Mindful Self-Compassion to Address PTSD and Substance Use in Unhoused Women (MSC for PTSD)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Dana Rose Garfin, University of California, Los Angeles

Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorder (SUD) present major threats to public health. PTSD and SUD are major correlates of disability, often resulting in severe social and occupational impairment. Comorbidity between PTSD and SUD (PTSD/SUD) is common and frequently co-occurs with other mental health ailments including depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Comorbidity may be amplified in groups vulnerable to high trauma exposure, such as women with low socioeconomic status including women experiencing homelessness (WEH). Moreover, the reciprocal nature of PTSD/SUD (substances are used to cope with PTSD symptoms; substance use can create high-risk situations for new traumas to occur), can create a cycle of trauma and symptomatology leading to a critical health disparity.

PTSD/SUD can be costly and difficult to treat, with treatment completion often low and relapse rates often high. Low-cost, complementary interventions, such as self-compassion (SC) interventions, which target key mechanisms that maintain PTSD/SUD, could improve treatment outcomes. SC interventions include practices that build skills to improve emotional responses, cognitive understanding, and mindfulness. Recent research supports the benefit of SC interventions for reducing PTSD, SUD, and related comorbidities, potentially with large effects. However, sample sizes have generally been small and randomized designs infrequently used. Moreover, while SC interventions may act to improve key mechanisms of treatment response and/or symptom maintenance (e.g., emotion regulation/dysregulation, trauma-related guilt, trauma-related shame, moral injury, and craving), such mediating factors have been underexplored. To address these limitations, the present proposal will implement community-based research principles and use a two phase, mixed-method design to adapt and test a widely used SC intervention (Mindful Self Compassion; MSC) for use with a sample of WEH with PTSD/SUD. The project will be conducted in partnership with a state-funded drug treatment facility that serves women and families experiencing high health disparities.

Phase I was completed in 2023 and adapted the standard MSC course for use with trauma-exposed WEH with PTSD/SUD using the ADAPT-ITT model, an eight-stage model that engages community partners to increase feasibility and acceptability of interventions for at-risk populations.

Phase II will be an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial (N=202) to test the benefit of the adapted MSC at improving primary (PTSD, substance use) and secondary outcomes (depression, anxiety, hopelessness) among a sample of WEH with PTSD/SUD residing in a residential drug treatment site. MSC (n=101) will be compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU; n=101). WEH in the MSC group will complete a 6-week (six sessions plus a half-day retreat) MSC intervention.

The TAU group will engage in weekly check-ins with the research team but will not receive an intervention. WEH will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at a 4-month follow-up. One-on-one interviews will be conducted with the MSC group to collect qualitative data on experiences. An exploratory aim will be to elucidate mechanism of treatment-response and maintenance or remission of PTSD symptoms. These potential mechanisms will include SC, emotion regulation/dysregulation, trauma-related guilt, trauma-related shame, moral injury, and craving.

Results may inform treatment for PTSD/SUD in WEH and other groups experiencing high health disparities and provide valuable insights into mechanisms underlying PTSD/SUD symptoms over time. Findings are relevant to military populations, which experience high rates of PTSD/SUD, and other populations disproportionately exposed to trauma.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pomona, California, United States, 91767
        • Prototypes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Identifies as woman
  • Age 18 and over
  • Probable PTSD as judged by the PCL-5 (score of 31 or higher, indicated as having optimal signal detection)
  • No cognitive impairment according to a score of < 10 on the Short-Blessed Test
  • Experienced homelessness in the past 6 months or prior to incarceration ("spent night in public or private shelter or on the street")
  • Able to speak and understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to speak English
  • Judged to be cognitively impaired, as indicated by score > 10 on the Short-Blessed Screener
  • Does not meet other inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindful Self Compassion Classes
(MSC) is a mind-body integrative health intervention that utilizes meditations, other contemplative practices, home practices, and experiential exercises (including group discussions) to increase SC. MSC can be done in groups of 10-25. To increase feasibility of MSC for use in residential drug treatment facilities we will aim to adapt MSC to 7 sessions (6 weekly sessions in alignment with the MSC short course plus the half day retreat included in the full course to facilitate skill consolidation). Sessions will be conducted in a group-based format: prior research found group-based formats equivalent to individual-level interventions for PTSD/SUD.
(MSC) is a mind-body integrative health intervention that utilizes meditations, other contemplative practices, home practices, and experiential exercises (including group discussions) to increase SC. MSC can be done in groups of 10-25. To increase feasibility of MSC for use in residential drug treatment facilities, we will aim to adapt MSC to 7 sessions (6 weekly sessions in alignment with the MSC short course plus the half day retreat included in the full course to facilitate skill consolidation). Sessions will be conducted in a group-based format: prior research found group-based formats equivalent to individual-level interventions for PTSD/SUD.
Other Names:
  • MSC
Experimental: Treatment as Usual
Selecting appropriate attention control groups for behavioral intervention research, particularly for mindfulness-based interventions, can be problematic. Comparator groups often also improve as they tend to target related mechanisms (e.g., social support, health behaviors, improved attention). After weighing the pros and cons, a "treatment as usual" (TAU) approach was selected, whereby the MSC will be compared to TAU. However, to control for the confound of weekly compensation, TAU participants will meet with study staff seven times over the 6-week period and fill out short psychosocial surveys on non-distressing topics (e.g., personality tests, attitudes surveys) in exchange for compensation commensurate with the MSC group. We believe this will also help with retention of the TAU group over time and strike an appropriate balance between controlling for the effects of study participation while minimizing confounds that often occur with active control groups in behavioral trials.
Selecting appropriate attention control groups for behavioral intervention research, particularly for mindfulness-based interventions, can be problematic. Comparator groups often also improve as they tend to target related mechanisms (e.g., social support, health behaviors, improved attention). After weighing the pros and cons, a "treatment as usual" (TAU) approach was selected, whereby the MSC will be compared to TAU. However, to control for the confound of weekly compensation, TAU participants will meet with study staff seven times over the 6-week period and fill out short psychosocial surveys on non-distressing topics (e.g., personality tests, attitudes surveys) in exchange for compensation commensurate with the MSC group. We believe this will also help with retention of the TAU group over time and strike an appropriate balance between controlling for the effects of study participation while minimizing confounds that often occur with active control groups in behavioral trials.
Other Names:
  • TAU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
PTSD symptoms will be measured using the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders, DSM-5 (PCL-5), which will be scored continuously and according to diagnostic criteria.2 The PCL-5 initially starts with the identification of the presence of exposure to a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-V traumatic event; assesses actual or threatened death, serious injury or sexual violence; and whether the person directly experienced it. Twenty additional items assess all four B-E criteria (re-experiencing, avoidance, negative thoughts or cognitions, hyperarousal), assessed on a Likert-type scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Treatment response will be defined as a ≥ 5-point reduction in symptoms and clinically meaningful improvement as ≥ 10-point reduction in symptoms. PTSD will be assessed for worse lifetime event and (if applicable) worst event in the past year.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
The AUDIT is part of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Common Data Elements for use in clinical trials. The Audit is a 10-item alcohol screen that helps identify persons who are hazardous drinkers or who have active alcohol use disorders. It can be calculated as a sum score and will be analyzed as a continuous and categorical (yes/no used alcohol) outcome.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
The DAST is a 10-item brief, self-report instrument for population screening, clinical case finding and treatment evaluation research. It can be used with adults and older youth. The DAST-10 yields a quantitative index of the degree of consequences related to drug abuse. The instrument takes approximately 5 minutes to administer and may be given in either a self-report or interview format. The DAST may be used in a variety of settings to provide a quick index of drug abuse problems. It will be evaluated continuously and as a categorical outcome (yes/no).
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Hopelessness Inventory
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This twenty-item measure has been widely used to assess hopelessness through a series of true/false statements (1, 0) that create a sum score.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Anxiety (PROMIS)
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This clinically valid, 7 item measure has been developed as part of the National Institute of Health (NIH) toolkit to assess anxiety in individuals 18 and older. Endpoints range from 1=never to 5=always. It can be used as a sum score and categorizes responses as "none to slight", "mild", "moderate," and "severe".
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Depression (PROMIS)
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This clinically valid, 8 item measure has been developed as part of the NIH toolkit to assess depression in the past two weeks. It assesses symptoms ranging from 1=never to 5=always and can be used in individuals 18 and older. It can be used as a sum score and categorizes responses as "none to slight", "mild", "moderate," and "severe".
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Loneliness (PROMIS)
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This clinically valid, five item measure was developed as part of the NIH toolkit to assesses feelings of social isolation on a five-point scale from 1=never to 5=not at all.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self Compassion Scale
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This twelve-item scale assesses self compassion on a scale of 1=almost never to 5=almost always. Items will be summed and used as a continuous measure.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This 18-item scale assesses emotion dysregulation on a scale from 1=almost never (0-10%) to 5=almost always (91-100%). It can be summed up (several items reverse coded) and also has six subscales: Nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This is a 15-item scale that assesses mindfulness on a scale of 1=almost always to 6=almost never. It is summed and used as a continuous measure.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Moral Injury and Distress Scale
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This six item scale measures moral injury on a scale from 0=not at all to 4=extremely. It is coded categorically (yes moral injury=1, no moral injury=0) and as a continuous outcome.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Craving
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Craving will be measured for alcohol, opioids, methamphetamine, marijuana, psychedelics or other substances (provide name) from 0=no craving at all to 100=maximum possible.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
Trauma-related Shame Inventory
Time Frame: T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)
This 24-item measure assesses trauma-related shame from 0=not true of me to 4=completely true for me. It is summed and analyzed as a continuous outcome.
T1 (baseline, enrollment), T2 (immediate follow-up), T3 (4-months post-baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified, quantitative data will be shared along with a codebook and data dictionary. Data will be completely deidentified.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Mindful Self Compassion

Subscribe