Virtual Agent Feasibility in Oncology Patients (NTT Data)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Duke University

A Randomized Pilot Study Comparing the Feasibility of Using a Virtual Agent vs. an Off-site Human Agent to Onboard Oncology Patients to a Remote Monitoring Device

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of a virtual agent vs. a human agent when onboarding oncology patients over the telephone to Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) devices. RPM devices are instruments that a patient can use to measure their own weight and vital signs. Both the virtual and human agents will be available by telephone to instruct the patient on how to use the RPM devices to measure weight, blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation. Patients will be randomized to either the virtual or human agent, have assessments of their medical and oncological history, overall well-being, body measurements, and vital signs, and will complete questionnaires about their experience.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent and HIPAA authorization for the release of personal health information.
  2. Age ≥18
  3. Cancer (solid tumor)
  4. Planning to return to Duke Cancer Center clinic for three days in a row

    • Patients whose treatment does not require that they return to clinic for three days in a row, but who are willing to voluntarily return to participate in this study are permitted to enroll.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-2
  6. Native fluency of spoken English as determined by the investigator

    • Non-native English speakers are permitted to enroll if they have achieved native fluency.
  7. Vitals as collected by the clinic using Duke maintained equipment must be within the ranges specified by the remote patient monitoring devices.

    • Weight ≤ 180 kg
    • Systolic blood pressure ≤ 300 mmHg
    • Pulse rate of 40-200 bpm
    • SpO2 of 70-100%
    • Temperature 34.0-42.2°C
  8. Arm circumference of 22-42 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. 1. Vision, speech, auditory, physical, cognitive or other impairment that has the potential to interfere with the use of the remote patient monitoring device or agent, in the opinion of the investigator or study coordinator.
  2. Has an implanted pacemaker, arterio-venus (A-V) shunt, a history of mastectomy or lymph node clearance, history of severe blood flow problems or blood disorders, or a history of severe circulatory deficit in the arm.
  3. Is pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual agent
The virtual agent is an interactive audio agent that is similar to voice agents that interact with callers in many industries today. They create a very human-like interaction in contrast to more traditional virtual call agents that can only respond to menu options (e.g. "choose "1" for appointments, choose "2" for questions about your bill", etc.). The virtual agent is engineered to accomplish the very specific task of onboarding the patient on use of the RPM devices. It is trained to understand normal human English speech, detects emotional tone and frustration of callers, and is trained to deescalate when appropriate.
Active Comparator: Human agent
The human agent will onboard the patient on use of the RPM devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of virtual agent vs. human agent for onboarding patients to RPM devices as assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3
The SUS is a questionnaire that assesses perceived usability. It includes 10 five-point items with alternating positive and negative tone. The final score is a number 0-100 with a higher score indicating better usability.
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description of the patient experience when using a virtual agent in the context of teaching a patient as assessed by the patient experience survey.
Time Frame: Day 3
The patient experience survey includes 3 open-ended questions about experience with the training process, input on using monitoring devices at home, and any other important information for the researchers to know. Descriptive analysis will be conducted within each arm.
Day 3
Identification of opportunities to improve the use of a virtual agent in the context of teaching a patient as assessed by the patient experience survey.
Time Frame: Day 3
The patient experience survey includes 3 open-ended questions about experience with the training process, input on using monitoring devices at home, and any other important information for the researchers to know. Descriptive analysis will be conducted within each arm.
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Alder, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Virtual agent

Subscribe