Psychological Treatment in Psychiatric Inpatient Care.

November 20, 2024 updated by: Lena Reuterskiold, Region Stockholm

Psychological Treatment Based on Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivered by Mental Health Care Staff in Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Care.

There is a lack of psychological treatments within inpatient psychiatric care while there is support for active psychological interventions having an effect on psychiatric problems. The purpose of the present feasibility study is to test whether a psychological treatment based on Cognitive Behavioral therapy (CBT) and Acceptande and Commitment therapy (ACT) for patients in psychiatric inpatient care is acceptable, understandable, helpful and effective both for patients and the staff who carry out the treatment. The therapist in the project will receive training and on-going supervision in a CBT-manual created within the research group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  1. Is cognitive behavioral therapy perceived as acceptable, comprehensible and helpful for patients in psychiatric inpatient ´care, when given by nursing staff in inpatient care?
  2. Is cognitive behavioral therapy perceived as acceptable, understandable and helpful to the nursing staff who provided the treatment intervention?
  3. Is cognitive behavioral therapy effective in reducing psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and perceived health status for patients in psychiatric inpatient care when provided by nursing staff?

Participants are nursing staff from eight psychiatric inpatient wards and patients. The training consists of a two day workshop in the CBT manual followed by eight group supervision sessions parallell with patient treatment.

The patients are offered a CBT manual based psychological intervention with planned four treatment sessions but these can be flexibly prolonged to more sessions for repetition for patients staying for a longer period of time.

The study is a quasi-experimental design. Randomization takes place at ward level. The wards will be twin-matched based on patient problems and then randomized to treatment as usual (control group) or treatment as usual plus a CBT intervention (experimental group). Eight wards are included. Four wards will thus act as a control group and four wards as an experimental group. All within inpatient-care at Region Stockholm. The study aimed to include a total of 230 participants during 2020-2023. With a distribution ratio of 1:2, 77 participants are allocated to the experimental group and 153 participants to the control group, calculated on the basis of an expected effect size of 0.35 and a power of 0.8.

Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria are informed about the study orally and in writing and are offered participation. Informed consent is collected upon offer of participation in the study. Patients are included consecutively as long as the ward and therapists have the available resources to accept more participants. Patients fill in self-report forms in connection with the usual enrollment and discharge routine. The self-report forms are questions about anxiety symptoms (GAD-7); perception of health (EQ-5D); depression symptoms (PHQ-9): experience of the intervention; Behavioral Activation Depression Scale-Short Form (BADS-SF); patient satisfaction. For the qualitative part with in-depth interviews, approx. 20 nursing staff are recruited. Semi-structured interview guide for nursing staff is created.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Psykiatri Nordväst

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Meet criteria for and are enrolled in psychiatric inpatient care.
  • Agree to participate in the study.
  • Assessed to be stable enough to participate in a conversation after a routine ward medical assessment (do they understand what they are agreeing to/not to, can communicate, etc.)

Exclusion criteria:

* Other ongoing intensive psychotherapy (e.g. in outpatient care that continues during the psychiatric inpatient care stay).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Treament as usual
The in-ward patient are provided treatment as usual. This can include medication, routine brief conversation and ward activity.
This treatment as usual can consist of medication, brief talks, leisure activity on the wards.
Experimental: Psychological manualized treatment with CBT and ACT
The intervention is based on a manual and is an add-on to treatment as usual. In-ward patients are offered a brief psychological treatment based on core features from CBT and ACT such as behavioral activation and work on values and unhelpful thoughts. Prior to the intervention nursing staff receive training in the manual followed by supervision during the treatment intervention. The treatment in this condition is an add-on to usual treatment given in the wards. The intervention is brief up to four sessions in the manual but can be shortened or extended to fit the patients admission time.
The intervention is brief and centered around four therapeutic sessions that can be extended or shortened depending on how long patients are hospitalized. Core techniques from CBT and ACT are included in the manual and consists of behavioral activation and values and unhelpful thoughts. Nursing staff on these wards have received training in the manual parallel with supervision which is not given in the treatment as usual wards. The wards that have not received the intervention will be offered this at the end of their TAU period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Activation Depression Scale-Short Form (BADS-SF)
Time Frame: Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
A self-report with nine questions that measures current activity level and satisfaction linked to activity under the present week inclusive of today. Scale scores are from 0 to 6 with a maximum of 54. Higher scores indicate a greater level of activity and satisfaction.
Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
A self-report containing seven questions that measures various aspects of subjective worry, anxiety and stress over the course of the past two weeks. Minimum value is 0 and maximum value 3. Higher scores indicate more anxiety and worry.
Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
Experience of Health (EQ-5D) (EuroQol, https://euroquol.org)
Time Frame: Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
The EQ-5D is a self-report that consists of five dimensions: mobility, self care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D also contains a visual analogue scale where patients can rate their overall health. Higher scores indicate better overall health and well being.
Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
The PHQ-9 is a self-report with nine questions if patients have experienced depression, hopelessness or futility during the last two weeks. A minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 3. Higher scores indicate more depression symtoms.
Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
Patient Satisfaction (https://patientenkat.se/sv/)
Time Frame: Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
A self-report used for all patients in psychiatric in-patient care nationally at discharge. The self-report contains five questions. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with the in-patient care.
Change from pre intervention to post intervention at treatment end, up to four weeks.
Experience of the psychological treatment
Time Frame: Post treatment, an average of two weeks.
A self-report questionnaire created within the research group for this intervention. The self-report consists of seven questions that measures the patients experience of the intervention. The scores range from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate a greater experience and satisfaction.
Post treatment, an average of two weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lena Reuterskiöld PhD, Region Stockholm

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-01169

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD for this data set can not be made available on the individual participant level due to consent given by participants during project time since 2020. Although data on group level including measures of variance and details of statistical analysis plan will be shared to researchers on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety and Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as usual

Subscribe