline and during surfactant administration. Measured by pulse oximetry.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Fluctuations in oxygen saturation (SpO2) during surfactant administration
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (percentage). Difference between mean/median at baseline and during surfactant administration Measured by pulse oximetry.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of SpO2 less than 80%
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of SpO2 less than 60%
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of SpO2 less than 40%
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of heart rate less than 100 beats per minute (bpm)
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of heart rate less than 60 beats per minute (bpm)
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Number of bradycardia less than 60 bpm for more than 10 seconds
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Number of desaturations to less 80% for more than 30 seconds
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable.
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Number of apneas lasting more than 20 seconds
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Volume of surfactant in gastric residuals after the procedure
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (milliliters)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Total procedure duration
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of positive pressure ventilation during LMA placement
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of positive pressure ventilation during surfactant administration
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Duration of positive pressure ventilation during procedure
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Numerical variable (seconds)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Fraction of inspired oxygen
Time Frame: 10 minutes before procedure until 1 hour after procedure.
Oxygen requirement to maintain SpO2 between 90-95%. Measured before start of procedure and at 5 minutes , 15 minutes , 30 minutes and 1 hour post-procedure.
10 minutes before procedure until 1 hour after procedure.
Need for early redosing of surfactant
Time Frame: Within 6 hours from first surfactant administration
Categorical (Yes/No)
Within 6 hours from first surfactant administration
Need for invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours
Time Frame: Within 72 hours after surfactant administration
Categorical (Yes/No)
Within 72 hours after surfactant administration
Death
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Categorical (Yes/No)
Within 7 days after birth
Duration of oxygen requirement after surfactant administration
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Numerical (hours)
Within 7 days after birth
Duration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after surfactant administration
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Numerical variable (hours)
Within 7 days after birth
Duration of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) after surfactant administration
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Numerical variable (hours)
Within 7 days after birth
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation after surfactant administration
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Numerical variable (hours)
Within 7 days after birth
Number of surfactant doses given
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Numerical variable
Within 7 days after birth
Need for subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Categorical variable (Yes/No)
Within 7 days after birth
Administration method for subsequent surfactant doses
Time Frame: Within 7 days after birth
Categorical. (Surfactant via laryngeal mask airway OR Surfactant via Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation OR Surfactant via intubation followed by mechanical ventilation)
Within 7 days after birth

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of obtaining neonatal pain score during and after procedure.
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Assessed by video review of expert in neonatal pain assessment
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Quality of assessment of variables in pain score
Time Frame: During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Assessed by video review by expert in neonatal pain assessment (eg. facial expressions, crying, breathing, pattern, leg and arm movements, and behavioral state)
During procedure. 0-30 minutes.
Neonatal pain scale: The Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R)
Time Frame: Before, during and after procedure. 0-30 minutes.

Assessed by video review of expert in neonatal pain assessment. Numerical variable.

Indicators assessed in score: Change in heart rate from baseline (0-3p). Change in desaturation from baseline (0-3p). Brow bulge (seconds, 0-3p), Eye squeeze (seconds, 0-3p) nasolabial furrow (seconds, 0-3p), gestational age (0-3), Baseline behavioral state (0-3p. Minimum score is 0p and maximum score is 21p. Higher score indicates more pain.

Before, during and after procedure. 0-30 minutes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Alfvén, Professor, M.D, Ph.D, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study will be available from the principal investigator on reasonable request after publication of results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Clinical Trials on Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airways

Subscribe