Ultrasound Detection of Body Composition in Critical Care

February 8, 2026 updated by: Ain Shams University

Detection of the Changes in Body Composition of Critically Ill Obstetrics by Ultrasound and the Co-relations With Clinical Outcomes; a Prospective Observational Study.

Objective assessment of the Changes in body composition of critically ill patients is very valuable. Ultrasound stands as a solution due to its portability, bedside availability, and radiation-free technology. Those criteria are crucial for critically ill obstetrics and gynecological cases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with acute/critical illness are particularly vulnerable to muscle loss and fluid shifts, which adversely impact clinical outcomes. Assessment of these parameters in hospital settings is often subjective and imprecise, which creates discrepancies in identification and difficulty in follow-up.

The decrease in muscle mass and/or change in the composition, and fluid overload adversely impact the clinical outcome in critically ill patients and their recovery. There is growing interest in body composition (BC) assessment techniques that can be applied in ICU settings. whole-body BC estimates, and select BC variables show promise as biomarkers of muscle health, nutrition risk, and fluid status. Studies reported that Quadriceps muscle thickness predicted increased morbidity/mortality in ICU patients and has been suggested to be an objective biomarker to determine fitness for aggressive treatment. US measures of muscle loss in the critically ill will aid in the development of appropriate intervention strategies. Alternatively, qualitative muscle evaluation through the measure of echogenicity (using image gray-scale visual analysis) is a sensitive indicator of muscle atrophy. The ultrasound can contribute to assessing necrosis, fatty infiltration, and inflammation in place of invasive muscle biopsy in critically ill patients. Ultrasound offers an important tool for early non-volitional assessment of muscle function in the critically ill.

US characterization of muscle changes would facilitate the development and monitoring of muscle-targeted nutrition and physical therapy interventions. Knowing body muscle and adipose tissue mass is essential in several clinical situations to adapt drug dose to the volume of distribution and to guide nutrition as well as physical therapy. US imaging is a practical method for the prospective assessment of SM (skeletal muscle) changes in response to illness and treatment. Previous ICU studies have focused on measurements of muscle quantity (muscle thickness and CSA) in both the quadriceps, a muscle region known to be rapidly impacted by sarcopenia, and to correlate with ICU survival. Ultrasound has been used primarily as a tool for body composition measurement in clinical nutrition. Although many recent reports have demonstrated that ultrasound could be a useful tool for nutritional assessment and body composition assessment, it is not well incorporated into ICU practice regarding nutritional assessment and follow-up This trial is the first to investigate the role of ultrasound in detecting body composition in critically ill obstetrics and gynecological cases and its correlation with clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

121

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 11528

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill women whether pregnant, peripartum, postoperative, or admitted for any critical illness.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • females with age 16 with no upper limit
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I, II or III,
  • admitted to the obstetrics and Gynecology critical care unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
critically ill obstetrics patients , admitted to ICU

Muscle mass and fat thickness The examiner will use a five-site protocol. The protocol includes the examination of quadriceps on four sides and one bicep will be used The technique is reported by USVALID (Arabella, 2020) GRADING OF QUALITY OF ULTRASOUND SCANS - Muscle quality (fat and fibrotic infiltration) grading for each scan

  1. = Muscle fascia and bone surface visible
  2. = muscle fascia and bone surface still possible to spot
  3. = muscle fascia and bone surface not distinguishable; no evaluation possible

The FLUID protocol for edema will be done as follows: MEASURING POINTS 36 points, GRADING OF QUALITY: The examiner will use a 5-point scale of ultrasonic subcutaneous edema grade (USEG) to evaluate subcutaneous edema at each site based on echo intensity, tissue transparency, and fluid properties.

Day zero, day 2 then Every 2 days if extended length.

critically ill gynecological cases, admitted to ICU

Muscle mass and fat thickness The examiner will use a five-site protocol. The protocol includes the examination of quadriceps on four sides and one bicep will be used The technique is reported by USVALID (Arabella, 2020) GRADING OF QUALITY OF ULTRASOUND SCANS - Muscle quality (fat and fibrotic infiltration) grading for each scan

  1. = Muscle fascia and bone surface visible
  2. = muscle fascia and bone surface still possible to spot
  3. = muscle fascia and bone surface not distinguishable; no evaluation possible

The FLUID protocol for edema will be done as follows: MEASURING POINTS 36 points, GRADING OF QUALITY: The examiner will use a 5-point scale of ultrasonic subcutaneous edema grade (USEG) to evaluate subcutaneous edema at each site based on echo intensity, tissue transparency, and fluid properties.

Day zero, day 2 then Every 2 days if extended length.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in body composition-muscular element
Time Frame: on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first, assessed up to 20 days from admission

Decreased muscle thickness measured by mm or change in quality by visual frey-white detection by ultrasound. The grading for each scan

  1. = Muscle fascia and bone surface visible
  2. = muscle fascia and bone surface still possible to spot
  3. = muscle fascia and bone surface not distinguishable; no evaluation possible
on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first, assessed up to 20 days from admission
change in body composition-fat element
Time Frame: on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first, assessed up to 20 days from admission.
change in thickness of subcutaneous fat measured in mm.
on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first, assessed up to 20 days from admission.
change in body composition-extreacellular oedema element
Time Frame: on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first .

The examiner will use a 5-point scale of ultrasonic subcutaneous edema grade (USEG) to evaluate subcutaneous edema at each site based on echo intensity, tissue transparency, and fluid properties.

the total Degree of edema measurement is: The final ultrasonic subcutaneous edema score (USES) will be calculated by adding scores from 36 subcutaneous sites (0-144). Each regional score will be estimated by summing the site scores of the hands (0-8), arms (0-16), thoracic wall (0-32), abdominal wall (0-32), thigh (0-24), calves (0-24), and feet (0-8). The total regional score will be divided by the number of sites in each region to the average score (0-4). the lower the score = the lower level of edema.

on the day of admission , repeated every 2 days till death or discharge which come first .

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
co-relation of the change of any elements of body composition with poor outcomes suchs such as death, need for ventilatory or circulatory support or increase the length of stay in icu.
Time Frame: from occurence of change in body composition till the poor outcome. till discharge from icu or death which come first, assessed till 20 days from admission
Positive co-relation or negative correlation between both. That will be measured by the frequency of occurrence of poor clinical outcomes-mortality cardiorespiratory support or prolonged length of stay- in patients with positive change in any element (muscular-fat-extracellular edema).
from occurence of change in body composition till the poor outcome. till discharge from icu or death which come first, assessed till 20 days from admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

it will be available after completion and acceptance from a peer reviewed journal and upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

upon reasonable request from one of the authors.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on ultrasound detection of body composition

Subscribe