Effectiveness and Implementation of Mobile Health Platform for Medication Management and E-Labeling (eDrugSafe)

November 25, 2024 updated by: Jung Mi Oh, Seoul National University

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Implementation of Mobile Health Platform for Medication Management and E-Labeling (eDrugSafe): a Cluster Randomized Trial

The goal of this cluster randomized trial is to learn if eDrugSafe, a mobile web platform for drug electronic labeling (e-labeling) and medication management, can improve medication adherence and self-efficacy in adults who take multiple medications. This study will also assess whether eDrugSafe is feasible and acceptable for use in real clinical settings, especially in local pharmacies.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can eDrugSafe improve medication adherence, self-efficacy, and quality of life for adults taking multiple medications and reduce hospitalizations?
  • Is eDrugSafe acceptable and feasible for implementing drug e-labeling and supporting medication management in community settings?

Researchers will compare eDrugSafe to usual care (traditional paper methods) to see if eDrugSafe is effective in supporting adults who take multiple medications, and if it can be feasibly implemented in local pharmacies.

Participants will:

  • Visit a local pharmacy randomly assigned to use eDrugSafe or traditional care methods and decide if they wish to join the study.
  • Use either eDrugSafe to access medication information and manage their medication history, or receive usual care with paper-based methods, for 6 months.
  • Complete surveys at the start of the study, at 3 months, and at 6 months to measure effectiveness and implementation outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jung-Mi Oh, Pharm.D
  • Phone Number: +82 10 4880 5699
  • Email: jmoh@snu.ac.kr

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gwanak-gu
      • Seoul, Gwanak-gu, Korea, Republic of, 08826
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Jung-Mi Oh, Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D)
          • Phone Number: +82 10 4880 5699
          • Email: jmoh@snu.ac.kr
        • Contact:
          • Da Eun Lee, Master, Pharm.D
        • Contact:
          • Jung-Mi Oh, Pharm.D
        • Contact:
          • In-Wha Kim, Master, Ph.D
        • Contact:
          • Ji Sun Chun, Pharm.D
        • Contact:
          • Mari Kim, Pharm.D
        • Contact:
          • Hyo Joo Jeon, Pharm.D
        • Contact:
          • Seungyeon Lee, Pharm.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 18 to 79 years.
  2. Individuals who can speak and understand Korean.
  3. Possession of a personal electronic device capable of accessing mobile applications and web services over wireless internet (bring participants' own device, BYOD).
  4. Patients taking three or more medications with at least one medication prescribed for 28 days or longer.
  5. Individuals who have provided direct consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals using any mobile web platform other than eDrugSafe for medication safety information purposes after enrollment.
  2. Individuals who do not consent to participate in the study or who withdraw their consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group: eDrugSafe
Participants will use the eDrugSafe mobile web platform to manage their medication history and access electronic medicinal product information (ePI). QR codes are provided with each prescription to connect users directly to ePI content.
The eDrugSafe mobile web platform enables management of medication history and provides electronic access to medicinal product information (ePI). QR codes are separately provided for prescription records to facilitate direct access to ePI.
Other Names:
  • eDrugSafe: mobile web platform
No Intervention: Control group: Usual care
Participants will use traditional methods, like paper, for managing and accessing medication information. Use of any digital platforms is not permitted in this group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness: self-efficacy in medication management
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 6 month
  • Assessment: The Korean version of the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS)
  • Units of Measure: Total SEAMS score (range: 16-48)
  • Description: The SEAMS is a 16-item scale that assesses confidence in managing medications. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy and confidence in medication management.
baseline, 3 month, 6 month
Effectiveness: medication adherence
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 6 month
  • Assessment: The Korean version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8)
  • Units of Measure: Total MMAS-8 score (range: 0-8)
  • Description: The MMAS-8 scale consists of 8 items. Each of the first 7 items has 2 possible responses (yes/no), while the 8th item is answered with a 5-point Likert scale. The possible total medication adherence score ranges between 0 and 8, and the higher the score, the better the adherence level. A total score < 6 is considered low adherence, while a total score of ≥ 6 but < 8 indicates moderate adherence, and a score of 8 indicates high adherence.
baseline, 3 month, 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness: Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 month
  • Units of Measure: EQ-5D-5L Index (-1 to 1)
  • Description: Health-related quality of life at the 6-month follow-up will be assessed using the Korean EQ-5D-5L scale, administered electronically. The EQ-5D-5L measures five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on five levels (no problems to extreme problems). Responses are converted to an index value (1: full health to 0: death; below 0: worse than death) using a validated Korean scoring algorithm.
6 month
Effectiveness: Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 month
  • Units of Measure: EQ-5D-5L VAS Score (0 to 100)
  • Description: Health-related quality of life at the 6-month follow-up will be assessed using the Korean EQ-5D-5L scale, administered electronically. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will also measure self-rated health on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), administered concurrently with the EQ-5D-5L.
6 month
Effectiveness: Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 6 month
  • Units of Measure: Number of emergency room visits (count)
  • Description: Higher counts reflect poor health outcomes.
6 month
Effectiveness: Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 6 month
  • Units of Measure: Number of hospitalizations (count)
  • Description: Higher counts reflect poor health outcomes.
6 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation: Feasibility of mobile web platform
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up (intervention group only)
  • Assessment: Semi-structured survey guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks
  • Units of Measure: Descriptive statistics of response frequencies (quantitative data) and qualitative analysis
  • Description: The survey assesses user perspectives across three areas: study background, experience with e-labels and the platform, and potential for adoption. Quantitative data will include descriptive statistics of response frequencies, while qualitative data will be analyzed using word coding to identify themes such as acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and barriers.
6-month follow-up (intervention group only)
Implementation: Usability of mobile web platform
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up (intervention group only)
  • Assessment: Korean System Usability Scale (SUS)
  • Units of Measure: SUS total score (range: 0-100)
  • Description: The SUS is a 10-item tool used to assess the usability of the mobile web platform. Scores range from 0 to 100 and are calculated by adjusting responses and multiplying the total by 2.5. A score above 68 is considered above average for usability.
6-month follow-up (intervention group only)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SNUH IRB 2403_002-015
  • 22183MFDS499 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), Republic of Korea)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The decision not to share individual participant data is based on the potential inclusion of certain personal information in the research data. Furthermore, informed consent was not obtained from participants for the disclosure of their information to third parties or public databases.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobile Health

Subscribe