- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06662903
Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh Vs Bone Cement
A Comparative Study Between Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh Vs Bone Cement
The aim of this study is:
To compare the surgical outcomes between titanium mesh and bone cement in cranioplasty.
To assess the complication rates associated with each material. To evaluate patient satisfaction and aesthetic results post-surgery
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure performed to repair skull vault defects.
The skull vault defects may result mostly after traumatic injuries as depressed skull fractures, Tumor removal (infiltrating skull bones), decompressive craniectomies, congenital anomalies or inflammatory lesions.
At present, there is no gold standard material for cranioplasty with the use of autologous bone as well as other synthetic materials as bone cement and titanium mesh.
Bone cement is malleable, lightweight, strong, and heat resistant, but it may cause burn injury during the process of its preparation and is used for relatively small defects.
Titanium mesh good mechanical strength, a low infection rate, and an acceptable cost but may cause metal allergy, tissue erosion, implant exposure, and deformity upon application of external force.
Cranioplasty not only provides Brain protection and cosmetic aspects but also, decrease incidence of epilepsy, relief to psychological drawbacks and increases social performance, restoring the dynamics of CSF.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Osman Hassan Zafraan, Resident doctor
- Phone Number: +201220993578
- Email: docosmanhassan@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Asyut, Egypt
- Assuit University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients requiring cranioplasty for a skull defect due to Decompressive Craniectomy, trauma, tumor resection, or congenital issues.
- All ages .
- Both sex.
- Informed consent obtained from all participants.
- Patient fit for surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with active infection at the surgical site
- Patient Unfit for surgery.
- Patient refuse consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Titanium mesh
this group is operated using titanium mesh
|
Cranioplasty using titanium mesh
|
|
Active Comparator: Bone cement
this group is operated using bone cement
|
Cranioplasty using bone cement
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction using patient ssatisfaction grade
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 1 years
|
Patients satisfaction (cosmetic, psychological, neurologic ) measered by validate questionnaire post-opeartive and follow up using Patient satisfaction grade from Excellent to not satisfied
|
through study completion, an average 1 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Infection
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 1 years
|
follow up rate of post operative infection
|
through study completion, an average 1 years
|
|
Reoperation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 1 years
|
rate of reoperation after using each material a post-operative follow up
|
through study completion, an average 1 years
|
|
CSF leak
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 1 years
|
post-operative complication of CSF leak due to changes in Dynamics of CSF flow
|
through study completion, an average 1 years
|
|
complications
Time Frame: through study completion, an average 1 years
|
post-operative as hematoma formation , neurologic defict and fits.
|
through study completion, an average 1 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ. Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011 Jul;2(2):162-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83584.
- Mousa M, Eissa S, Raslan M, Abu ElNaga B, Balaha A. Evaluation of three different methods of cranioplasty; a comparative prospective randomized study. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021;16
- Andrabi SM, Sarmast AH, Kirmani AR, Bhat AR. Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome - An institutional experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2017 May 26;8:91. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_45_17. eCollection 2017.
- Capitelli-McMahon H, Kahlar N, Rahman S. Titanium Versus Autologous Bone-Based Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 May 26;15(5):e39516. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39516. eCollection 2023 May.
- Alkhaibary A, Alharbi A, Alnefaie N, Oqalaa Almubarak A, Aloraidi A, Khairy S. Cranioplasty: A Comprehensive Review of the History, Materials, Surgical Aspects, and Complications. World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.211. Epub 2020 May 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cranioplasty
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty
-
Universidade do PortoCompletedDecompressive Craniectomy and CranioplastyPortugal
-
Renovo Concepts, Inc.RecruitingClinical Need for Craniotomy or Craniectomy | Clinical Need for CranioplastyUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompleted
-
RenJi HospitalShenzhen Second People's Hospital; Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao...Active, not recruitingCraniotomy | Epidural Hematoma | Brain Herniation | Decompressive CraniectomyChina
-
RenJi HospitalShenzhen Second People's Hospital; Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao...RecruitingCraniotomy | Epidural Hematoma | Decompressive CraniectomyChina
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedBrain Injuries | Treatment Outcome | Decompressive CraniectomyFrance
-
RenJi HospitalZhujiang Hospital; Clinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | Subdural Effusion | Decompressive CraniectomyChina
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Active, not recruitingBrain Injury | Rehabilitation | Acquired Brain Injury | Brain Injury, Acute | Craniectomy | Neurorehabilitation | Cognitive Disorders | Cranioplasty | Rehabilitation Outcome | Neuropsychological Deficits | Cognitive Deficit Following Brain LesionsItaly
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownTrauma | Disability Physical | CranioplastyEgypt
-
Abyrx, Inc.Not yet recruitingPost-operative Complications | Cranioplasty | Cranial Bone | Cranial Fixation | Adhesive Bone Cement
Clinical Trials on Cranioplasty with Titanium mesh
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanActive, not recruitingOrbital DeformityEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityActive, not recruitingBone Loss, Alveolar | Ridge Augmentaton and Dental ImplantsEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedEdentulous; Alveolar Process, AtrophyEgypt
-
Misr International UniversityActive, not recruitingBone Augmentation | Badly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for ExtractionEgypt
-
Basma AlsheikhCompletedAlveolar Bone AtrophyEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedBlow-Out FracturesEgypt
-
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityMeizhou People's Hospital; Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University and other collaboratorsRecruitingEfficacy and Safety of Additive Manufacturing Personalized Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone RegenerationAlveolar Bone Atrophy | Guided Bone RegenerationChina
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingBone Loss, AlveolarEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown