The Effects of High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance Control in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

April 15, 2025 updated by: Dr Arnold Wong Yu Lok, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The Effects of High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance Control in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects and mechanisms of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on chronic low back pain and balance in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Primary hypothesis 1: Active stimulation would have greater improvement in pain and balance, reduced left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation than sham stimulation.

Primary hypothesis 2: Active stimulation would have enhanced functional connectivity than sham stimulation.

Primary hypothesis 3: The balance improvement would be related to reduced pain, decreased left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation, enhanced functional connectivity, attention, and/or executive function.

Participants will be randomly received a single-session of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (active or sham stimulation). Before and immediately after the intervention, balance (semi-tandem stance and timed up-and-go test (TUG)) and cognitive (attention and executive function) tests will be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 999077
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 60-85 years;
  • With non-specific chronic low back pain that has no definitive diagnosis but lasted for at least 3 months, typically occurs in the area between the lower rib margins and the buttock creases;
  • With an average pain intensity over the last week to be ≥ 3 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) anchored with "no pain" at zero and "worst pain imaginable" at 10;
  • Have normal cognitive function (Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment ≥ 22);
  • Who agree to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to ambulate without assistance from another person or tools (e.g., canes or walkers);
  • Having specific causes of low back pain (e.g., spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, recent vertebral fracture, spinal infection);
  • Having other acute or overt musculoskeletal conditions in other parts of the body (e.g., fractures, severe pain, multiple joint pain (e.g., knee pain));
  • History of lumbar or lower extremity surgery;
  • Receiving LBP treatment within the past one month or at present;
  • Have never received non-invasive brain stimulation (e.g., transcranial direct current stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial alternating current stimulation) before.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active stimulation
For the active stimulation, the current will be ramped up from 0 to 2 mA over the initial 30-s period and then maintain the current of 2 mA for 20 minutes, following by a 30-s ramp-down period.
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation is a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique based on the principle that when weak intensity electric currents are targeted on specific areas of the scalp, they cause underlying cortical stimulation. The anode increases cortical excitability, while cathode decreases cortical excitability.
Experimental: Sham stimulation
The participants will receive the same intervention procedures, but the intervention will have no therapeutic effect. Specifically, for the sham stimulation, participants will only experience 30-s ramp-up and 30-s ramp-down periods at both the commencement and end of the stimulation.
High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation is a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique based on the principle that when weak intensity electric currents are targeted on specific areas of the scalp, they cause underlying cortical stimulation. The anode increases cortical excitability, while cathode decreases cortical excitability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current back-pain intensity
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
The current back-pain intensity will be assessed with the 11-point numerical rating scale anchored with "no pain" at zero and "worst pain imaginable" at 10.
Before and immediately after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting-state blood oxygen concentration
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
Resting-state blood oxygen concentration (indicated by Oxyhemoglobin concentration (μmol)) will be measured using the portable fNIRS imaging system (NIRSport 2, NIRx Medical Technologies LLC, Glen Head, NY, USA). We will instruct participants to sit still and comfortably with their eyes open, lean against the back rest, and look at a fixation cross one meter in front of them for 5 minutes.
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Arithmetic performance
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
Participants will be required to perform the cognitive task in the seated postition (3 x 30s). The cognitive task is serial subtraction from a random three-digit number (200-999) by 7s audibly. The number of correct and incorrect answers will be recorded.
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Postural sway
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
Postural sway will be assessed by APDM® Mobility Lab (APDM, Inc., Portland, OR, USA) in the following tests in a random order: (1) semi-tandem stance on firm surfaces without cognitive task (3 x 30s), (2) semi-tandem stance on firm surfaces with cognitive task (3 x 30s), (3) semi-tandem stance on foam surfaces without cognitive task (3 x 30s), (4) semi-tandem stance on foam surfaces with cognitive task (3 x 30s). The cognitive task is serial subtraction from a random three-digit number (200-999) by 7s audibly. No instructions are given regarding task prioritization. During the standing tests, cortical activation will be measured using the NIRSport 2 system with its control box placed in a backpack worn by participants.
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Timed up-and-go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
TUG will be performed in random order in the following tests: (1) TUG without a cognitive task (3 trials) and (2) TUG with a cognitive task (3 trials). The cognitive task involves serial subtraction from a random three-digit number (ranging from 200 to 999) by subtracting 7s audibly. No specific instructions are provided regarding task prioritization. The time (in seconds) taken to complete the TUG, along with the number of correct and incorrect answers, will be recorded for statistical analysis.
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Attention
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
Attention will be assessed using the Trail Making Test - A (TMT-A). TMT-A involves connecting a series of 25 square and circle encircled numbers in ascending order, without lifting the pen from the paper. Errors will be corrected immediately and re-establish the sequence. The time (in seconds) to complete the TMT-A will be recorded for statistical analysis.
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Executive function
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention.
Executive function will be assessed using TMT-A and the Trail Making Test - B (TMT-B). TMT-A involves connecting a series of 25 square and circle encircled numbers in ascending order, without lifting the pen from the paper. In TMT-B, the numbers from 1 to 25 are twice presented in square and circle shapes ("1" is only presented once). Participants are instructed to connect the numbers in ascending order, alternating between the squares and circles. Errors will be corrected immediately and re-establish the sequence. The time to complete the TMT-A and TMT-B will be recorded. Executive function will be indicated by the difference in TMT-A and TMT-B (TMT-B minus TMT-A in seconds).
Before and immediately after the intervention.
Side or adverse effects
Time Frame: During and 1 hour after the intervention.
Any side or adverse effects (e.g., itching, tingling and burning sensations under electrodes) related to the interventions will be monitored in all participants.
During and 1 hour after the intervention.
Blinding efficacy
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
A blinding efficacy questionnaire will be completed after intervention. If the participant believes that they receive active or sham stimulation, they will be asked to state their confidence in this belief on a scale of 1 (not confident) to 3 (very confident).
Immediately after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSEARS20240416001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation

Subscribe