Prospective, Observational Real-world Treatments of AEDH in Large-scale Surgical Cases (PORTALS-AEDH)

October 29, 2021 updated by: RenJi Hospital

A Real World, Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study to Compare Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments in Patients With Acute Epidural Hematoma

This is a multicenter, prospective, and observational real-world study aimed at investigating the current situation of surgical treatments and prognosis for acute epidural hematoma in China, and analyzing the optimization of therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The incidence of Acute Epidural Hematoma (AEDH) among traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients has been reported to be in the range of 2.7 to 4%. The mortality in patients in all age groups and GCS scores undergoing surgery for evacuation of EDH is approximately 10%.

Most people with EDH are generally expected to have a good clinical outcome with the prompt and correct treatment. However, AEDH still represents a potentially life-threatening condition when a local mass effect exists due to rapidly elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulted from the rapid build-up of blood. Brain hernia and cerebral infarction might occur and lead to a terrible clinical outcome. In addition, there is a set of patients who experience clinical deterioration after an initial hematoma-evacuation craniotomy because of secondary brain injuries, including massive cerebral infarction (MCI), additional decompressive craniectomy is recommended as soon as possible.

Although DC can reduce the morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with a sTBI, the removal of the bone flap is not necessary for the majority of patients with AEDH, because of the relatively low incidence of MCI secondary to AEDH. Recommendations indicated an epidural hematoma greater than 30 ml should be surgically evacuated regardless of the patient's GCS score. Although craniotomy provides a complete evacuation to remove the clot of the hematoma, there are insufficient data to support a specific surgical treatment method. The choice of operative technique is influenced by the surgeon's expertise, training, and evaluation of a particular situation. Therefore, there is a clinical rationale for investigating the current status of surgical treatments and prognosis for AEDH, thereby providing a reliable reference for the optimization of therapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
        • Contact:
          • Junfeng Feng
          • Phone Number: +8613611860825

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population who were diagnosed with acute epidural hematoma and necessary for undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clear medical history of traumatic brain injury;
  2. within 12 hours after injury;
  3. Supratentorial unilateral acute epidural hematoma on first head CT scan examination;
  4. The admitting neurosurgeon considers that the epidural hematoma needs to be evacuated with surgical treatment;
  5. With informed consent to surgery and trial participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous intracranial surgery prior to trauma;
  2. Patients with a score of 3 on the GCS, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis or defective coagulation, or an injury that was deemed to be unsurvivable;
  3. CT demonstrates associated other intracranial hematomas e.g. subdural, intracerebral hemorrhage, or large size infarction, which are the main causes of operation;
  4. Patients who had injury of the oculomotor nerve;
  5. Severe pre-existing disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient is supposed to a good recovery from the TBI;
  6. Pregnant female.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GOSE (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) scores
Time Frame: at 6 months post-injury

The primary outcome is indicated by the long-term functional outcomes, including overall mortality and the score on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E), "Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale" is the unabbreviated scale title. The minimum value of scale is score 1, and maximum value is scored 8, higher scores mean a better outcome and lower scores mean worse outcome. Specific scored as follows:

  1. death;
  2. persistent vegetative state;
  3. lower severe disability;
  4. upper severe disability; (stratum 3 and 4 were considered as severe disability, with permanent requirement for help with daily living);
  5. lower moderate disability;
  6. upper moderate disability; (stratum 5 and 6 were considered as mild disability, without a need for assistance in everyday life, that might, however, require special equipment for employment);
  7. lower good recovery;
  8. upper good recovery (stratum 7 and 8 were considered as good recovery).
at 6 months post-injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of post-operative cerebral infarction
Time Frame: within 6 months post-injury
The incidence of traumatic AEDH post-operative cerebral infarction within 6 months post-injury, which is primarily diagnosed by independent radiologists with CT or MRI examination.
within 6 months post-injury
incidence of additional craniocerebral surgery
Time Frame: within 6 months post-injury
The incidence of additional craniocerebral surgery within 6 months post-injury, related to clinical deterioration after initial surgical treatment of AEDH.
within 6 months post-injury
length of stay in ICU and hospital
Time Frame: within 6 months post-injury
The duration of hospitalization after initial surgery within 6 months post-injury, including ICU and hospital stays.
within 6 months post-injury
detailed economic evaluation
Time Frame: within 6 months post-injury
Total medical expense related to treatment of AEDH, including the costs of operations, hospitalization and rehabilitation within 6 months post-injury.
within 6 months post-injury
incidence of serious adverse events
Time Frame: within 6 months post-injury

Serious adverse events (SAE) is defined as an untoward occurrence that:

  1. results in death
  2. is life-threatening
  3. requires hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalization
  4. results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity
  5. is otherwise considered medically significant by the investigator.
within 6 months post-injury
quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: at 6 months post-injury
Unabbreviated scale title is "5-level EuroQol five dimensions" questionnaire. The EQ-5D is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
at 6 months post-injury
MMSE (mini-mental state examination) scores
Time Frame: at 6 months post-injury
MMSE (mini-mental state examination) scores at 6 months post-injury.
at 6 months post-injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jiyao Jiang, Professor, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Craniotomy

3
Subscribe