Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Women Living With HIV in Kenya, the ENHANCE LINKAge Trial

May 28, 2026 updated by: Michael H Chung, Emory University

Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Women Living With HIV in Kenya (ENHANCE LINKAGE)

Background In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV create a dual burden of disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality in the form of cervical cancer (CC). Women living with HIV (WLWH) have a six-fold higher risk of developing precancerous lesions that persist and progress to CC, which is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women in Kenya. Significant support from the Go Further campaign, represented by donors such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the George W. Bush Institute, UNAIDS, Merck, and Roche, to integrate CC screening into HIV clinics represents an exceptional opportunity to scale CC impact across SSA, but only if implementation science evidence is available to inform strategy. Currently, the impact of Go Further has been undermined by fractured linkages to care and insensitive screening methods; in Kenya, less than 2% of WLWH screened have received appropriate treatment. Implementation science studies are needed to better understand and surmount barriers to integrated care in publicly funded HIV clinics.

Broad objective This study seeks to explore and innovate strategies to overcome patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers to implementing CC screening and referral guidelines, link WLWH who require further diagnostic testing and/or treatment with effective and accessible care, and document services for accountability and quality improvement. In this proposal, our team will apply our extensive implementation science expertise and partnerships with Kenya Ministry of Health (MOH) to adapt and test evidence-based strategies (e.g., HPV self-testing, care navigators, and the WEMA mHealth app [tested and scaled in Tanzania]) that address key multi-level barriers identified through a formative, stakeholder-engaged research phase.

Methodology Using the EPIS framework to guide our project, we will: Aim 1a), Explore (engage a multi-disciplinary stakeholder advisory board to co-design the intervention package and prioritize implementation strategies that align with local capacity, opportunities, and motivations; Aim 1b), Prepare (develop tools and strengthen capacity at clinics to implement the strategies; Aim 2), Implement and evaluate the package of implementation strategies via a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial in 9 clinics (assessing implementation [provision of CC screening with HPV self-testing] and effectiveness [proportion of HPVpositive WLWH who receive subsequent diagnostic triage and/or treatment] over months 0-12; and Aim 3), assess Sustainability (costs, cost-effectiveness, and transfer of delivery from study to local staff over months 13-18.

Significance of the study The overall goal of this study is to employ rigorous empirical methods to adapt and test implementation strategies that expand the scope of HIV care to screen for and treat early precancerous CC lesions in a sustainable, scalable way. Through partnering with Kenya's MOH, this project will have critical institutional support and dissemination capability, and will directly inform public health practice and policy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Broad Objectives This study seeks to inform the effective and sustainable integration of early detection and successful treatment of precancerous cervical lesions among women living with HIV (WLWH) ages 25-49 years in HIV care clinics for women in Kenya.

Specific Objectives I. Identify and address barriers to integration and uptake of cervical cancer screening and treatment linkage in HIV care settings in Kenya.

II. Evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of ENHANCE LINKage (HPV self-testing, care navigators, and mHealth that supports screening and treatment linkage) in a hybrid type 2 study, a cluster randomized trial in 20 HIV care clinics.

III. Evaluate sustainability and economic impacts of ENHANCE LINKage.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Amandine Zoonekyndt-Ballart
  • Phone Number: 404-727-1210
  • Email: aballa3@emory.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Mohammed K Ali, MD, MSc, MBA
  • Phone Number: 404-727-9776
  • Email: mkali@emory.edu

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute
        • Contact:
          • Nelly Rwamba Mugo
          • Phone Number: 254 20 2720030
          • Email: rwamba@uw.edu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nelly Rwamba Mugo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Aged 25-49 years
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Female
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Willing to participate in a 90-minute audio-recorded focus group discussion (FGD) and
  • AIM 1 (PATIENTS): Speak English or Swahili
  • AIM 1 (NURSES, CLINICAL STAFF, ADMINISTRATORS): Aged 18 years or older
  • AIM 1 (NURSES, CLINICAL STAFF, ADMINISTRATORS): Involved in implementing intervention components
  • AIM 1 (STAKEHOLDERS): Adults (aged >= 18 years) who are healthcare system users, support persons, healthcare providers and administrators, representatives of the government, professional associations, and non-governmental and faith-based organizations
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (CLINIC PROVIDERS): Aged 18 years and older involved in CC screening, triage, and treatment
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (WOMEN LIVING WITH HIV): Ages 25-49 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AIM 1: Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) members who are not engaged in CC work, individuals who have recently retired from the selected clinics, and patients who are attending the clinic for the first time will be excluded from the study
  • AIMS 2 AND 3 (WOMEN LIVING WITH HIV): Pregnant women, women =< 6 weeks postpartum, and women already confirmed to have cervical cancer will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aim 2, Arm I (ENHANCE LINKAge)
Patients receive HPV self-testing kit and instruction on how to perform HPV self-testing on study. Patients undergo vaginal self-swab and receive results by text message. Patients also receive mobile text message reminders for triage or treatment for women that test positive with HPV.
Receive instructions on how to use HPV self-testing kit
Undergo HPV self-collection
Other Names:
  • At-home HPV Self Collection
  • HPV Self Collection
  • Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection
Receive text messages for HPV testing results and triage and treatment reminders
Other Names:
  • Automated Text Message-Based Navigation
  • Text Message-Based Navigation
Active Comparator: Aim 2 (standard care)
Patients undergo standard of care at clinics that have VIA testing
Receive standard care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOME: Difference in proportions in cervical cancer (CC) screening uptake between the intervention implementation versus control clinics
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
Modified mixed effects Poisson models will be used to estimate prevalence ratios, including the effect of clinic-level intervention (no intervention versus intervention) with fixed effects for intervention exposure status, and a random effect for clinic. Imbalanced baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across clinics will be included as independent variables in an adjusted model. Statistical differences between intervention versus control clinics during each observation period in terms of indicators will be tested using X^2 tests while mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be tested using t-tests.
1 to 12 months
EFFECTIVENESS OUTCOME: Difference in the proportion of patients that received follow-up triage (with VIA) or treatment in the implementation intervention versus control clinics
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
Modified mixed effects Poisson models will be used to estimate prevalence ratios, including the effect of clinic-level intervention (no intervention versus intervention) with fixed effects for intervention exposure status, and a random effect for clinic. Imbalanced baseline demographic and clinical characteristics across clinics will be included as independent variables in an adjusted model. Statistical differences between intervention versus control clinics during each observation period in terms of indicators will be tested using X^2 tests while mean differences and 95% CI will be tested using t-tests.
1 to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Communication of human papillomavirus (HPV) test result to patients via mobile (m)Health messages
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
Based on confirmation of HPV test results being sent to the participant's phone via two-way text message or mHealth application.
1 to 12 months
Receipt of HPV-negative result and guidance for next CC screening
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
Based on participants responding with a text to indicate that they have received their HPV results.
1 to 12 months
Retention in HIV Care (>=2 visits per year)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
Between-arm comparison
1 to 12 months
HIV viral suppression (undetectable)
Time Frame: 1 to 12 months
between-arm comparison
1 to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Chung, MD, PhD, Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Depends on regulations in Kenya regarding IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infection

Clinical Trials on Best Practice

Subscribe