Composite Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars With or Without Pulpotomy. Prospective 24 Month Clinical Trial.

November 17, 2025 updated by: Nikos Lygidakis, Lygidakis Dental Clinic

After 24 months:

  • Investigation of the success rate of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy.
  • Comparison of Class II composite resin restorations in primary molars that have undergone pulpotomy with restorations of the same type in the same patient, in which no pulpotomy has been performed.

The null hypothesis of the study is that there is no statistically significant difference in the success of Class II resin restorations after their placement in primary molars, regardless of whether a pulpotomy has been performed or not.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Athens, Greece, 11528
        • Lygidakis Dental Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children aged 3-9 years

    • At least one pulpotomy in a carious primary molar requiring a Class II resin restoration
    • At least one Class II cavity in a carious primary molar in the same patient that requires a resin restoration
    • The teeth to be restored must not present clinical signs of pulp necrosis, such as pathological mobility or abscess/fistula
    • Parents have signed an informed consent form
    • The young patients return for evaluation at 12 and 24 months
    • There is no exfoliation or extraction of the evaluated teeth before the 24-month period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Class II composite restoration on primary teeth with pulpotomy
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. After pulpotomy completion with a layer of MTA®, an intermediate layer of glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond Plus™) is placed before the final composite resin restoration. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).
Active Comparator: Class II composite restoration on primary teeth without pulpotomy
The same dentist performs all restorations. All treatments are carried out using a rubber dam and the appropriate local anesthesia. Class II resin restorations are performed after complete caries removal, placement of a partial matrix, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, bonding with a 4th-generation adhesive agent (Prime n Bond NT, Dentsply™), and placement of composite resin (Filtek Universal™, 3M™).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified USPHS criteria
Time Frame: Assessment is done at 12 and 24 months following placement of the composite restoration
Modified USPHS criteria are variations of the original United States Public Health Service criteria used in dentistry to clinically evaluate restorations. They include the following criteria: marginal adaptation, retention, marginal discoloration, and secondary caries, with specific parameters and scoring scales adjusted for a particular study or material being evaluated. These modifications allow for a more precise assessment of dental restorations by tailoring the evaluation to specific clinical situations or restorative materials
Assessment is done at 12 and 24 months following placement of the composite restoration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1495 (Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Department of Scientific Research Project)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Composite Restoration

Clinical Trials on Class II restoration after pulpotomy

Subscribe