Regime for Vitamin D Maintenance in Post-Operative Patients (D-ECISIVE)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Koh Hong Xiang Frederick, Sengkang General Hospital

Regime for Vitamin D Maintenance in Post-Operative Patients (D-ECISIVE) Randomized Controlled Trial

Vitamin D plays a significant part calcium and phosphate haemostasis, thus, intrinsically critical for bone health. Increasing evidence also reveal that insufficient serum vitamin D levels also result in poor muscle health with such individuals having a compromised muscle building potential (4 times slower muscle building).

Muscle health is a critical component of a post-surgical patient recovery, with impaired muscle function leading to reduced functional ability, resulting in a poorer quality of life. Poor muscle health also has negative repercussion on survivability, with reduced overall, and disease-specific survival, especially shown in cancer patients. Thus, maintenance of vitamin D levels post-surgery may be more critical than previously thought.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is performed in Singapore (outside the US) and the medication, while it is a FDA approved medication, is not manufactured in the US for the trial purpose and the indications of use in this trial is not new.

The investigators would be recruiting patients aged 21-65 years who have undergone major surgery (defined by the NICE criteria) and who are able to provide informed consent, accept to take vitamin D supplements post-operatively and have their serum vitamin D levels checked periodically.

The investigators will excluded patients who have undergone minor procedures (Table code <4a), those who have a history of chronic kidney disease/end staged renal failure, known hyperparathyroidism, are non-ambulatory independently and have had known allergies to the commercially available high dose vitamin D formulations.

High dose oral vitamin D supplementation (50,000 IU/week for 8 weeks) is the current recommended dose for individuals with vitamin D insufficiency of deficiency and is currently being used for some prehabilitation programmes due to the quick repletion of vitamin D levels to improve muscle gain during the short prehabilitation window prior to surgery.

Using the same dose once a month would provide a significantly less vitamin D supplementation, especially with individuals who have had their vitamin D levels repleted in the preoperative phase. This will be compared against a control who are randomised to standard-of-care (SOC) where high dose vitamin D maintenance is not prescribed.

The unmet clinical need is the still unknown, unstandardised vitamin D supplementation regime. There are current no clinical consensus on vitamin D supplementation after patients who have undergone major surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between 30-50ng/ml at 4-6 weeks after operation
  • aged 21-65 years
  • ability to provide informed consent
  • accepts to take vitamin D supplements post-operatively and
  • have their serum vitamin D levels checked periodically.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They have undergone minor procedures (Table code <4a)
  • have a history of chronic kidney disease/end staged renal failure
  • have previous history of ureteric/kidney stones
  • known hyperparathyroidism
  • are non-ambulatory independently
  • have had known allergies to the commercially available high dose vitamin D formulations.
  • Vulnerable personnel would be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitamin D supplementation
High dose oral vitamin D supplementation (50,000 IU/once a month)
High dose oral vitamin D supplementation (50,000 IU/once per month)
Other Names:
  • D-cure
No Intervention: Standard-of-care Arm
standard of care arm where vitamin D levels are not actively acted upon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at 3-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 3 months after initiation
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels at 3-months post-intervention
3 months after initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels compared to SOC at 6-months post-intervention.
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels compared to SOC at 6-months post-intervention.
6 months after initiation
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels compared to SOC at 12-months post-intervention.
Time Frame: 12 months after initiation
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels compared to SOC at 12-months post-intervention.
12 months after initiation
functional outcome measures at 3-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 3-months after intiation
functional outcome measures at 3-months post-intervention
3-months after intiation
functional outcome measures at 6-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation
functional outcome measures at 6-months post-intervention
6 months after initiation
functional outcome measures at 12-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 12 months after initiation
functional outcome measures at 12-months post-intervention
12 months after initiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 3-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 3 months after intiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 3-months post-intervention
3 months after intiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 6-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 6-months post-intervention
6 months after initiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 12-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 12 months after initiation
muscle quality (Ultrasound+MuscleSound™ evaluation) at 12-months post-intervention
12 months after initiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 3-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 3 months after intiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 3-months post-intervention
3 months after intiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 6-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 months after initiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 6-months post-intervention
6 months after initiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 12-months post-intervention
Time Frame: 12 months after initiation
quality of life (EQ5D-3L) at 12-months post-intervention
12 months after initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederick H Koh, FRCS, PhD, Sengkang General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

only centrally available to the PI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D

Subscribe