Evaluating the Utility of Bone Grafts in Open Wedge Corrective Osteotomy and Plate Fixation (WOPPeR)

June 10, 2024 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Evaluating the Utility of Bone Grafts in Open Wedge Corrective Osteotomy and Plate Fixation in Patients With Malunited Distal Radius Fractures

INTRODUCTION A variety of bone grafts and substitutes are available for filling bone defects in the distal radius after corrective osteotomy, but the harvesting of bone from the iliac crest is the gold standard as it allows easy access to corticocancellous bone of a desirable quality and quantity. The idea behind bone grafting is to provide optimal bone formation and structural stability, which is crucial for bone healing. However, the harvesting and use of bone from the iliac crest potentially comes with the risk of complications such as delayed union of the osteotomy defect; size mismatch between the graft and the osteotomy defect; longer operation time; donor site morbidity including nerve, arterial, and ureteral injury; herniation of abdominal contents; sacroiliac joint instability; pelvic fractures; hematoma and infection. As these disadvantages of bone grafting can have a major impact on patients' everyday lives, research is needed on whether bone grafting is genuinely necessary during corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of the distal radius

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to investigate whether harvested bone graft from the iliac crest necessary is during corrective osteotomy and plate fixation in patients with malunited distal radius fractures.

STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Patients will undergo the following examinations once before the operation and five times afterwards: 1) the patients will fill out three questionnaires, 2) complications will be noted, 3) the wrist function will be measured, and 4) radiographs/CT scans will be made.

STUDY POPULATION All patients over the age of 18 years who have a symptomatic malunion after distal radius fracture and are eligible for surgical correction.

INTERVENTION Surgical correction in the form of open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without bone grafting.

USUAL CARE Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting bone from the iliac crest.

OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes: complications and quality of life. Secondary outcomes: time to complete bone healing, functional outcomes, and cost effectiveness.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Limburg
      • Maastricht, Zuid-Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either sex over the age of 18 years
  • Symptomatic malunion of the distal radius
  • Eligible for open wedge osteotomy and plate fixation with or without bone grafting from iliac crest.
  • Patients are able to undergo postoperative follow-up of at least 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who have known systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration
  • Patients who take chronic use of glucocorticoids.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving bone grafting
Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.
Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation with harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.
Active Comparator: Patients with symptomatic malunion of distal radius receiving none bone grafts
Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without harvesting and using bone from the iliac crest.
Open wedge corrective osteotomy and plate fixation without bone grafting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: follow-up period of at least one year
number and severity during and after the operation
follow-up period of at least one year
Quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: follow-up period of one year
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
follow-up period of one year
Time to complete bone healing
Time Frame: follow-up period of one year
Bone healing will be considered complete when the osteotomy gap is filled with bone formation.
follow-up period of one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective functional outcomes
Time Frame: follow-up period of one year
Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH): measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms in activities of daily living
follow-up period of one year
Subjective functional outcome
Time Frame: follow-up period of one year
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) Questionnaire: measure of self-rated wrist pain and disability in activities of daily living
follow-up period of one year
Objective functional outcomes
Time Frame: follow-up period of one year
Active range of motion
follow-up period of one year
Cost effectiveness
Time Frame: follow-up period of at least one year
cost-effectiveness analysis
follow-up period of at least one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malunion of Fracture of Radius

Clinical Trials on Group with bone grafting

Subscribe