- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06689553
Percutaneously Delivered Automated Continual Fluid Removal System in Patients With Advanced Diuretic-Resistant Heart Failure (CLEAR-HF)
A Multi-Center, Multinational, Prospective, Open-Label, Single Arm, Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility, Safety and Tolerability of a Percutaneously Delivered Automated Continual Fluid Removal System in Patients With Advanced Diuretic-Resistant Heart Failure
The study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, tolerability and functionality of a percutaneously delivered automated continual fluid removal System in up to 8 patients with Heart Failure (HF) and diuretic resistance.
Intervention: Implanted absorption chamber, connected to an external pump. Follow up: 6 months post activation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives: To assess the feasibility, safety, tolerability and functionality of an intra-peritoneal, mechanically induced ultrafiltration system (IPUDx), through the analysis of procedure and device related serious adverse events and device function.
Study Duration: Up to 24 months. Enrolment 15 months, Activation following implantation (per patient) up to 1 month, Follow-up (per patient) 6 months, Close-out 2 months.
Number of Subjects: Up to 8 Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria: Patients with fluid overloaded congested heart failure (The New York Heart Association Class II-IV) with diuretic resistance and a history of multiple heart failure related admissions.
Study Centers: Up to 5 Medical Centers in Serbia and Spain.
Study Product and Planned Use: The Paragate Medical IPUDx System comprises an intraperitoneally implanted fluid absorption chamber with an external wearable rechargeable pump, drainage bag and controller.
The system induces isotonic fluid loss across the peritoneal membranes which is collected in the fluid absorption chamber and transported to a daily disposable external fluid drainage bag.
Statistical Methodology: No statistical hypothesis is proposed. Safety will be evaluated using a complete description of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). A descriptive analysis will be performed for all primary and secondary variables of the study for the basal measures and all post-basal measures. Interim analysis for all the study endpoints will be performed at the completion of the active follow up phase (3 months post activation). Safety analysis for Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) will be performed both at 3-month post activation and at the completion of maintenance phase (6 months post implantation).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 21 years of age
- Life expectancy > 6 months
- Heart Failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV
- > 1 HF related admissions in the last 12 months
- Fluid congestion (2 signs of pitting oedema, jugular distention, BW elevation, nocturnal dyspnoea score, respiration rate, pulmonary congestion and/or pleural effusion per chest x-ray, ascites)
- Failure to achieve effective diuresis and congestion relief despite appropriate or escalating diuretic doses or combination of diuretics
- Able to give written informed consent
- Ability to comply with study procedures and ability to operate the device themselves or by a regular caregiver support
- Residence in proximity to the medical center to ensure easy access for required hospital visits and to enable home visits
- Women of childbearing potential should use adequate contraception for as long as the device is implanted
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any non-cardiac disease with life expectancy < 1 year
- Any patient listed for solid organ transplantation
- Patients with a history, or with an indication for mechanical circulatory support
intravenous (IV) inotropes required in last 3 months (INTERMACS Score
- 3), excluding Levosimendan
- Immunocompromised (e.g. chronic steroid treatment, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), etc.)
- Insulin dependent diabetes with evidence of infection
- Severe hyponatremia as defined by a serum Sodium < 120 mmol/l
- Serum Albumin < 2.5 g/Dl
- Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 20 ml/min/1.73m2 by MDRD method, using MDRD 4-variable equation that includes age, sex, ethnicity, and serum creatinine
- Previous significant intraabdominal surgery, severe abdominal adhesions, intra-abdominal foreign body (except for small inguinal mesh)
- Current or historical (within last 6 months) large diaphragmatic hernia, or surgically irreparable, complex or recurring hernia
- 6 minutes walk test of less than 100 meters in all repeated testing (if applicable), or similar test
- Severe, multiple repeated cardiac-related ascites, subject to principal investigator (PI) discretion
- Inflammatory or ischemic bowel disease (i.e., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) and frequent episodes of diverticulitis
- Current gastrointestinal active infection in the body (such as Clostridium difficile infection)
- Gastrointestinal haemorrhage within the last 4 months
- Bacterial peritonitis episode within the last 24 months
- > 2 systemic or local infections, such as urinary tract infection or abdominal skin infection within the last 6 months
- Class B or C liver cirrhosis of non-cardiac aetiology
- 18.5 > body mass index (BMI) > 40 presenting a risk for surgery
Patients with contraindications for general/local anaesthesia, sedation and
- or Percutaneous / Laparoscopic surgery
- Unsuitability for self-maintenance of the experimental home set-up
- Presence of any current cancer, subject to PI discretion
- Presence of any active implantable or body-worn devices that cannot be removed excluding Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) / pacemaker, subject to PI discretion
- Known hypersensitivity to Nitinol nickel/titanium alloy and brilliant blue
- Pregnancy
- Patients being in another therapeutic clinical study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intraperitoneal implanted device
Implantation and activation of an automated continual water removal system
|
The intraperitoneal device is percutaneously implanted via mini laparotomy, under local anaesthesia and sedation, and connected to the wearable rechargeable pump through extracorporeal tubing.
The device aims to remove excess fluids in heart failure patients with diuretic resistance
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analysis of AEs related to implantation
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
based on analysis of the incidence of serious adverse events related to the implantation procedure.
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Serious Adverse Events related to the device
Time Frame: 3 months post activation and 6 months from implantation
|
Based on the incidence of serious adverse events related to the device
|
3 months post activation and 6 months from implantation
|
|
Successful Implantation Rate
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
based on post-insertion imaging confirmation utilizing imaging modalities such as X-rays to confirm the appropriate placement and positioning of the chamber within the peritoneal cavity (appropriate placement yes/no)
|
3 months post activation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Device Functionality
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
assessed by: Weekly measurements of fluid removal volume (ml)
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Clinical assessment of fluid overload
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
A composite score evaluating fluid overload, incorporating physical examination findings (e.g., presence of edema, jugular venous distension) and patient-reported symptoms.
Each clinical sign will be assessed individually and aggregated into a composite score to quantify the degree of fluid overload, allowing assessment of the intervention's effectiveness in managing fluid balance over time
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Effectiveness of the drainage fluid
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
assessed by comparing the sodium concentration in the drained fluid to the sodium concentration in the 24-hour urine collection and multiplying this ratio by the volume of the drained fluid
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Echocardiographic assessment
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
Evaluation of cardiac structure and function through echocardiographic imaging, with measurements including ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and wall motion.
These assessments will be aggregated to provide a comprehensive echocardiographic profile as a single outcome, focusing on overall cardiac function and structural changes over time
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Quality of life questionnaire (KCCQ-12 questionnaire)
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item self-administered questionnaire developed to independently measure the patient's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their heart failure impacts their quality of life (QOL) within a 2-week recall period. KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent. |
3 months post activation
|
|
6 minutes' walk test
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance.
The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Number of HF congestion related hospital admissions
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
Tracking the frequency of hospital admissions specifically related to heart failure (HF) congestion, as an indicator of the device's impact on patient symptoms and management of HF-related complications
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Dyspnoea Score
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
assessed by using the Modified Borg Dyspnoea scale at rest - before and during 6 minutes walk test.
This is a scale that asks the patient to rate the difficulty of his breathing.
It starts at number 0 where breathing is causing no difficulty at all and progresses through to number 10 where breathing difficulty is maximal.
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Markers of heart failure Severity:
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
Measurement of specific biomarkers associated with heart failure severity, including NT-proBNP, Antigen carbohydrate 125, Cystatin C, and Interleukin-6, to assess the physiological impact of the intervention on HF progression and patient health status
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Levels of Serum Creatinine
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
Measurement of serum creatinine levels to evaluate kidney function and monitor potential changes associated with the intervention, providing insight into renal health in heart failure patients
|
3 months post activation
|
|
Electrolytes levels
Time Frame: 3 months post activation
|
Assessment of serum electrolyte levels (e.g., sodium, potassium), reported as a combined outcome with consistent units (e.g., mEq/L) to evaluate changes in electrolyte balance, which can reflect kidney function and fluid status in heart failure patients
|
3 months post activation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marko Banović, MD, University Clinical Centre of Serbia
- Principal Investigator: Marija Zdravkovic, MD, University Clinical Hospital Medical Center "Bezanijska kosa"
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PM10002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Automated Continual Fluid Removal System
-
Paragate Medical LTDTerminatedHeart FailureIsrael, Georgia, Poland
-
Sequana Medical N.V.CompletedRefractory or Recurrent AscitesSpain, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Austria
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustUniversité de MontréalNot yet recruitingAcute Renal Failure on Dialysis (Disorder)
-
Twin Star Medical, Inc.United States Department of DefenseUnknownCompartment SyndromeUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruiting
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustMedical Research Council; British Heart FoundationCompleted
-
NovaShunt AGCompletedAscitesGermany, Belgium, Bulgaria, Spain
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayCompletedPeriodontitis | Periodontitis Chronic Generalized SevereNorway
-
Datascope Patient MonitoringCompletedCardiac EventUnited States
-
The University of Texas at DallasTerminatedStroke | Peripheral Neuropathy | Chronic Brain InjuryUnited States