Computer-guided vs. Conventional Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Augmentation

February 14, 2023 updated by: Dina Ayman, Future University in Egypt

Assessment of Horizontal Bone Gain Using Computer-guided vs. Conventional Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Augmentation

this study aims to evaluate horizontal bone augmentation achieved at the anterior maxilla using computer-guided cortical shell bone technique and accuracy of fixation of the bone shell away from the atrophic ridge by a calculated distance which is always a challenging step for inexperienced surgeons to fix a cortical shell at the ideal position in the conventional protocol it was never guided to be precisely fixed at the proper position and angulation the problem is if it fixed with insufficient distance with proposed volume loss leads to totally insufficient volume gain for future implant placement also to evaluate the efficacy of the CAD/CAM surgical guide during chin harvesting procedures in reducing the risk of anatomical structure damage and patient morbidity with more accuracy compared with the standard technique. this trial versus free hand conventional cortical shell bone technique both harvested from symphysis area (chin).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tooth extraction may be due to a variety of causes such as badly decayed, periodontal disease, and trauma whatever the reason tooth loss is always followed by loss of masticatory force and muscle stimulation to the alveolar bone so according to Wolff's Law (Wolff, 1892) loss of mechanical stimulation is followed by the reduction of bone mass.

Several surgical protocols have been used to manage horizontal maxillary alveolar bone atrophy such as bone splitting and bone spreading techniques with or without filling the created space, onlay bone graft, guided bone regeneration using resorbable or non-resorbable membrane, distraction osteogenesis, and shell bone block technique which use a thin cortical bone shell to reshape the atrophied ridge and protect the particulate bone graft.

Despite the popularity of this technique, it usually requires high surgical skills, prolonged intra-operative time, and unfortunately has some technical drawbacks. Such as lack of anatomical guidance during bone harvesting which may lead to injury to the important vital structure and lack of guidance during fixation may lead to improperly positioned, tilted, or rotated shell or even leaving an undesired distance between the shell and deficient ridge

With the increasing use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), intra and extra oral scanner for patient data acquisition, and complete digital workflow in clinical practice and it is rapidly becoming the standard of care in dentistry. Regarding bone augmentation as preparation for future implant placement. computer-aided surgery has been an innovation that enables clinicians to have firm and accurate treatment planning. Also, milling or 3D printing methods allow variable techniques for the fabrication of surgical templates.

This study aims to fully digitalize such technique using patient-specific surgical guides to allow for accurate graft harvesting and positioning and to minimize intraoperative time and complications associated with this procedure

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • future university in Egypt, faculty of dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient free from any systemic condition.
  • Edentulous anterior maxilla with a horizontal deficient alveolar ridge that is less than 4 mm measured from outer buccal cortices to outer palatal cortices.
  • Highly motivated patients are willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intra bony lesions (e.g. Cysts) or infections(e.g.abcess) that may retard the osteotomy healing.
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Uncooperative patients.
  • Patients with any diseases or taking any medications that compromise bone healing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anterior maxillary bone augmentation using computer guided autogenous cortical shell technique.
a patient-specific guide was used to harvest a chin cortical shell which was also prepared and positioned at the (anterior horizontally atrophied maxilla) recipient site using another patient-specific positioning guide.
using a patient-specific surgical guide to harvest bone cortical shell from the chin and another patient-specific surgical guide to fix it in the atrophied maxillary anterior area
Active Comparator: Anterior maxilla bone augmentation using free hand autogenous cortical shell technique.
the horizontally atrophic anterior maxilla was augmented with a cortical shell technique the bone was harvested from the chin without a patient-specific guide.
Augmentation of horizontal deficient anterior maxilla using the conventional protocol of cortical shell technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alveolar ridge horizontal net bone gain
Time Frame: 4 months
volumetric change of deficient alveolar ridge after augmentation
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
surgical procedure accuracy
Time Frame: immediate post operative
depening on the superimposition between immediate postoperative CBCT scan over planning
immediate post operative
intraoperation time
Time Frame: at time of surgery
duration of surgery
at time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FUE.REC (23)\11-2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

the data will be available from the corresponding author upon resonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Resorption

3
Subscribe