Assessment of Dimensional Bony Changes Following Laser Corticotomy (Laser)

November 22, 2024 updated by: Ain Shams University

Assessment of Dimensional Bony Changes Following Laser Corticotomy in Rapid Canine Retraction

The patient's bone morphology during orthodontic treatment is an important consideration. Therefore, during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), an imbalance between bone resorption and deposition will cause the tooth to move out of the alveolar envelope . Unfavorable consequences like gingival recession and the dehiscence of an alveolar bone plate may arise from the movement of the teeth beyond the boundary of the bone they are housing. This happened because the dense cortical bone didn't enlarge to maintain protection for the moving root.

On the other hand, orthodontic force creates a complex loading pattern and biological response on the periodontal ligament (PDL). there was an increase in osteoclastic activity in a compression region within the PDL. In contrast, in the other tension region, there was an increase in osteoblastic activity and mineralization of the bone matrix.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Orthodontic tooth movement generates complex mechanical loading patterns with corresponding complex biological responses in the periodontal tissues. This will occur only if the hard tissue around the tooth can undergo proper breakdown and build-up . The primary trigger factor responsible for orthodontic tooth movement is the strain experienced by the periodontal ligament (PDL) cells and the extracellular matrix. This strain results in alteration in the gene expression within the cells, with a production of various cytokines and chemokines, capillary vasodilatation within periodontal ligament, and migration of inflammatory cells with more cytokine production and subsequent alveolar bone remodeling in response to mechanical loading .

On application of orthodontic force, the compression region within the PDL shows increased osteoclastic activity,whereas in the tension region, there is proliferation of osteoblasts and mineralization of the extracellular matrix . In general, molecules that have been linked to tensile strains and act by stimulating osteoblast progenitor cell proliferation in the periodontal ligament, with subsequent bone formation and inhibition of bone resorption similar to orthodontic tooth movement, include transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b), various bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) . On the other hand, Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), CC chemokines ligand 2 (CCL2), and other inflammatory cytokines regulate osteoclastic activity through the activation of the nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) and the nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) .

Corticotomy for rapid tooth movement was introduced in 1959 by Köle to cut the alveolar bone and move a tooth. He practiced corticotomy and osteotomy on various malocclusion cases. Vertically, the cortical and marrow bone between the teeth were partially removed, and either a subapical horizontal cut with alveolar bone cutting at a distance of one cm. from the apex or only a cortical osteotomy excluding the marrow bone was performed .

Conventional treatment with fixed appliances likely requires an average of 1.5 to 2 years, resulting in a canine retraction rate of 0.5 to 1mm per month. Therefore, other modalities have been used to accelerate OTM such as pulsed electromagnetic field, corticotomy, dento-alveolar distraction, periodontal ligament distraction, and laser therapy Laser-based technology was a dream for oral surgery to find a new tool for bone cutting. Using of pulsed erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) lasers showed effective cutting tool with minimum degree of carbonization. Also, it can effectively accelerate canine retraction with no complications or discomfort for the patients. The Erbium laser affects the cortical bone, leading to RAP without postsurgical complications

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Heliopolis - Cairo
      • Cairo, Heliopolis - Cairo, Egypt, 123456
        • Faculty of Dentistry , Al Azhar Univeristy For Girls

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who need extraction of maxillary first premolar in orthodontic treatment and patients who need canine retraction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medically compromised patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control conventional method
conventional method of canine retraction using brackets
tooth movement us done using wires and brackets
Active Comparator: study laser corticotomy
an accelerated orthodontic movement using Waterlase MDTM Turbo all-tissue laser for corticotomy
stimulation of tooth movement during orthodontics treatment using Waterlase MDTM Turbo all-tissue laser therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of labial bone thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
assessment of labial bone using CBCT
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of root length
Time Frame: 6 months
assessment of root length using CBCT
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zainab H Abdel Rahman, Phd, lecturer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Assessment of bony changes

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Canine Retraction

Clinical Trials on Conventional tooth movement

Subscribe