Assessing Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Disease in Lung Transplant Recipients

November 11, 2024 updated by: Zhibin Xu, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease

Evaluating Ultra-Sensitive mNGS, Real-Time PCR, Galactomannan, and Lateral-Flow Device for Diagnosing Invasive Fungal Disease in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of different tests, including metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), real-time PCR, galactomannan assay, and lateral-flow device tests, in detecting invasive fungal disease in lung transplant recipients using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. The study is retrospective and cross-sectional in design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of various tests in detecting invasive fungal disease (IFD) in lung transplant recipients. The diagnostic methods under assessment include metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), galactomannan (GM) assay, and lateral-flow device (LFD) testing, all performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples. The study analyzes the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each method for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). The sample cohort consists of 109 lung transplant recipients, with data collected from January 2015 to April 2023

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent lung transplantation and were suspected of having invasive fungal infections (IPA or PJP) based on clinical symptoms, radiological findings, or microbiological results. The study includes adults aged 18 and above who were treated at a tertiary hospital from January 2015 to April 2023.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult lung transplant recipients aged 18 years and older.
  • Suspected cases of invasive fungal infection (invasive pulmonary aspergillosis or -Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia) based on clinical symptoms, radiological findings, or microbiological evidence.
  • Able to provide sufficient bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for diagnostic testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with confirmed non-fungal infections.
  • Patients unable to provide adequate BALF samples for analysis.
  • Patients with severe comorbidities that prevent study participation or completion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of mNGS for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia
Time Frame: From January 2015 to April 2023
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples.
From January 2015 to April 2023

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between mNGS and Other Methods
Time Frame: From January 2015 to April 2023.
Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, between mNGS, real-time PCR, Galactomannan (GM) assay, and lateral-flow device (LFD) tests for detecting IPA and PJP in lung transplant recipients.
From January 2015 to April 2023.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia

Subscribe