GBR Versus Allogenic Bone Block

December 15, 2025 updated by: Algirdas Puisys, DDS, PhD

Allogenic Bone Blocks and Particulate Graft for Horizontal Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to compare two different methods used to augment bone in the posterior lower jaw prior to implant placement in patients with insufficient bone width. Eligible patients were included in the study and received a horizontal bone augmentation with one of two methods, which differed in the materials used for the bone augmentation. The group allocation was randomised. After 6 months of healing following parameters were assessed: histological evaluation, survival of the bone graft, the need for further bone augmentation at the time of implant placement, changes in soft tissue characteristics, radiologically and clinically assessed changes in bone width.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the histological, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of particulate bone substitutes versus allogenic bone block grafts for primary bone augmentation in the posterior mandible.

Materials and Methods: This randomised controlled clinical trial included adult patients in need for a staged bone augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior mandible. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatments groups. Patients allocated in the BBL group received allogenic bone blocks, whereas patients in the GBR group received allogenic bone granules for the primary bone augmentation. In both groups grafting materials were covered with a resorbable collagen membrane, which was fixated with non-resorbable fixation pins. The primary outcome of this study was defined as the composition of the histological samples at least 6 months after the primary bone augmentation. Secondary outcomes included graft survival rates, the need for further augementation procedures at time of implant placement, soft tissue measurements and radiographically and clinically analyzed changes in bone width and radiographically analyzed changes in bone volume. These outcomes were measured at baseline (prior to bone augmentation surgery) and at the follow-up (at least 6 months after bone augmentation).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥18 years
  • Insufficient bone width in posterior mandible requiring staged bone augmentation prior to implant placement
  • Minimum of 1 mm bone width available
  • Willing to provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Known or suspected incompliance
  • Patients smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day
  • Systemic diseases or medications affecting bone metabolism (such as osteoporosis, intake of bisphosphonates)
  • Active periodontal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: allogenic bone blocks
Patients in this group received allogenic bone blocks for the primary bone augmentation procedure.
An allogenic bone blocks were used for the primary bone augmentation procedure.
Active Comparator: allogenic cancellous bone granules
Patients in this group received allogenic cancellous bone granules for the primary bone augmentation procedure.
allogenic cancellous bone granules were used for the primary bone augmentation procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histological composition
Time Frame: 6 months
Histological samples were obtained at the time of reentry for implant placement at least 6 months after the primary bone augmentation procedure. Sample analysis included the measurement of the total sample area, the area of identified bone, biomaterial and soft tissue per sample. Furthermore, the percentage of bone, biomaterial and soft tissue per sample was calculated.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for further augmentation procedures at the time of implant placement
Time Frame: 6 months
The need for further soft and hard tissue augmentation procedures at the time of implant placement was evaluated at the time of implant placement.
6 months
Keratinized tissue height
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
keratinized tissue height measured with a periodontal probe at baseline and follow-up.
Baseline and 6 months
Vertical soft tissue thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
the vertical soft tissue thickness measured with a periodontal probe at baseline and follow-up.
Baseline and 6 months
Clinically measured bone width
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
the bucco-oral bone width measured with a periodontal probe at baseline and follow-up.
Baseline and 6 months
Radiologically measured bone width
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Bucco-oral bone width in the augmented region was measured on baseline and follow-up CBCTs.
Baseline and 6 months
Changes in bone volume
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
CBCT images prior to bone augmentation and after the healing period were superimposed. The changes in bone volume in the augmented area were measured.
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Grafting

Clinical Trials on allogenic bone blocks

Subscribe