Intravenous Methocarbamol for Acute Pain After Spine Surgery (IMAPSS)

November 11, 2025 updated by: Paul Potnuru, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The goal of this target trial emulation is to evaluate the impact of intravenous (IV) methocarbamol on postoperative pain and opioid use in adults undergoing elective spine surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does IV methocarbamol reduce pain in the 6 hours following surgery?
  • Does IV methocarbamol decrease the need for opioid pain medications in the same period?

Participants who receive IV methocarbamol as part of their routine postoperative care will have their pain scores and opioid consumption tracked for 6 hours after treatment. Pain levels will be measured using standard assessments, and opioid use will be quantified in oral morphine equivalents.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The IMAPSS study is a target trial emulation evaluating the effect of intravenous (IV) methocarbamol on postoperative pain management and opioid consumption in adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. The study employs a target trial emulation design to simulate the conditions of a randomized controlled trial using observational data extracted from electronic medical records. The main focus is to determine if administering IV methocarbamol within two hours after surgery reduces postoperative pain scores and opioid use.

Patients will be tracked from the point of their first recorded pain score in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) after surgery to assess for treatment assignment eligibility. Data will be collected at 15-minute intervals, which corresponds to the standard assessment frequency in Phase I PACU care, for up to 12 hours postoperatively for each patient. The primary analysis will use time-varying propensity score matching (TV-PSM) to control for baseline and time-varying confounders. Pain levels will be measured using a time-weighted average (TWA) of pain scores, and opioid consumption will be quantified in oral morphine equivalents (OME).

The primary analysis will utilize TV-PSM, with propensity scores estimated through a Cox proportional hazards model. Matching will create balanced treatment groups at each 15-minute interval. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) will then estimate the effect of IV methocarbamol on the primary outcome (TWA pain) and secondary outcome (cumulative OME) over a 6-hour postoperative period. As a sensitivity analysis, a marginal structural model (MSM) using inverse probability weighting (IPW) will assess the robustness of the findings to the time-varying confounder adjustment.

This study's findings will aim to inform evidence-based recommendations for postoperative pain management and opioid-sparing strategies, potentially providing safer alternatives to conventional opioid-based regimens.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1270

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77007-1708
        • Memorial Hermann Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients undergoing elective spine surgeries at multiple hospitals within a large health system in Houston, TX. This includes individuals receiving surgical interventions for conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, or other spinal pathologies that require procedures like ACDF, posterior spinal fusion, or laminectomy. Participants will be selected from those who receive perioperative care across various hospital settings within the health system, including postoperative management in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Undergoing one of the following three elective spine surgeries: (i) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), (ii) Posterior Spinal Fusion, or (iii) Laminectomy, Laminotomy, or Discectomy
  • At least 8h of valid pain scores recorded postoperatively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency Surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Sensitivity to methocarbamol (allergy)
  • End-stage renal disease (ESRD)
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Missing a valid electronic anesthesia record

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IV methocarbamol
Patients who received intravenous methocarbamol
At least 500 mg of intravenous methocarbamol administered within 2 hours after the end of elective spine surgery for acute postoperative pain management
Other Names:
  • Robaxin
Usual Care
Patients who received usual postoperative pain management after surgery without any intravenous methocarbamol administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-Weighted Average Pain Score
Time Frame: 6 hours after treatment assignment
The primary outcome of this study is the Time-Weighted Average (TWA) pain score measured over the 6-hour period following treatment assignment. Pain scores are collected using a standardized numerical pain rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). These scores are assessed in 15-minute intervals, the standard frequency for Phase I PACU assessments, throughout the 6-hour follow-up period. The TWA pain score is calculated by averaging these pain ratings, giving greater weight to scores recorded more frequently or for longer periods. This method provides a comprehensive summary of the patient's pain experience over the observed time frame, accounting for fluctuations in pain intensity during recovery. A lower TWA score indicates better pain control and a potentially greater effect of the intervention.
6 hours after treatment assignment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Opioid Use
Time Frame: 6 hours after treatment assignment
The secondary outcome of this study is the cumulative opioid use measured in Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) over the 6-hour period following treatment assignment. Opioid doses administered during this timeframe are converted into OME to standardize and compare the total amount of opioids used, accounting for the specific medication, dose, and route of administration. Data on opioid administration are assessed in 15-minute intervals, aligned with standard PACU assessment practices. The cumulative OME reflects the total opioid exposure a patient received, providing a quantitative measure of opioid consumption and its potential reduction with the intervention. Lower cumulative OME values suggest more effective pain management with fewer opioids, indicating the potential benefits of non-opioid alternatives.
6 hours after treatment assignment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Potnuru, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) used in the publication of the results will be shared with interested researchers upon request when the required documentation is completed, and a review by the study team is completed and approved.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2025-January 2027

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A proposal that describes planned analyses must be submitted by email to the corresponding author. The study team will review the request before approval.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery

Clinical Trials on Intravenous Methocarbamol

Subscribe