Impact of the BOOST GAIT Program on Gait Recovery and Functional Mobility After Stroke (BOOST GAIT)

September 21, 2024 updated by: Peter Feys, Hasselt University

Impact of the BOOST GAIT Program on Gait Recovery and Functional Mobility After Stroke - a Pilot Study Impact Van Het BOOST GAIT Programma Op Het Herstel Van Het Gangbeeld En Functionele Mobiliteit Na Een Beroerte - Een Pilootstudie

The overarching goal is to determine if the BOOST GAIT program can improve functional mobility in patients with stroke who are undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and have some walking function, through the application of augmented therapeutic exercises designed to achieve a normative gait pattern. The evaluation will be conducted using a combination of clinical scales and objective motion sensors that map walking quality and performance during activities of daily living, such as rising from a chair and standing.

It is acknowledged that this single-group pilot study, which aims to include 12 participants, is insufficiently powered to address the primary objective. A larger parallel-design study is required to definitively address this issue. To help design a larger study, the current objectives are: first, to have realistic expectations regarding recruitment and dropout rates; second, to identify potential barriers to therapy adherence and data collection that may impede the success of a larger study; third, assess the test-retest reliability of sensor-based motion capture of movement quality during walking and related tasks in hemiparetic stroke patients. For the latter objective, the sensor measurements at the end of the intervention will be repeated on two consecutive days.

In addition to their usual care, participants will undergo additional therapy over a four-week period, with sessions occurring five times per week for one hour as part of the BOOST GAIT program. The BOOST GAIT sessions will be conducted as group-based therapy with four patients and two physiotherapists present to oversee the performance of mobility-specific exercises, including sit-to-stand transfers, standing and stepping, and eventually walking. The rationale for this approach is that the combined effects of augmenting the amount of therapeutic exercises and specifically targeting motor control of the paretic leg will facilitate symmetry during tasks, which in turn will have carry-over effects on safe performance of walking and other mobility tasks.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Herk-de-Stad, Limburg, Belgium, 3540

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A first-ever unilateral stroke, infarction or bleeding
  • Undergoing inpatient rehabilitation in the Jessa hospital, Herk-de-Stad
  • Less than 3 months after stroke onset at the moment of inclusion
  • 18 years of older
  • Berg Balance Scale score 24 or higher (out of 56) at moment of inclusion
  • Timed Up-and-Go score 14 s or higher at moment of inclusion
  • Functional Ambulation Category 3 or higher at moment of inclusion
  • Understanding the goals and procedures of this study and giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive and/or speech impairments that markedly affect the comprehension and execution of instructions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BOOST GAIT
Participants recruited for this pilot study will undergo the BOOST GAIT program in addition to their usual inpatient rehabilitation care.
In addition to usual care, participants will undergo additional therapy over a four-week period, with sessions occurring five times per week for one hour. The BOOST GAIT sessions will be conducted as group-based therapy with four patients and two physiotherapists present to oversee the performance of mobility-specific exercises, including sit-to-stand transfers, standing and stepping, and eventually walking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-selected Gait Speed (m/s)
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
The 10-meter walk test (10m-WT) is used as a performance measure to assess gait speed in meters per second over a short distance. We follow a standardized protocol with 3 immediate test-retest repetitions while the participant is instructed to walk safely at a comfortable pace.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer assessment - motor subscale for the Lower Extremity (FM-LE) [0-34]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
The FM-LE is a stroke-specific impairment measure that assesses the ability to produce voluntary movement control outside of synergistic patterns. A score of 0 indicates a completely flaccid, paralyzed limb, whereas a score of 34 reflects full motor function with synergy-independent movement. A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Motricity Index - subscale for the Lower Extremity (MI-LE) [0-100]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
The MI-LE is an impairment measure that assesses the ability to produce maximum muscle force in the direction of hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Each item is with a score of 0 indicating a paralyzed limb and a score of 33 reflecting normal strength against manual resistance. The maximum score of 99 is set to 100 to give an index score in % of the degree of strength impairment. A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [0-56]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
The BBS is used to rate the ability to safely balance during 14 predetermined tasks. Each task is evaluated on a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) [0-5]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
The FAC is a 6-point scale determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device. A score of 0 means total disability, whereas a maximum score of 5 mean full independent walking over uneven terrains. A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Smoothness during a sit-to-stand transfer
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure quality indicators of smoothness of a sit-to-stand transition. For this purpose, sensors will be attached to the body while recording kinematic data during standing-up from a chair of standardized height without using the arms. The participant is instructed to do this as fast as possible. Shorter and smoother motion mean a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Postural sway during quiet standing
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure the amount of body sway during a quiet stance task. For this purpose, sensors will be attached to the body while kinematic data will be measured during standing with the feet placed at shoulder width. The participant is instructed to remain as still as possible. Reduced levels of sway mean a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Spatio-temporal parameters of the gait pattern during self-selected walking over a short distance
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure spatio-temporal aspects of the gait pattern, with particular interest in estimates of interlimb symmetry, over a short distance. For this purpose, the sensors are attached to the body to record the motion kinematics during a straight, unobstructed walk. The participant is instructed to walk at comfortable pace for 30 seconds. Longer, faster and more consistent steps (ie, less variability), with more symmetry between the legs, mean a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
Spatio-temporal parameters of the gait pattern during fastest walking over a longer distance
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure spatio-temporal aspects of the gait pattern, with particular interest in estimates of interlimb symmetry, over a longer distance. For this purpose, the sensors are attached to the body to record the motion kinematics during a straight, unobstructed walk. The participant is instructed to walk as fast as possible, continuously for 3 minutes. Longer, faster, more consistent and symmetric steps, without decrement over the 3-min period as reflections of fatigue, mean a better outcome.
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Feys, Professor, Hasselt University, REVAL Rehabilitation Research center
  • Principal Investigator: Maaiken Vander Plaetse, MD, FRAME, Jessa Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024/029 - BOOST GAIT pilot
  • B2432024000003 (Other Identifier: Belgian registration number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on BOOST GAIT Program

Subscribe