Association of Ex Vivo Drug Response ( EVDR) and Clinical Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (EXCYTE-2) (EXCYTE-2)

August 25, 2025 updated by: Exscientia AI Limited

Prospective Analysis of the Association of Drug Activity Measured in Viable Tumour Tissues ex Vivo and Clinical Response in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (EXCYTE-2)

This is a multicentre study on biobanked bone marrow and blood samples of AML patients, conducted by Exscientia GmbH. The study aims to compare the drug response measured 'ex vivo', this means outside of the body, in the samples and the documented outcome of the respective patient's clinical treatment. To measure this Ex Vivo Drug Response (EVDR), Exscientia will use it's AI-( Artificial Intelligence)-based precision medicine platform. In this platform, the cells of each sample are split and distributed in a number of small vials, to which different approved or experimental AML drugs are added. The cells are left with the drugs for a certain period of time (no culturing or expansion is done). After that, the cells are stained (coloured) by using specific dyes and the rates of dead cancer cells in each of these small vials is determined via automated microscopy. The EVDR shows how well the drugs killed the cancer cells in the sample. Taking clinical data into account, which is information on e.g. the patients health status or genetic markers, the EVDR could reveal which patients might especially benefit from the treatment.

If a reproducible correlation between the EVDR and the patient's clinical treatment outcome is found, the scFDS platform could be used in the future to improve treatment selection for AML patients.

The study will include biobanked samples from newly diagnosed patients, treated with cytarabine + daunorubicin (classical 7+3 or CPX-351) or venetoclax + azacitidine and after favourable results in an interim analysis, biobanked samples from R/R AML FLT3 mutant patients, treated with Gilteritinib might be included.

Key procedures include:

  • Viable tumour tissues (i.e. bone marrow or blood) taken prior to therapy are provided by biobanks to Exscientia's central lab (or delegated central laboratory),
  • Ex vivo drug response against commonly given standard of care drugs is evaluated in viable tumour tissues, Exscientia-owned drug candidates might be included in the assay for pre-clinical testing.
  • Clinical patient data are collected,
  • Relationship of EVDR to clinical response is evaluated.

Primary key hypothesis: Ex vivo drug response (EVDR) is significantly associated with Complete Response (CR).

Secondary key hypothesis: EVDR predicts achieving CR with 80% sensitivity and specificity.

The outcome of this observational clinical study will have broad implications both for the clinical routine, preclinical drug development, and translational cancer research. If a robust correlation between drug response measured ex vivo in tumour samples and clinical outcome can be identified, this will pave the way for:

  • the use of functional drug testing as a tool for personalised treatment decision making in the clinical routine, in particular where classical molecular precision medicine approaches fail to prioritise effective therapies, and
  • the use of human tumour samples as clinically relevant model systems for preclinical development of new drugs and translational cancer research that can potentially overcome the limited clinical relevance of mouse and other animal models.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8010
        • Medizinische Universität Graz
      • Vantaa, Finland, 01730
        • FHRB (Finnish Hematology Registry and Clinical Biobank)
      • Berlin, Germany, 12203
        • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study is planning to include biobanked samples of the following patient populations:

  1. Newly diagnosed fit AML patients (excl. APL), defined as treated with Cytarabine + Daunorubicin (classical 7+3 or CPX-351) independent or combination with GO or a TKI (e.g., Midostaurin).
  2. Newly diagnosed unfit AML patients, defined as treated with Venetoclax and Azacitidine (alone or in combination).

Upon favourable results in an interim analysis, R/R AML FLT3 mutant patients, treated with Gilteritinib, for which we expect different covariates exist, might also be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18 years or older.
  2. Signed informed consent form that permits use of sample in the proposed study (including permission for genetic analysis).
  3. Sample of a newly diagnosed patient (sample at time point diagnosis); after interim analysis the population may include samples from patients with FLT3 mutated relapsed/refractory AML.
  4. The sample may not be older than 5/ 10 years (depending on location)
  5. Confirmed diagnosed AML according to WHO or ICC criteria; after interim analysis the population may include FLT3 mutated R/R AML according to ELN 2022 criteria after interim analysis.
  6. Patient received one of the following therapies after sampling for which response data is available:

    1. 7 + 3 (with or without additional GO or TKIs)
    2. CPX-351
    3. Venetoclax and AZA in combination or alone
    4. If R/R AML, FLT3 mutated: treated with Gilteritinib
  7. Characteristics of sample taken prior to therapy as specified in the study protocol.
  8. Availability of complete dataset as specified in the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known or suspected HIV or active Hepatitis B and/or C infection or active COVID-19 infection (if information not available, samples can still be included) at time of sample collection.
  2. Known active infection of bone marrow.
  3. Known pregnancy.
  4. Received systemic anticancer treatment or radiotherapy within 4 weeks of sampling (pre-treatment of hydroxyurea and/or low dose cytarabine allowed).
  5. Patient is diagnosed with Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL).
  6. Patients with treatment for any other oncologic neoplasm at time of sample collection.
  7. Patients for whom CR could not be assessed (e.g. death before re-staging).
  8. Inclusion of samples from the same patient at both diagnosis and relapse is not permitted. In such cases, only the diagnostic sample is to be used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Newly diagnosed
Biobanked samples from AML patients taken at timepoint of initial diagnosis, before start of initial AML treatment.
No Intervention
R/R AML (FLT3-mutated)
Biobanked samples from AML patients at relaps or refractory diagnosis (only if FLT3-mutated))
No Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association between ex vivo drug response (EVDR) and clinical outcome (Complete Remission)
Time Frame: From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
To evaluate the association between EVDR measured using the Sponsor's scFDS platform in primary human AML samples and clinical outcomes, in particular complete remission, taking clinicopathological confounders into account.
From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarker and ex vivo drug response association
Time Frame: From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
Statistical association of established biomarkers (e.g. FLT3 mutations) and interaction between these markers and EVDR outcome.
From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
Technical success rate
Time Frame: From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
Percentage of patients meeting In-and Exclusion criteria as per protocol and for which an ex vivo drug response from sponsors single cell Functional drug Screening (scFDS) platform meeting Sponsor QC requirements could be obtained out of the total number of included patients.
From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
Prognostic value of EVDR of bone marrow or blood sample in CR prediction
Time Frame: From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months
To characterise the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of EVDR to predict clinical outcome based on optimal cut-offs. Specifically, we intend to evaluate the ability of EVDR to predict complete response with more than 80% sensitivity and specificity.
From date of sample receipt until the date of CR or first documented therapy outcome evaluation, if CR is not applicable and scFDS full data set is available, assessed up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nikolaus Krall, Dr., Exscientia GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Clinical Trials on No Interventions

Subscribe