Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing or Biventricular Pacing in AF and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

September 26, 2024 updated by: srdpiers

Pacing Away from Heart Failure: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing or Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

It is unknown whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) or biventricular pacing best prevents or reverses left ventricular (LV) adverse remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require ventricular pacing or CRT. This randomized non-inferiority cross-over trial will compare left ventricular end-systolic volume change and secondary endpoints between LBBAP and biventricular pacing in patients with AF and LV dysfunction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may require ventricular pacing because of bradycardia, AV junction ablation, or for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with the risk of adverse LV remodelling and heart failure, in particular in those with pre-existing LV dysfunction. Both LBBAP and biventricular pacing can prevent LV dyssynchrony. It is unknown which pacing mode best prevents or reverses LV adverse remodelling in patients with AF who require ventricular pacing or CRT.

Primary objectives:

  1. To compare LVESV change between LBBAP and biventricular pacing in patients with AF and LV dysfunction.

    Secondary objectives:

  2. To compare change in quality of life, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walking distance, QRS duration, vectorcardiographic QRS area, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain and NT-proBNP between LBBAP and biventricular pacing in patients with AF and LV dysfunction.

Study design: Randomized patient and assessor blinded non-inferiority cross-over trial.

Study population: Patients with permanent AF and LVEF < 50% who require ventricular pacing because of bradycardia, AV junction ablation, or CRT.

Intervention: Patients will be randomized according to a crossover design to first 6 months of LBBAP and then 6 months of biventricular pacing, or vice versa.

After finishing the randomization phase of the study at 12 months, patients will be followed according to routine clinical practice. Clinical follow-up, an ECG, device interrogation and echocardiography will be performed at 36 months (2 years after finishing the randomization phase) in all patients.

Main study parameters/endpoints: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), 6-minute walking distance, ECG (vectorcardiographic QRS area, QRS duration), echocardiography (LVESV, LVEF, global longitudinal strain), NT-proBNP, lead and device performance (sensing, pacing, expected battery life), complications and costs will be evaluated for each pacing mode.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: For the purpose of this randomized controlled trial, patients will also receive a LBBAP lead. The additional risk of serious adverse events is ~1.5% (lead dislodgement 1.1%, 0.4% acute coronary syndrome [all managed conservatively without further sequelae in prior studies]).(1) Patients who participate in the trial will have 3 extra follow-up visits, 4 extra questionnaires, 3 extra ECGs, 3 extra device interrogations, 3 extra echocardiograms and 4 extra blood samples (5 mL each).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, DK-8200
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Mads B Kronborg, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Jens C Nielsen, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Jens Kristensen, MD, PhD
    • Zuid-Holland
      • Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2300 RC
        • Recruiting
        • Leiden University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Sebastiaan RD Piers, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Katja Zeppenfeld, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Adults ≥18 years with permanent AF and LVEF < 50% who either require ventricular pacing because of bradycardia including patients undergoing AV junction ablation, or have an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  • Expected percentage of ventricular pacing > 40%
  • ≥ 3 months of heart failure medication optimization

Of note, patients who already have a device, but require an upgrade to a CRT device, can also be included

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy or active pregnancy wish
  • Not eligible for implantation of an RV lead, LBBAP lead, or LV lead in the coronary sinus
  • Recent valve intervention/surgery or acute myocardial infarction (< 6 months)
  • NYHA functional class IV heart failure, left ventricular assist device or cardiac transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Left bundle branch area pacing
6 months of left bundle branch area pacing.
Pacing of the left bundle branch area using a transvenous pacemaker lead
Other Names:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Conduction system pacing
Active Comparator: Biventricular pacing
6 months of biventricular pacing using a RV apex lead and LV lead in the coronary sinus.
Pacing of the right and left ventricle using transvenous pacemaker leads
Other Names:
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) change
Time Frame: 6 months
Left ventricular end-systolic volume change measured by echocardiography
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in New York Heart Association functional class
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA)
6 months
Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months
The Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for patients with heart failure, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of heart failure on quality of life, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst quality of life).
6 months
Change in 6-minute walking distance
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in 6-minute walking distance
6 months
Change in QRS duration
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in QRS duration on the 12-lead ECG
6 months
Change in vectorcardiographic QRS area
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in vectorcardiographic QRS area on the vectorcardiogram reconstructed from a regular 12-lead ECG
6 months
Change in left ventricular function
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in left ventricular function ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain on echocardiography
6 months
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in NT-proBNP as a heart failure biomarker
6 months
Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
Complications related to device and leads
6 months
Lead pacing thresholds
Time Frame: 6 months
Lead pacing thresholds, expressed as volts at pulse width (e.g. 0.4 V @ 0.4 ms). A lower pacing threshold is better.
6 months
Costs
Time Frame: 6 months
Costs related to the device and leads
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sebastiaan Piers, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be shared with other researchers whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of the study and publication, the data will be shared with other researchers whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Left bundle branch area pacing

Subscribe