- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06644482
Exercise as Treatment for Patients With Inclusion Body Myositis
June 21, 2025 updated by: Kristine Risum, Oslo University Hospital
There is little knowledge about exercise for patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM).
Patients with IBM have limited access to rehabilitation and physiotherapy resources, despite a significant need for these services due to the progressive nature of the condition, which leads to a gradual decline in physical function.
The purpose of the project is to develop and implement a 16-week exercise intervention at Oslo University Hospital (OUS) for patients with IBM living in Oslo and the surrounding area.
The exercise sessions will take place once a week at OUS, under the guidance of physiotherapists with extensive clinical experience with this patient group.
Patients are encouraged to exercise at home at least once a week between sessions at OUS to achieve sufficient amount of exercise that normally will improve physical fitness.
The feasibility and benefits of the exercise intervention will be evaluated using various methods, such as focus group interviews, physical tests, and questionnaires.
The study will also provide valuable insight into whether exercise can lead to improvements in muscle strength, fitness, and balance in patients with IBM.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0424
- Oslo University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- IBM diagnosis
- Able to walk with aids
Exclusion Criteria
-Unable to understand and write Norwegian
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Exercise group in a hospital
Participants will take part in an exercise group delivered once a week in a hospital setting for 16 weeks
|
Participants will exercise in a group once a week for 16 weeks in a hospital setting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: proportion completing the exercise intervention
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Proportion of included participants completing the exercise intervention
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Feasibility: proportion of received exercise diaries
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks
|
Proportion of received exercise diaries (0-16 per participant)
|
Baseline to 16 weeks
|
|
Recruitment: proportion enrolled
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Proportion of eligible patients enrolled
|
Baseline
|
|
Feasibility: exercise diaries
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
The participants will log experiences with the intervention (e.g.
completed/not completed exercises, reasons for any non-completion, other training activities, barriers/facilitators).
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Feasibility: proportion of patients completing physical fitness tests
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Proportion of patients completing physical fitness tests
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Feasibilty: Focus group interview
Time Frame: 17 weeks
|
Participants will participate in focus group interviews exploring the experiences of the intervention
|
17 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in walking distance
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by the 2 minutes walking test.
Changes in walking distance measured as meters.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Changes in functional lower extremity strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
The patients are to stand up and sit down from a chair as many times as they can within 30 seconds, and the total number of times is recorded.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Changes in muscle endurance
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by the Functional Index- 2 in three muscle groups; shoulder flexors (maximum 60 repetitions), neck flexors (maximum 30 repetitions) and hip flexors (maximum 60 repetitions).
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Changes in muscle strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by the Manual Muscle test - 8 (MMT - 8), which includes unilateral testing of muscle strength in 8 eight muscle groups; (Deltoid, Biceps, Wrist extensors, Quadriceps, Ankle dorsiflexors, Neck flexors, Gluteus medius and Gluteus maximux).
Each muscle group is scored on a 0-10-point scale (10=best score).
The total MMT - 8 will be calculated (0-80, 80=best score).
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Changes in grip stength
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by hydraulic hand dynamometer (Baseline).
Change in grip strength is recorded in kilograms.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in the Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a 14-item objective measure that assesses static and dynamic balance and fall risk in adults.
Each item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating an inability to complete the task entirely and 4 indicating an ability to complete the task criterion.The total score ranges from 0-52 (52 indicates best score).
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
The IBMFRS consists of 10 questions about a patient's ability to perform daily activities (including walking, dressing, swallowing and handling utensils).
Each question is answered using a number from 0-4.
The numbers are added up to give the total score ranging from 0 to 40, with 40 being the best possible score
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Change in the last week disability on the total HAQ score (0-3, 0 indicates best possible function).
The HAQ comprises 30 questions, covering eight functional ability domains related to daily living during the past week (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities).
The score ranges from 0-3 (0 indicates no disability, 3 indicates severe disability) in each domain, of which the total CHAQ is calculated.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
The patients will identify 3-5 important activities they are unable to perform or have difficulty with due to inclusion body myositis.
The patients are then asked to rate the current level of difficulty associated with each activity on an 11-point scale, from 0 (not able to perform the activity) to 10 (no problems).
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in self-reported physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short form (IPAQ-SF).
Change in time (minutes per week/day) and Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET-minutes per week/day) spent on sitting, walking, and moderate- and vigorous intensity physical activity the last week.
METs are calculated by using the corresponding MET-values for walking (3.3 MET), and moderate-(4.0
MET) and vigorous (8.0 MET) intensity physical activity.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
|
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF36) which comprises 36 questions covering the areas of physical function, role limitations (physical), pain, general health perception, energy and fatigue (vitality), social function, role limitations (emotional), and mental health.
The results are recoded so that the final score for each area ranges from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates the best possible health.
|
Baseline and 17 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety].
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Patients will log 1) total of falls during the training period and 2) total number of near-falls during the training period.
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Tolerability]- pain.
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Self-reported pain will be assessed by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Tolerability]- muscle fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Self-reported muscle fatigue will be assessed by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no muscle fatigue) to 10 (worst muscle fatigue)
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Tolerability]- muscle fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Self-reported muscle soreness will be assessed by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no muscle soreness) to 10 (worst muscle soreness)
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Tolerability]- fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 week
|
Self-reported fatigue will be assessed by numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worst fatigue)
|
Baseline to 16 week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 6, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 28, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
May 28, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 9, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 14, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
October 16, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 24, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 21, 2025
Last Verified
February 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 728436
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Data can be made available on reasonable request
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Feasibility Study
-
Northeastern UniversityRecruiting
-
University of MichiganEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedFeasibility Pilot StudyUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedMedical Device | Feasibility StudyUnited States
-
Doctors with Africa - CUAMMCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon; St. Luke Catholic Hospital, Wolisso... and other collaboratorsCompletedPregnancy | Medical Device | Feasibility Study | Instrumental Delivery | Acceptability StudyEthiopia
-
Washington University School of MedicineMallinckrodtCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Mobile Applications | Feasibility StudyUnited States
-
Zealand University HospitalCompletedFeasibility StudyDenmark
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCompletedFeasibility Study | Social-emotional Learning CurriculumCanada
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingFeasibility Pilot Study | Post Prandial Blood Glucose
-
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingAdverse Effect | Safety and Effectiveness | Feasibility StudyChina
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenMedical University Innsbruck; University Hospital Bergmannsheil BochumRecruitingFeasibility Studies | Pilot Study | Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs)Austria, Germany, Switzerland
Clinical Trials on Exercise group in a hospital setting
-
Umeå UniversityActive, not recruitingPhysical InactivitySweden
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisMaquet CardiovascularCompletedCardiac Arrest | Sudden DeathFrance
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompleted
-
University Hospital, ToulouseNot yet recruitingStroke | Réhabilitation
-
Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterUnknown
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedSimulation-based Midwifery EducationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lund UniversityWithdrawn
-
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation...AintreeNHSTrustCompleted
-
Microclinic InternationalRoyal Health Awareness Society (RHAS); Jordanian Ministry of Health (MoH)CompletedHyperglycemia | Hypertension | Obesity | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Body Weight | Weight Loss | Blood Pressure | Weight Gain | Social Behavior | Weight, Body | Glucose, High Blood | Lifestyle, Healthy | Weight Change, Body | Behavior, Health | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Blood Pressure, High | Hyperglycaemia... and other conditionsJordan