Shared Decision-Making for Determining Treatment Strategies in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer (MAeSTro-SDM)

April 27, 2025 updated by: National Cancer Center, Korea

Shared Decision-Making for Determining Treatment Strategies in Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: a Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in Korea. A parallel, two-group cluster-randomized design will be used to test whether the Shared decision-making Group (SDM; intervention) is different from the Standard Care Group (SC; control).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the group provided with a decision support tool for treatment planning (Intervention; SDM group) demonstrates improved satisfaction with the decision-making process compared to the group receiving standard care (Control; SC group) among patients diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer who need to determine their treatment plan.

The data are collected from patients who are diagnosed with low-risk PTC and Twenty doctors with various experience of AS will participate in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

310

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older with a thyroid nodule of 1.0 cm or less confirmed as Bethesda category V (suspicious for PTC) or VI (PTC) based on cytopathological examination, or Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance) with a confirmed BRAF V600E mutation.
  • Patients with no evidence of distant metastasis, cervical lymph node metastasis, recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, or tracheal invasion. Additionally, no evidence of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) should be present, and the tumor must not belong to high-risk subtypes of PTC (e.g., diffuse sclerosing, columnar cell, or solid subtype).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot undergo regular follow-up or are expected to have difficulties with follow-up.
  • Patients with indeterminate or benign findings on thyroid biopsy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SDM Group (Shared Decision-Making Group; Intervention Group)
  • Patients will receive detailed information, including an information leaflet about treatment options.
  • Clinicians will guide patients through a structured SDM protocol before finalizing the treatment decision.
Card news and Videos related to general knowledge and treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer
No Intervention: SC Group (Standard Care Group; Control Group)
- Patients will receive standard medical care following current clinical practices without the SDM protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision Conflict Scale: DCS
Time Frame: at enrollment
which assesses an individual's perception and understanding of decision-making by 16 items. The scale is 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree), and scores are calculated through a) summed, b) divided by 16, and c) multiplied by 25, and range from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).
at enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Quality of Life between the shared decision group and standard care group
Time Frame: at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
The Quality of Life - Thyroid (QOL-Thyroid) questionnaire was 30 items. These are assigned to four scales, each reflecting an aspect of QoL. Physical well-being is measured with two items and 13 questions, psychological well-being with 13 items and 22 questions, social concerns with eight items and 14 questions, and spiritual well-being with seven items and questions. Response options range from '0 = worst outcome' to '10 = best outcome' on an ordinal 11-point scale.
at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
Decision Regret Scale: DRS
Time Frame: at 6month, 12month after enrollment
measures distress and remorse after making a healthcare decision. Scale ranges from 1 (Strongly agree) to 5(Strongly Disagree). The final score, the items are summed and averaged. ranging from 0 (no regret) to 100 (high regret).
at 6month, 12month after enrollment
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Time Frame: at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
a nine-item questionnaire assessing the quality of SDM from both patient and clinician perspectives. Scale ranges from 1(completely disagree) to 6(completely agree). Higher scores are indicative of more SDM.
at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
Patients' Perceived involvement of Care Scale (PICS)
Time Frame: at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
a 13-item questionnaire evaluating patient engagement in primary care [12]. It measures Clinician's information provision, patient's proactive information-seeking, and patient participation in treatment decisions (5-point Likert scale; 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate lower clinician control and greater patient involvement in decision-making.
at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision making(Mappin'SDM)
Time Frame: at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
that incorporates physician, patient, and observer perspectives during medical consultations. a 15-item tool adapted from the 12-item OPTION scale to evaluate observed patient involvement in decision-making [13]. Each item consists of behavioral and outcome components (a total of 30 items), rated by patients, clinicians, and observers (through real-time or via video review). Scale ranges from 0(not at all) to 5(absolutely true). High scores indicate high quality of decision-making communication across patient engagement.
at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment
a 14-item tool (7 for anxiety, 7 for depression), developed to measure hospital patients' levels of anxiety and depression. Each item is rated on a 0-3 scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 per subscale. A cutoff score of 8 or higher indicates clinically significant symptoms, based on Korean validation studies.
at enrollment, and 6month, 12month after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Young Joo Park, Seoul National University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Eun Kyung Lee, National Cancer Center
  • Principal Investigator: Min Joo Kim, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Young Shin Song, SMC-SNU Boramae Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Kyong Yeun Jung, Nowon Eulji Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Shin Je Moon, Hanyang University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on SDM protocol

Subscribe