- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06705491
Trauma-Informed Procedural Pain Intervention: Refinement of an Evidence-Based Protocol (TIPPI-R)
The Trauma-Informed Procedural Pain Intervention (TIPPI-R) has been developed as a standardized way to provide education and teach evidence-based strategies for managing pain and distress that may occur during pediatric cancer treatment. The purpose of this clinical trial study is to test how helpful TIPPI-R is in supporting children and families manage pain and distress during the initial stages of cancer treatment. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does TIPPI-R increase use of helpful pain coping strategies for pediatric cancer patients?
- Does TIPPI-R help lower perceived pain intensity during initial stages of cancer treatment?
- Does TIPPI-R increase patient and family confidence in coping with pain and distress during cancer treatment?
Researchers will compare pain experiences and use of pain coping strategies for families who receive the TIPPI-R intervention and families who receive standard of care to see if TIPPI-R decrease pain and distress during the initial stages of cancer treatment.
Participants will:
- Complete surveys to measure pain and distress within 5 weeks of initial diagnosis (Time 1)
- Either receive the TIPPI-R intervention or standard of care
- Complete surveys to measure pain and distress 4 weeks after initial consent or TIPPI-R intervention delivery (Time 2)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lauren R Hayes, PhD
- Phone Number: 50741 502-588-0800
- Email: lauren.hayes@louisville.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Meghan Marsac, PhD
- Email: meghan.marsac@uky.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kentucky
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
- Recruiting
- Kentucky Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Meghan Marsac, PhD
- Email: meghan.marsac@uky.edu
-
Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40508
- Recruiting
- UK DanceBlue Pediatric Hematology & Oncology
-
Contact:
- Meghan Marsac, PhD
- Email: meghan.marsac@uky.edu
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Recruiting
- Norton Children's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Lauren R Hayes, PhD
- Phone Number: 50741 502-588-0800
- Email: lauren.hayes@louisville.edu
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Recruiting
- Norton Children's Cancer Institute
-
Contact:
- Lauren R Hayes, PhD
- Phone Number: 50741 502-588-0800
- Email: lauren.hayes@louisville.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is receiving treatment at Norton Children's Cancer Institute, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky Children's Hospital or DanceBlue Clinic.
- Patient has been diagnosed with an oncology diagnosis.
- Patient and family are English-speaking.
- Patient is between the ages 0-18.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Families not proficient in English.
- Patient is 19 years or older.
- Patient is not receiving treatment at Norton Children's Cancer Institute, Norton Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky Children's Hospital or DanceBlue Clinic.
- Patient does not have an oncology diagnosis.
- Patient and family have any CPS involvement.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TIPPI-R
|
The TIPPI-R intervention protocol consists of a one session, during which time the interventionist offers psychoeducation related to the following content areas: procedural pain related to oncology treatment, factors that may affect the perception of pain, evidenced-based tools for assessing and monitoring pain, cognitive and behavioral pain management interventions, and resources to facilitate family to advocacy for pain management in a medical setting.
During this session, the interventionist discusses opportunities for families to utilize skills throughout treatment, and addresses family questions as needed.
A follow-up session 4 weeks after the initial intervention session will assess family knowledge and skills and offer a referral for a mental health provider, if further pain management support is needed.
TIPPI-R is designed to be delivered by a psychologist, psychology trainee, or social worker working in the oncology context.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Participants and families in this arm will receive the standard treatment for pain and distress during cancer treatment at each respective institution, which may include psychoeducation and support implementing pain coping skills from mental health providers within the healthcare system.
|
|
|
Experimental: Delayed Intervention Delivery
Participants will be moved into this arm if they are initially randomized into the intervention arm, but they receive the TIPPI-R intervention outside of the window dictated in the protocol.
According to the protocol, consented participants should receive the interventions within 2 weeks of consent.
If they do not, the TIPPI-R intervention will still be delivered and the participant will be moved to this arm of the study.
|
The TIPPI-R intervention protocol consists of a one session, during which time the interventionist offers psychoeducation related to the following content areas: procedural pain related to oncology treatment, factors that may affect the perception of pain, evidenced-based tools for assessing and monitoring pain, cognitive and behavioral pain management interventions, and resources to facilitate family to advocacy for pain management in a medical setting.
During this session, the interventionist discusses opportunities for families to utilize skills throughout treatment, and addresses family questions as needed.
A follow-up session 4 weeks after the initial intervention session will assess family knowledge and skills and offer a referral for a mental health provider, if further pain management support is needed.
TIPPI-R is designed to be delivered by a psychologist, psychology trainee, or social worker working in the oncology context.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Coping Strategies
Time Frame: Pain coping strategies will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Families who receive TIPPI-R will report greater use of adaptive pain coping strategies than families in the standard of care condition.
This is measured by Survey of Pain Management Practices, Pain Coping Questionnaire-Short Form (Parent and Child), and data abstraction from medical charts.
The Survey of Pain Management Practices indicates how often pain management strategies are used over the past 7 days (or since diagnosis).
Frequencies are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always).
Scores are calculated by summing the number of strategies used, with higher scores indicating greater frequency of use of adaptive coping strategies.
The Pain Coping Questionnaire-Short Form (Child and Parent version) is a 16-item measure to assess how children cope with pain.
Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often).
A mean scale score is calculated for each subscale, with higher scores indicating more of the measured construct.
|
Pain coping strategies will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Perceived pain intensity will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Patients and families who receive TIPPI-R will report lower perceived intensity of pain experienced by patient than patients and families in the standard of care condition.
This outcome will be measured by the Child Pain Characteristics Survey.
Children and parent proxy rate worst, least, and average pain over the last 7 days on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), identify the location(s) of the pain, and indicate what they believe to be the source(s) of the pain.
|
Perceived pain intensity will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Pain catastrophizing will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Patients and families who receive TIPPI-R will report lower rates of pain catastrophizing than patients and families in the standard of care condition.
This outcome will be measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Questionnaire-Parent and Child forms.
These forms each include13 items across 3 subscales (rumination, magnification, and helplessness), which assess children's catastrophic thoughts and feelings about their pain.
Raters indicate the extent to which they/their child experience each of the items using a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from not at all to extremely, with a higher score indicating more catastrophic thinking.
|
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed at baseline (Time 1) and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
|
Confidence Managing Pain and Distress
Time Frame: Confidence managing pain and distress will be assessed at baseline and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Patients and families who receive TIPPI-R will report higher confidence facilitating patient coping with pain and distress than families in the treatment as usual condition.
This outcome will be measured by the Confidence in Pain Management measure.
The child/caregiver will rate three questions on a scale from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident).
Higher numerical rating will indicate greater confidence in pain management.
|
Confidence managing pain and distress will be assessed at baseline and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
|
Distress
Time Frame: Distress will be assessed at baseline and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Patients and families who receive TIPPI-R will report lower levels of distress than families in the treatment as usual condition.
This outcome will be measured by the Emory Distress Thermometer.
Caregiver and child (8 years and older) distress will be measured with 1 item, in which caregivers and patients will each indicate the degree of distress they have been experiencing in the past week ranging from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress).
|
Distress will be assessed at baseline and again approximately 4-6 weeks after being consented (Time 2).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lauren R Hayes, PhD, Norton Children's Medical Group, Affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Reid GJ, Gilbert CA, McGrath PJ. The Pain Coping Questionnaire: preliminary validation. Pain. 1998 May;76(1-2):83-96. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00029-3.
- Goubert L, Eccleston C, Vervoort T, Jordan A, Crombez G. Parental catastrophizing about their child's pain. The parent version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P): a preliminary validation. Pain. 2006 Aug;123(3):254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.035. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
- Tutelman PR, Chambers CT, Stinson JN, Parker JA, Fernandez CV, Witteman HO, Nathan PC, Barwick M, Campbell F, Jibb LA, Irwin K. Pain in Children With Cancer: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Parent Management. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):198-206. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000531.
- O'Donnell FT, Rosen KR. Pediatric pain management: a review. Mo Med. 2014 May-Jun;111(3):231-7.
- Tonning Olsson I, Alberts NM, Li C, Ehrhardt MJ, Mulrooney DA, Liu W, Pappo AS, Bishop MW, Anghelescu DL, Srivastava D, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Ness KK, Krull KR, Brinkman TM. Pain and functional outcomes in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study. Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1679-1689. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33303. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
- Schwartz LA, Brumley LD. What a Pain: The Impact of Physical Symptoms and Health Management on Pursuit of Personal Goals Among Adolescents with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Mar;6(1):142-149. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0031. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
- Price J, Kassam-Adams N, Alderfer MA, Christofferson J, Kazak AE. Systematic Review: A Reevaluation and Update of the Integrative (Trajectory) Model of Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):86-97. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv074. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
- Rosenberg AR, Bradford MC, Junkins CC, Taylor M, Zhou C, Sherr N, Kross E, Curtis JR, Yi-Frazier JP. Effect of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management Intervention for Parents of Children With Cancer (PRISM-P): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11578.
- Kearney JA, Salley CG, Muriel AC. Standards of Psychosocial Care for Parents of Children With Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Dec;62 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S632-83. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25761.
- Uhl K, Burns M, Hale A, Coakley R. The Critical Role of Parents in Pediatric Cancer-Related Pain Management: a Review and Call to Action. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Mar 14;22(4):37. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0899-7.
- Marsac ML, Kassam-Adams N, Hildenbrand AK, Nicholls E, Winston FK, Leff SS, Fein J. Implementing a Trauma-Informed Approach in Pediatric Health Care Networks. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jan;170(1):70-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2206.
- Stehl ML, Kazak AE, Alderfer MA, Rodriguez A, Hwang WT, Pai AL, Boeving A, Reilly A. Conducting a randomized clinical trial of an psychological intervention for parents/caregivers of children with cancer shortly after diagnosis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Sep;34(8):803-16. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn130. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
- Kazak AE, Hocking MC, Ittenbach RF, Meadows AT, Hobbie W, DeRosa BW, Leahey A, Kersun L, Reilly A. A revision of the intensity of treatment rating scale: classifying the intensity of pediatric cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jul 15;59(1):96-9. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23320. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
- Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Nguyen C, Nathan PC, Maloney AM, Dupuis LL, Gerstle JT, Hopyan S, Alman BA, Strahlendorf C, Portwine C, Johnston DL. Construct validity and reliability of a real-time multidimensional smartphone app to assess pain in children and adolescents with cancer. Pain. 2015 Dec;156(12):2607-2615. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000385.
- Kohut SA, Stinson J, Chambers CT, Reid GJ, Pillai Riddell RR. The Pain Coping Questionnaire short-form: preliminary reliability and validity. Pain Rep. 2022 Jan 12;7(1):e982. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000982. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
- Caes L, Goubert L, Devos P, Verlooy J, Benoit Y, Vervoort T. The relationship between parental catastrophizing about child pain and distress in response to medical procedures in the context of childhood cancer treatment: a longitudinal analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Aug;39(7):677-86. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24.0284
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Procedural Pain
-
Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain...DepomedCompletedMinor Procedural PainUnited States
-
IRCCS Burlo GarofoloCompletedProcedural Pain ReliefItaly
-
IWK Health CentreCompletedNeonatal Procedural Pain ResponseCanada
-
Istanbul UniversityNot yet recruitingProcedural Pain | Procedural Anxiety | Breast Imaging
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruitingProcedural Pain | Procedural AnxietyQatar
-
Agri Ibrahim Cecen UniversityCompletedProcedural Pain | Procedure-Related Anxiety | Pediatric Wounds | Procedural FearTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of UtahCompleted
-
Hakkari UniversitesiNot yet recruitingPain | Anxiety | Fear | Procedural Pain | Procedural Anxiety
-
Aynur Aytekin OzdemirCompletedProcedural Pain Relief | Fear PainTurkey
-
Hayatabad Medical ComplexNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on TIPPI-R
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Colorado, Denver; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious... and other collaboratorsCompletedRNA Virus Infections | Respiratory Tract Infections | Influenza, Human | Orthomyxoviridae Infections | Respiratory Tract Disease | Virus Disease | Physiological Effects of Drugs | VaccinesUnited States
-
Klinikum NürnbergUnknown
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)CompletedRespiratory Tract Infections | Influenza | VaccinesUnited States
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)China
-
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery...Not yet recruiting
-
LifeScanCompleted
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedHealthy VolunteersFrance
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingDiffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | CD5 PositiveChina