Precision Medicine for L/GCMN and Melanoma 1 (Precis-mel 1)

February 26, 2025 updated by: Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica

Precision Medicine for L/GCMN and Melanoma 1 (Precis-mel 1)

The primary objective of this study is to create a highly multidimensional and multicentric database for melanoma that encompasses cohorts of children, adolescent and young adults. This database will be used to perform survival analysis and evaluate sentinel lymph node (SLNB) positivity in CAYA. The secondary objectives to be met are the following:

  • Adaptation and optimization of algorithms: work on optimizing existing precision medicine algorithms, which are currently being used in adult patient care, for their application within pediatric and young adult populations.
  • Implementation of transfer learning: given the limitations associated with pediatric and young adult data, the investigators intend to utilize transfer learning techniques. The study will employ a sequential waterfall methodology, whereby machine learning models trained on adult patient data will be fine-tuned using the more limited data from younger cohorts.
  • Integration of expert medical opinion: to integrate physician's scientific domain knowledge into the decision support system. This will be facilitated through the comprehensive examination of existing literature, as well as the evaluation of variable risk contributions within each patient group.
  • AI-based prognostic models: to develop artificial intelligence-based models for the quantitative prognosis of melanoma across the three age groups: adults, young adults, and children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Precis-Mel 1 is a unicentric observational study using retrospectively collected data. The proposed procedure is to start using data including demographic and family data, genetic data, medical procedures and cancer treatment, cutaneous biopsy, etc. to build a multidimensional dataset and apply AI algorithms that can produce survival curves and sentinel lymph node (SLNB) positivity in CAYA. The approach to be used is presented in the following sub-sections:

  • Data engineering: the multidimensional dataset is meticulously integrated via DBT and SQL queries on a PostgreSQL database. This results in a model-ready comprehensive table, maintaining the crucial temporal dimension of patient histories. Identifiers are assigned to maintain the integrity of the data trail and the connection between various patient events such as metastasis and death. Python-based transformations ensure that sequential patient events are contextually enriched by preceding occurrences. Operations include arithmetic aggregations, extremum calculations and string manipulations. Events are discretized over a standardized temporal frame (1-3 months) for uniform staging reference, also serving to consolidate any misaligned data instances.
  • Model development: our approach employs survival analysis to address the unique challenges of our dataset, particularly censoring, where an event of interest, like death, does not occur within the observation window. Based on our previous experience in modelling this problem, the investigators prefer to use Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis (GBSA), a non-deep learning method, as it effectively addresses data scarcity issues. GBSA adapts the gradient boosting machine algorithm for survival analysis, particularly accommodating censored data. In survival analysis, patients are represented by a triplet (xi, δi, Ti), where xi is the feature vector, Ti is the time to event, and δi indicates whether the observation is censored. Our goal is to estimate the survival function S(t), representing the probability of a patient surviving beyond time t, and the hazard function λ(t), indicating the instantaneous probability of an event occurring at time t. To adapt it for the survival modelling domain, our model utilizes the gradient boosting approach with a modified loss function, the negative log partial likelihood. This allows us to effectively estimate the survival function.
  • Performance metrics: the investigators measure model performance using the concordance index (c-index), a metric particularly suited for survival analysis. The c-index assesses the predictive accuracy of our model by comparing predicted and observed event times. A high c-index indicates that our model effectively predicts the order of patient hazard given its input features.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

6000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Susana Puig Sardà, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +34932275400
  • Email: spuig@clinic.cat

Study Locations

    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Dermatology service)
        • Contact:
          • Susana Puig Sardà, PhD, MD
          • Phone Number: +34932275400
          • Email: spuig@clinic.cat

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Review and/or analysis of pre-existing medical records, biological samples and data collected from patients that have been visited at our hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Melanoma patients of any age with histopathological confirmed melanoma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not having a melanoma diagnosis
  • Not having signed the informed consent
  • Records prior to the year 2012 (as data might not accurately reflect current practices and treatment outcomes)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Melanoma patients
The training dataset will consist of 6000 adult melanoma patients while the adaptation dataset for children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) will be of N = 120.
It is a non-deep learning method that effectively addresses data scarcity issues. GBSA adapts the gradient boosting machine algorithm for survival analysis, particularly accommodating censored data. In survival analysis, patients are represented by a triplet (xi, δi, Ti), where xi is the feature vector, Ti is the time to event, and δi indicates whether the observation is censored. Our goal is to estimate the survival function S(t), representing the probability of a patient surviving beyond time t, and the hazard function λ(t), indicating the instantaneous probability of an event occurring at time t.
The survival model performance will be evaluated using the concordance index (c-index), a metric particularly suited for survival analysis. The c-index assesses the predictive accuracy of our model by comparing predicted and observed event times. A high c-index indicates that our model effectively predicts the order of patient hazard given its input features.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient prognosis curves
Time Frame: 24 months
The main outcome of the study will be to obtain prognosis indicators, mainly survival curves and sentinel lymph node (SLNB) positivity, by training artificial intelligence-based models using tabular clinical data in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA).
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nevi and Melanomas

Clinical Trials on Gradient Boosting Survival Analysis (GBSA),

Subscribe