The Diagnostic Efficacy and Lesion Detection Advantages of 18F-FDG PET/CT and Enhanced MRI in Hepatic Malignancies

November 19, 2024 updated by: Shanghai East Hospital

Liver disease is a major challenge for global public health, covering a wide range from mild liver dysfunction to serious diseases such as cirrhosis and liver cancer. Globally, the high incidence rate and mortality of liver diseases have led to a huge socio-economic burden, especially in developing countries. Primary liver cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In addition, the liver is a common site of metastasis for various cancers, and the occurrence of liver metastasis significantly affects the prognosis and treatment strategies of patients. In this context, accurately diagnosing the nature of liver lesions has become the key to improving patient treatment outcomes. Distinguishing between benign and malignant liver lesions is crucial for avoiding unnecessary invasive interventions and ensuring timely and appropriate treatment. Similarly, timely identification of liver metastases is crucial for the overall management and improvement of survival rates in cancer patients.

Traditional imaging techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been widely used for the detection and characterization of liver lesions, but they have limitations in diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, limited recognition of specific pathological features, and insufficient ability to detect small metastases. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), as a widely used fusion imaging technique, combines the metabolic information of PET with the anatomical information of CT, demonstrating unique value in the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of various tumors. However, PET/CT has specific limitations in its application in liver diseases, especially in analyzing small liver lesions and distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors in the context of cirrhosis, which may be challenging. In addition, the radiation exposure caused by CT components is a significant issue that cannot be ignored in PET/CT examinations.

Relatively speaking, PET/MR combined with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)provides a new diagnostic possibility, especially when used in conjunction with abdominal-enhanced MR on the same machine, which is expected to further improve diagnostic accuracy. However, despite the theoretical superiority of this technology over traditional methods, the actual degree of improvement, scope of application, and impact on clinical decision-making are still unclear. Therefore, despite high expectations for this technology, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive study to evaluate the specific benefits of 18F-FDG PET/MR combined with abdominal-enhanced MR in the diagnosis of liver lesions, the particular degree of improvement in diagnostic accuracy, and its potential contribution to improving patient treatment outcomes. This not only helps to validate the practical application value of this technology in the diagnosis of liver lesions but also provides evidence for clinical doctors to optimize and personalize patient diagnosis and treatment plans. The results of this study will provide the scientific basis for future clinical practice, ensuring the effective and cost-effective application of this technology in the management of liver diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective research design, enrolling 60 patients with suspected liver masses over a one-year period, who will undergo 18F-FDG PET/CT and enhanced MRI examinations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with hepatocellular cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old; Preliminary findings from other routine imaging examinations;
  2. Patients suspected of having liver metastasis or liver lesions, based on clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (such as alpha-fetoprotein levels);
  3. Preliminary findings from other routine imaging examinations;
  4. Able to perform 18F-FDG PET/MR examination and agree to follow the research procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a history of allergy to MR contrast agents;
  2. Pregnant or lactating women;
  3. Patients with severe heart disease, renal failure, liver failure, etc;
  4. Patients who are unable to cooperate in completing PET/MR examinations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
research group
This study adopts a prospective research design, with 60 patients suspected of having liver mass undergoing 18F-FDG PET/enhanced MR examination over one year. The inclusion criteria are as follows: age ≥ 18 years old; Patients suspected of having liver metastasis or liver lesions, based on clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (such as alpha-fetoprotein level); Preliminary findings from other routine imaging examinations; Able to perform 18F-FDG PET/MR examination and agree to follow the research procedure. The exclusion criteria are as follows: patients with a history of allergy to MR contrast agents; Pregnant or lactating women; Patients with severe heart disease, renal failure, liver failure, etc; Patients who are unable to cooperate in completing PET/MR examinations. This study passed the ethical review of Shanghai Oriental Hospital, and patients signed informed consent forms after enrollment.
The enrolled patients will undergo PET examination, and the radiation dose generated during the examination will not cause physiological damage to the patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radioactive uptake
Time Frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
Assess the glucose uptake of the lesions.
After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
manifestations of lesions on MR
Time Frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
Two physicians will collaboratively document the dimensions of liver lesions.
After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
manifestations of lesions on MR
Time Frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
Two physicians will collaboratively assess the quantity of lesions.
After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
Signal characteristics on MRI
Time Frame: After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.
Evaluating the MR features of liver lesions, including T1 weighted, T2 weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics, and enhanced features.
After the patient signs the informed consent form and completes the scan, an average of 2 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

In order to better protect patient privacy, the trial data will not be made public. Researchers can contact us via email to obtain the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatoma

Clinical Trials on PET scan of FDG

Subscribe