Comparing Exercise Programs for Managing Knee Osteoarthritis

November 29, 2024 updated by: Mustafa Alabdallah Alalewy, Uludag University

Investigating The Most Effective Exercise Modality in Knee Osteoarthritis; A RCT

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the effectiveness of three different exercise modalities-whole-body vibration exercise, progressive resistance exercise, and home-based exercise -in improving quadriceps isometric muscle strength, physical function, balance, knee pain, osteoarthritis symptoms, and overall quality of life in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How do WBV, PRE, and home-based exercise compare in improving quadriceps strength in people with knee osteoarthritis?
  • Which exercise modality leads to the greatest improvements in physical function, balance, knee pain, and quality of life?

Researchers will compare the three exercise regimens to determine which is most effective for improving knee function and relieving osteoarthritis symptoms.

Participants will:

  • Engage in whole-body vibration exercise, progressive resistance exercise, or home-based exercise for 3 weeks.
  • Undergo assessments before and at the end of the exercise program, including tests for physical function and balance (Timed Up and Go Test, 5x Sit to Stand Test) and questionnaires to evaluate knee osteoarthritis symptoms (WOMAC), quality of life (SF-36), and self-reported knee pain (Numeric Rating Scale).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nilüfer
      • Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey, 16059
        • Uludağ University Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. participants between the ages of 45-70,
  2. diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to ACR criteria (unilateral or bilateral),
  3. having grade 2 or 3 tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence staging,
  4. having knee pain due to OA for a minimum of 3 months prior to enrollment,
  5. patients whose medical treatment is not expected to change during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. having or had undergone knee surgery,
  2. patients unable to walk without support,
  3. having musculoskeletal limitations that prevent participation in resistance exercises (contracture, fracture, etc.),
  4. other neurological, cardiac, respiratory and systemic diseases that will affect physical activity,
  5. currently implementing a regular exercise or physical therapy program specific to knee OA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Whole-body Vibration (WBV) Training Group
Participants undergo WBV training as outlined in the WBV intervention, 3 days per week for 3 weeks. The sessions begin with a duration of 10 minutes in the first week, with the duration increasing each week thereafter. They also perform the home exercises assigned to the Control group on the same days as their PRE sessions.

Participants use the "Compex Winplate," designed specifically for vibration training. The device is set with a frequency of 30 Hz and an amplitude of 4 mm. Participants perform a total of 5 exercises consisting of static and dynamic squat exercises, with a 30-second rest period between sets and between different exercises. The exercises and progression over the weeks are as follows:

Week 1:

  • Static squat with knees flexed at 30° - 2 sets of 30 seconds each
  • Dynamic squat with knees flexed between 0-60° - 2 sets of 30 seconds each
  • Fingertip-to-sole partial dynamic squat with knees flexed at 30° - 2 sets of 30 seconds each
  • Consecutive weight transfer with knees flexed at 45° - 2 sets of 30 seconds each
  • Single leg static squat with knees flexed at 30° - 30 seconds per leg

Subsequent Weeks: The duration of each set increases by 10 seconds each week. Each training session includes a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cooldown, consisting of joint motion and muscle stretching exercises.

Other Names:
  • WBV
Active Comparator: Progressive Resistance Exercise (PRE) Group
Participants undergo PRE training as outlined in the PRE intervention, 3 days per week for 3 weeks. The training focuses on strengthening the quadriceps muscles using ankle weights. The load is determined using the DeLorme principle at the start of each week. They also perform the home exercises assigned to the Control group on the same days as their PRE sessions.

Training Duration: Participants undergo approximately 15-20 minute training sessions, 3 days per week for 3 weeks.

Exercise Regimen: The training focuses on strengthening the quadriceps muscles using ankle weights. The load is determined using the DeLorme principle:

  • At the beginning of each week, the 10-repetition maximum (10RM) is measured.
  • During that week, participants perform their training sets as follows:

    • First set: 50% of 10RM
    • Second set: 75% of 10RM
    • Final set: 100% of 10RM Each training session includes a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cooldown, consisting of joint motion and muscle stretching exercises.
Other Names:
  • PRE
Active Comparator: Control Group (Home-Based Exercise)
Participants perform home exercises three days per week for 3 weeks. The exercises consist of range of motion (ROM) and isometric strengthening exercises as detailed in the intervention section.

Protocol: Participants receive a printed document with instructions for home exercises and are instructed on how to perform the exercises.

Training Duration: Sessions are conducted three days per week for 3 weeks.

Exercise Regimen: The exercises include:

  • Bilateral Quadriceps Isometric Exercise: Participants lie on their backs with a roll below each knee, pressing for 10-second holds, totaling 20 repetitions.
  • Knee Extensions: Participants performed knee extensions while seated, holding each extension for 5 seconds, completing 10 repetitions per leg.
  • Knee Range of Motion (ROM) Exercises: Participants lie face down and alternately bend their knees, completing 10 repetitions.

Each training session includes a 5-minute warm-up and a 5-minute cooldown, consisting of joint motion and muscle stretching exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quadriceps Isometric Muscle Strength
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
Quadriceps isometric muscle strength is measured using an Isokinetic dynamometer (CSMI Humac Norm, Stoughton, MA). Measurements are taken in a sitting position with the knee positioned at two angles: 30° and 60° of flexion. For each angle, one trial is performed followed by three real measurements, with the highest peak torque recorded in Newton-meters (Nm). Participants are secured to the dynamometer, and all settings and positions are standardized. Prior to measurements, the device is calibrated, and participants perform a 5-minute warm-up and familiarize themselves with the test procedure. Verbal encouragement is provided during the tests.
at baseline and 3-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test (Physical Function and Balance)
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
The TUG test assesses lower-extremity function performance, dynamic balance, and fall risk. Participants stand up from a standard chair (43 cm height), walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Timing is performed using a chronograph, and one practice trial is conducted before the actual test. The entire walking test is timed in seconds.
at baseline and 3-weeks
Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSST) (Physical Function and Balance)
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSST): The 5xSST evaluates functional lower limb strength, transitional movements, balance, and fall risk. Participants sit on a chair with their back supported, fold their arms across their chest, and then sit and stand five times as quickly as possible without resting their back or legs on the chair. Timing is performed using a chronograph.
at baseline and 3-weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Self-reported Knee Pain)
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
Self-reported knee pain is assessed using a 10-cm numeric scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents maximal pain. Participants rate their most severe pain level experienced over the past week, both at rest and during activity.
at baseline and 3-weeks
WOMAC (Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms and Function)
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) evaluates symptoms and functional status through 24 questions, rated from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The index includes five questions on knee pain severity, two questions on stiffness, and 17 questions on physical function limitations.
at baseline and 3-weeks
SF-36 (Quality of Life)
Time Frame: at baseline and 3-weeks
The Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) assesses health-related quality of life through 36 items rated on Likert scales. Various sub-scores reflect different aspects of health-related quality of life, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
at baseline and 3-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be made available due to privacy concerns and the fact that the data collected are not intended for sharing outside of the scope of the study's analysis. Additionally, there are no plans for secondary research involving the data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Whole-body Vibration (WBV) Training

Subscribe