Bone Augmentation Techniques in the Mandible Posterior Region

February 18, 2026 updated by: Antonio Lanata Flores, Universidad de Especialidades Espiritu Santo

Comparison of Bone Augmentation Techniques in the Mandibular Posterior Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study will compare three methods to rebuild lost bone in the back part of the lower jaw (posterior mandible) before dental implant placement. Seventy-eight adults will be randomly assigned to receive one of three "cortical shell" techniques using either the patient's own bone (autogenous) or prefabricated bone plates from animal (xenogeneic) or human donors (allogeneic). In all groups, the space inside the shell will be filled with a mixture of small bone chips and bone substitute material. The main outcome is the increase in jawbone width measured on 3D cone-beam CT scans at 6 months after surgery. Additional scans and clinical assessments up to 12 months will evaluate healing, bone stability, and postoperative recovery.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guayas
      • Samborondón, Guayas, Ecuador, 092301
        • Universidad Espiritu Santo
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio Lanata-Flores, Phd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Posterior mandibular edentulism requiring horizontal ridge augmentation (Cawood & Howell Classes IV-VI).

One or two eligible posterior mandibular sites suitable for cortical shell augmentation.

Adequate residual bone height to allow safe fixation above the mandibular canal.

Good general health (ASA I or II). Plaque index < 20% and absence of active periodontal infection. Ability and willingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits (up to 12 months). Written informed consent provided prior to any study-related procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

Uncontrolled systemic diseases affecting bone healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive disorders).

Current heavy smoking (>5 cigarettes/day). Pregnancy or lactation. Current use of medications known to affect bone metabolism or healing (e.g., bisphosphonates, long-term corticosteroids, anticoagulants).

Active periodontal disease or untreated oral infection. History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the head and neck region.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Autogenous Cortical Shell Graft
Thin cortical bone plates harvested from the mandibular ramus will be fixed to the recipient ridge with titanium microscrews to form a cortical shell. The internal space will be filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and xenogeneic particulate graft. This conventional technique represents the control group for comparison with xenogeneic and allogeneic materials.
Surgical reconstruction of atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using thin cortical plates fixed with titanium microscrews to form a biologic shell. The inner space is filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and biomaterial. Depending on the study group, the cortical plates are autogenous (from the mandibular ramus), xenogeneic (bovine origin), or allogeneic (human donor).
Other Names:
  • Shell technique
  • 3D Onlay bone graft
Experimental: Xenogeneic Cortical Shell Graft
Prefabricated bovine cortical laminae will be rehydrated, trimmed to contour, and fixed with titanium microscrews to the mandibular ridge. The enclosed space will be filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and xenogeneic particulate graft to promote bone regeneration.
Surgical reconstruction of atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using thin cortical plates fixed with titanium microscrews to form a biologic shell. The inner space is filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and biomaterial. Depending on the study group, the cortical plates are autogenous (from the mandibular ramus), xenogeneic (bovine origin), or allogeneic (human donor).
Other Names:
  • Shell technique
  • 3D Onlay bone graft
Experimental: Allogenic Onlay bone graft
A allogenic onlay cortical sheets will be adapted to the defect site, and fixed with titanium microscrews. The internal space will be filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and xenogeneic particulate graft, following the same standardized protocol as the other groups.
Surgical reconstruction of atrophic posterior mandibular ridges using thin cortical plates fixed with titanium microscrews to form a biologic shell. The inner space is filled with a 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone chips and biomaterial. Depending on the study group, the cortical plates are autogenous (from the mandibular ramus), xenogeneic (bovine origin), or allogeneic (human donor).
Other Names:
  • Shell technique
  • 3D Onlay bone graft

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Horizontal Bone Gain (mm) Measured by CBCT
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Linear horizontal bone gain at the grafted posterior mandibular ridge, measured on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using standardized reference points. Measurements will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery by two calibrated, blinded examiners. Mean values per site will be compared among the three groups (autogenous, xenogeneic, allogeneic).
3, 6, and 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Duration (minutes)
Time Frame: Day 0 (intraoperative measurement)
Total surgical time for each bone augmentation procedure, measured from the first anesthetic injection to the final suture. Timing will be recorded using a standardized chronometer to compare operative efficiency across autogenous, xenogeneic, and allogeneic cortical shell techniques.
Day 0 (intraoperative measurement)
Bone Density (Hounsfield Units) on CBCT
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Bone density within the grafted area will be measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) gray-scale analysis (Hounsfield unit equivalents). Segmentation and density quantification will be performed at standardized points within the augmented region by two blinded examiners.
3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Postoperative Inflammation (mm Facial Measurement)
Time Frame: Preoperative, immediate postoperative, days 3, 7, and 14
Postoperative swelling will be assessed by measuring the linear distance from the lip commissure to the tragus with a flexible tape. Measurements will be taken bilaterally under standardized conditions by the same examiner to evaluate differences among groups.
Preoperative, immediate postoperative, days 3, 7, and 14
Volumetric Bone Gain (mm³)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Three-dimensional volumetric changes of the augmented area will be calculated by superimposing pre- and postoperative CBCT-derived meshes using surface registration software. The difference in total reconstructed volume (ΔVolume) will quantify the amount of new bone formation across techniques.
3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Morphometric Surface Deviation (mm)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Surface deviation between pre- and postoperative 3D models will be analyzed using color-coded distance maps and point-to-surface metrics (mean absolute distance, RMS error, and 95th-percentile distance). This quantifies contour stability and remodeling patterns for each graft material.
3, 6, and 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Yes, De-identified participant data and analysis code will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication, following UEES data-sharing policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the main results and will remain accessible for 5 years thereafter through the institutional repository of Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo (UEES).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to the anonymized dataset, protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, and analytic code by contacting the corresponding author at alanataf@uees.edu.ec. Requests will be reviewed by the study team and the UEES Ethics Committee to ensure compliance with ethical and privacy regulations. Approved users will receive controlled access to the data for non-commercial research purposes only.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Grafting

Clinical Trials on Cortical Shell Bone Grafting

Subscribe