- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06612359
Impact of the BOOST GAIT Program on Gait Recovery and Functional Mobility After Stroke (BOOST GAIT)
Impact of the BOOST GAIT Program on Gait Recovery and Functional Mobility After Stroke - a Pilot Study Impact Van Het BOOST GAIT Programma Op Het Herstel Van Het Gangbeeld En Functionele Mobiliteit Na Een Beroerte - Een Pilootstudie
The overarching goal is to determine if the BOOST GAIT program can improve functional mobility in patients with stroke who are undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and have some walking function, through the application of augmented therapeutic exercises designed to achieve a normative gait pattern. The evaluation will be conducted using a combination of clinical scales and objective motion sensors that map walking quality and performance during activities of daily living, such as rising from a chair and standing.
It is acknowledged that this single-group pilot study, which aims to include 12 participants, is insufficiently powered to address the primary objective. A larger parallel-design study is required to definitively address this issue. To help design a larger study, the current objectives are: first, to have realistic expectations regarding recruitment and dropout rates; second, to identify potential barriers to therapy adherence and data collection that may impede the success of a larger study; third, assess the test-retest reliability of sensor-based motion capture of movement quality during walking and related tasks in hemiparetic stroke patients. For the latter objective, the sensor measurements at the end of the intervention will be repeated on two consecutive days.
In addition to their usual care, participants will undergo additional therapy over a four-week period, with sessions occurring five times per week for one hour as part of the BOOST GAIT program. The BOOST GAIT sessions will be conducted as group-based therapy with four patients and two physiotherapists present to oversee the performance of mobility-specific exercises, including sit-to-stand transfers, standing and stepping, and eventually walking. The rationale for this approach is that the combined effects of augmenting the amount of therapeutic exercises and specifically targeting motor control of the paretic leg will facilitate symmetry during tasks, which in turn will have carry-over effects on safe performance of walking and other mobility tasks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jonas Schröder, Hasselt University, PhD
- Phone Number: +32 473730164
- Email: jonas.schroder@uhasselt.be
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sarah Meyer, Jessa Hospital, PhD
- Phone Number: +32 472789592
- Email: Sarah.Meyer@jessazh.be
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Herk-de-Stad, Limburg, Belgium, 3540
- Recruiting
- FRAME by Jessa Ziekenhuis
-
Contact:
- Sarah Meyer, PhD
- Phone Number: +32 472789592
- Email: Sarah.Meyer@jessazh.be
-
Contact:
- Elvi Lemmens
- Email: elvi.lemmens@jessazh.be
-
Contact:
- Maaiken Vander Plaetse, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A first-ever unilateral stroke, infarction or bleeding
- Undergoing inpatient rehabilitation in the Jessa hospital, Herk-de-Stad
- Less than 3 months after stroke onset at the moment of inclusion
- 18 years of older
- Berg Balance Scale score 24 or higher (out of 56) at moment of inclusion
- Timed Up-and-Go score 14 s or higher at moment of inclusion
- Functional Ambulation Category 3 or higher at moment of inclusion
- Understanding the goals and procedures of this study and giving informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant cognitive and/or speech impairments that markedly affect the comprehension and execution of instructions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BOOST GAIT
Participants recruited for this pilot study will undergo the BOOST GAIT program in addition to their usual inpatient rehabilitation care.
|
In addition to usual care, participants will undergo additional therapy over a four-week period, with sessions occurring five times per week for one hour.
The BOOST GAIT sessions will be conducted as group-based therapy with four patients and two physiotherapists present to oversee the performance of mobility-specific exercises, including sit-to-stand transfers, standing and stepping, and eventually walking.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-selected Gait Speed (m/s)
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
The 10-meter walk test (10m-WT) is used as a performance measure to assess gait speed in meters per second over a short distance.
We follow a standardized protocol with 3 immediate test-retest repetitions while the participant is instructed to walk safely at a comfortable pace.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer assessment - motor subscale for the Lower Extremity (FM-LE) [0-34]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
The FM-LE is a stroke-specific impairment measure that assesses the ability to produce voluntary movement control outside of synergistic patterns.
A score of 0 indicates a completely flaccid, paralyzed limb, whereas a score of 34 reflects full motor function with synergy-independent movement.
A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Motricity Index - subscale for the Lower Extremity (MI-LE) [0-100]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
The MI-LE is an impairment measure that assesses the ability to produce maximum muscle force in the direction of hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion.
Each item is with a score of 0 indicating a paralyzed limb and a score of 33 reflecting normal strength against manual resistance.
The maximum score of 99 is set to 100 to give an index score in % of the degree of strength impairment.
A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [0-56]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
The BBS is used to rate the ability to safely balance during 14 predetermined tasks.
Each task is evaluated on a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function.
A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) [0-5]
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
The FAC is a 6-point scale determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device.
A score of 0 means total disability, whereas a maximum score of 5 mean full independent walking over uneven terrains.
A higher score therefore reflects a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Smoothness during a sit-to-stand transfer
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure quality indicators of smoothness of a sit-to-stand transition.
For this purpose, sensors will be attached to the body while recording kinematic data during standing-up from a chair of standardized height without using the arms.
The participant is instructed to do this as fast as possible.
Shorter and smoother motion mean a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Postural sway during quiet standing
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure the amount of body sway during a quiet stance task.
For this purpose, sensors will be attached to the body while kinematic data will be measured during standing with the feet placed at shoulder width.
The participant is instructed to remain as still as possible.
Reduced levels of sway mean a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Spatio-temporal parameters of the gait pattern during self-selected walking over a short distance
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure spatio-temporal aspects of the gait pattern, with particular interest in estimates of interlimb symmetry, over a short distance.
For this purpose, the sensors are attached to the body to record the motion kinematics during a straight, unobstructed walk.
The participant is instructed to walk at comfortable pace for 30 seconds.
Longer, faster and more consistent steps (ie, less variability), with more symmetry between the legs, mean a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
|
Spatio-temporal parameters of the gait pattern during fastest walking over a longer distance
Time Frame: At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
A wearable sensor system (APDM, Opal sensors) will be used to measure spatio-temporal aspects of the gait pattern, with particular interest in estimates of interlimb symmetry, over a longer distance.
For this purpose, the sensors are attached to the body to record the motion kinematics during a straight, unobstructed walk.
The participant is instructed to walk as fast as possible, continuously for 3 minutes.
Longer, faster, more consistent and symmetric steps, without decrement over the 3-min period as reflections of fatigue, mean a better outcome.
|
At inclusion and the end of the intervention at 4 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Feys, Professor, Hasselt University, REVAL Rehabilitation Research center
- Principal Investigator: Maaiken Vander Plaetse, MD, FRAME, Jessa Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/029 - BOOST GAIT pilot
- B2432024000003 (Other Identifier: Belgian registration number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
Clinical Trials on BOOST GAIT Program
-
Jessa HospitalCompleted
-
University of South FloridaUnknownEhlers-Danlos Syndrome | Joint Hypermobility | Hyperextension Knees
-
University of ValenciaAsociación Parkinson ValenciaNot yet recruiting
-
University of GrazRecruitingBody Composition | Muscle Strength | Physical FitnessAustria
-
Laval UniversityCompletedPatellofemoral Pain (PFPS)Canada
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital; The Hong Kong Buddhist HospitalActive, not recruitingTotal Knee ReplacementHong Kong
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy Spastic DiplegiaEgypt
-
University of ManitobaWeston Brain InstituteNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted