A Patient-Directed Computerized Intervention to Address Reproductive Coercion

December 7, 2025 updated by: Yasamin Yoko Kusunoki, University of Michigan

A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Patient-Directed Computerized Intervention to Address Reproductive Coercion

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of "BRIDGES" (Building Reproductive Decision-Making, Empowerment, & Support), a new patient-directed educational website (bridges4support.org). BRIDGES aims to improve family planning (FP) patients' understanding of reproductive coercion (RC) and harm-reduction strategies, as well as their ability to discuss RC-related issues with healthcare providers if they so choose. Designed to be integrated into routine FP clinical care and pre-visit materials, this brief (5-10 minute) educational website includes 1) education on reproductive coercion and (un)healthy relationships, 2) harm-reduction and safety planning strategies, and 3) patient activation messages to encourage patients to actively engage with their healthcare provider. Four study clinics were selected from Planned Parenthood of Michigan (PPMI) clinics based on patient volume and number of clinics. Two of the four chosen clinics will be randomly assigned to receive BRIDGES, with 40 participants per clinic, and the other two clinics will be randomly assigned to receive the standard of care, also with 40 participants per clinic. Control clinics will receive the standard of care, which includes the typical support and counseling provided at these centers for FP patients, and the intervention clinics will receive BRIDGES plus standard of care. Research staff will recruit FP patients ages 18-29 (N=160) through patient portal messages. Participants will complete online, self-directed Qualtrics surveys at three time points: pre-appointment, post-appointment, and 3-months. Survey data will be used to assess differences in patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior between patients attending intervention clinics and patients attending control FP clinics (i.e., receiving standard-of-care FP services). Feasibility, implementation, and pilot outcome data will be used to further refine the intervention towards the goal of conducting a future larger-scale study of BRIDGES within FP clinics.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family planning patients at study clinics, including women, transgender men, non-binary, and other gender-diverse people
  • Ages 18-29
  • Able to participate in English
  • Has an upcoming birth control appointment (telemedicine or in-clinic) scheduled at a study clinic during the enrollment period (November 2024-June 2025). Appointments must be scheduled for at least 24 hours after study enrollment.
  • Has access to PPMI MyChart (i.e., study clinic patient portal)
  • Participants who complete the Pre-Appointment Survey and attend the scheduled birth control appointment or a rescheduled (up to 3x) appointment are eligible for the Post-Appointment Survey
  • Participants who complete the Pre-Appointment Survey are eligible for the 3-Month Survey, regardless of whether they complete the Post-Appointment Survey

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously exposed to the intervention (e.g., participated in user testing during September and October 2024)
  • Does not have a valid email address

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
Experimental: BRIDGES plus standard of care
BRIDGES is a patient-directed computerized universal education on RC that is delivered within the FP setting, and that does not require the patient to disclose RC experiences to learn about RC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website was acceptable
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statements: The BRIDGES website is an acceptable way to learn about each of the following (reproductive coercion, birth control methods that other people are less able to control, things to discuss with a healthcare provider, resources, and use of the patient portal for the invitation to the study). Reponse options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the user liked BRIDGES
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: I like the bridges website. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that BRIDGES was helpful
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: Overall, the BRIDGES website helped me. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the user was comfortable using BRIDGES
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: I felt uncomfortable when viewing the BRIDGES website. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the user felt safe using BRIDGES
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: I felt unsafe when viewing the BRIDGES website. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that BRIDGES was easy to use
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website was easy to use. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website helped them talk to their healthcare provider about their intimate relationships
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website helped me talk to my healthcare provider about my intimate relationships. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website helped them talk to their healthcare provider about their preferred birth control method
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website helped me talk to my healthcare provider about my preferred birth control method. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website helped them choose a birth control method that works best for them
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website helped me choose a birth control method that works best for me. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website influenced their decision about which birth control method they wanted
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website influenced my decision about which birth control method I wanted. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the BRIDGES website will help them talk to their friends and family about reproductive coercion
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: The BRIDGES website will help me talk to my friends and family about reproductive coercion. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the user would share the BRIDGES website with a friend or family member who needed support
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: I would share the BRIDGES website with a friend or family member who needed support. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment
Level of agreement that the user would use the BRIDGES website if the user were not in the study
Time Frame: Up to five days after appointment
In a self-administered survey, patients at the treatment clinic are asked the extent to which they agree with the following statement: If I was not in this research study, I would use the BRIDGES website. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement.
Up to five days after appointment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge about which birth control methods can be kept private
Time Frame: Pre-appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: Imagine you wanted to keep your birth control private. Which of the following birth control methods are more difficult for other people (like a partner) to mess with or control? (select all that apply). Seven types of birth control methods are provided. The correct answers include birth control implant, injectable birth control, intrauterine device, and sterilization. Incorrect answers include birth control pills, condoms, and withdrawal.
Pre-appointment
Change in knowledge about which birth control methods can be kept private
Time Frame: Three months after appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: Imagine you wanted to keep your birth control private. Which of the following birth control methods are more difficult for other people (like a partner) to mess with or control? (select all that apply). Seven types of birth control methods are provided. The correct answers include birth control implant, injectable birth control, intrauterine device, and sterilization. Incorrect answers include birth control pills, condoms, and withdrawal. A measure of change will be created by subtracting the number of correct methods 3 months after interacting with BRIDGES minus the number of correct methods before interacting with BRIDGES. A value of 0 will signify that knowledge remained the same; a positive value will signify that knowledge increased; a negative value will signify that knowledge decreased.
Three months after appointment
Knowledge about what reproductive coercion is
Time Frame: Pre-appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: TRUE or FALSE: Pressuring a partner to become pregnant when they don't want to be can be a sign of an unhealthy relationship. The correct answer is true.
Pre-appointment
Change in knowledge about what reproductive coercion is
Time Frame: Three months after appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: TRUE or FALSE: Pressuring a partner to become pregnant when they don't want to be can be a sign of an unhealthy relationship. The correct answer is true. A measure of change will be created that compares the answer to this question before and three months after interacting with BRIDGES. If the response is true at both time points or was false before and true after, it would signify an improvement in knowledge.
Three months after appointment
Knowledge about the role of healthcare providers
Time Frame: Pre-appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: TRUE or FALSE: Healthcare providers can support people who feel controlled in their reproductive decisions. The correct answer is true.
Pre-appointment
Change in knowledge about the role of healthcare providers
Time Frame: Three months after appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked: TRUE or FALSE: Healthcare providers can support people who feel controlled in their reproductive decisions. The correct answer is true. A measure of change will be created that compares the answer to this question before and three months after their appointment. If the response is false before and true after, it would signify an improvement in knowledge.
Three months after appointment
Confidence in their ability to ask with their healthcare providers about issues related to reproductive coercion
Time Frame: Three months after appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked the extent to which they agree with being confident in asking their healthcare provider about issues related to reproductive coercion. Response options for each statement ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) such that a higher score would signify agreement with the statement. The responses to this question will be compared between the treatment and control.
Three months after appointment
Change in level of reproductive autonomy
Time Frame: Three months after appointment
In a self-administered survey, all patients are asked about their level of reproductive autonomy based on a validated 14-item measure which included three subscales that encompass reproductive autonomy including communication, freedom from coercion, and decision-making. Mean scores were calculated for each subscale by adding the value of the response choice for each item on the subscale and dividing this value by the number of items on the subscale. Higher scores on each subscale represented higher levels of RA (score ranges from 0 to 14). A measure of change will be created that compares the answer to this question before and three months after their appointment.
Three months after appointment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00259457
  • R21HD107619 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feasibility Pilot Study

Clinical Trials on Educational web-based application

Subscribe