Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Superior Rectal Mucosal Ligation and Hemorrhoids Ligation

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Hemorrhoids Ligation: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Endoscopic superior rectal mucosal ligation and hemorrhoids ligation are two types of endoscopic ligation, The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of these two approaches.If you accept this study,you need to provide case information before the operation, complete the endoscopic treatment according to the routine colonoscopy procedure, and follow-up survey after the operation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. According to the Goligher classification in the Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids (2020) , patients who are diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids .
  2. Patients who voluntarily participate and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who had severe heart, liver, and kidney disease.
  2. patients who had severe immune deficiency.
  3. patient's general condition is too poor to tolerate endoscopic therapy.
  4. patients had a history of pelvic chemoradiotherapy.
  5. patients had severe infection or inflammatory lesion in the rectum or anal canal,or the rectum or anal canal had undergone surgery.
  6. patient is a pregnant woman.
  7. patients who disagree with endoscopic treatment and are concerned about the possible risks refused to sign the informed consent form.
  8. the follow-up time is insufficient and the clinical data were incomplete.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Endoscopic superior rectal mucosal ligation group
The patient is treated with endoscopic superior rectal mucosal ligation
The patient takes the left side decubitus position, the endoscope is connected with 6 serial ligators, the cup of the sleeve is pointed at the upper edge of the straight anal line and the rectal mucosa is continuously aspirated under negative pressure. The mucosa enters the sleeve and sees a full-screen red sign. The sensing loop is successfully triggered, indicating that the loop is complete.
Active Comparator: Endoscopic hemorrhoid ligation group
The patient is treated with endoscopic hemorrhoids ligation
The patient takes the left side decubitus position,the endoscope is connected with 6 serial ligators,the cup the sleeve is aligned with the base of the hemorrhoid (above the dentate line) for continuous negative pressure suction.The hemorrhoid enters the sleeve and sees a full-screen red sign. Turn the handle of the sleeve clockwise and feel that the loop is successfully triggered, the ligature is completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complication
Time Frame: 7 days after operation
Postoperative complications, such as dysuria, thrombotic external hemorrhoids, perianal abscess,and so on.
7 days after operation
clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
Complete disappearance of postoperative symptoms is regarded as a cure, postoperative symptoms relief is regarded as partial cure, and symptoms as same as before are considered ineffective.
1 month after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The statistical results of the clinical data collected in the experiment (baseline characteristics, preoperative disease-related data, postoperative disease-relate)will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhoids

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic superior rectal mucosal ligation

Subscribe