Influence of Intraoperative Nociception Guided Analgesia on Perioperative Total Analgesic Requirement Endometriosis (ENDONOL)

April 27, 2026 updated by: Prof Urs Zingg

Influence of Intraoperative Nociception Guided Analgesia on Perioperative Analgesia Consumption in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Resection of Endometriosis

Adequate analgesia in the perioperative setting is one of the most important pillars of anesthesiology. It is generally understood that poorly managed acute postoperative pain correlates with increased morbidity, prolonged recovery periods, extended opioid utilization, and serves as a predictor for chronic pain onset . On the other hand, the overuse of opioid-based analgesics during surgery may evoke respiratory depression, constipation, nausea, sedation, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia . Thus far, the lack of an objective intraoperative pain monitor has constrained anesthesia practitioners to rely on the interpretation of physiological cues such as tachycardia, hypertonia, and lacrimation as surrogate markers of pain (3). Variability in the educational background and clinical experience among providers may predispose to either excessive or inadequate administration of analgesics, consequently allowing for unfavorable postoperative outcomes. However, recent advancements have introduced novel devices for nociception measurement. Thus, a quantifiable assessment of nociception has become feasible. The most widely approved device is the Nociception Level (NOL®) index developed by Medasense in Israel. This index operates by discerning various sympathetic responses of the body to nociceptive stimuli and has been thoroughly tested on opioid-based analgesic regimens. The NOL® index uses a multiparametric approach including a random forest algorithm to measure the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic system activity. Recently, a strong correlation has been reported between the response of the NOL® index and analgesia during surgery.

Patients being scheduled for endometriosis surgery do have a significant history of chronic pain thus being more prone to postoperative complications and therefore will benefit the most from a tailored analgesic regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Adequate analgesia in the perioperative setting is one of the most important pillars of anaesthesiology. It is generally understood that poorly managed acute postoperative pain correlates with increased morbidity, prolonged recovery periods, extended opioid utilization, and serves as a predictor for chronic pain onset. On the other hand, the overuse of opioid-based analgesics during surgery may evoke respiratory depression, constipation, nausea, sedation, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Thus far, the lack of an objective intraoperative pain monitor has constrained anaesthesia practitioners to rely on the interpretation of physiological cues such as tachycardia, hypertonia, and lacrimation as surrogate markers of pain. Variability in the educational background and clinical experience among providers may predispose to either excessive or inadequate administration of analgesics, consequently allowing for unfavorable postoperative outcomes. However, recent advancements have introduced novel devices for nociception measurement. Thus, a quantifiable assessment of nociception has become feasible. The most widely approved device is the Nociception Level (NOL®) index developed by Medasense in Israel. This index operates by discerning various sympathetic responses of the body to nociceptive stimuli and has been thoroughly tested on opioid-based analgesic regimens. The NOL® index uses a multiparametric approach including a random forest algorithm to measure the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic system activity. Recently, a strong correlation has been reported between the response of the NOL® index and analgesia during surgery.

Patients being scheduled for endometriosis surgery do have a significant history of chronic pain thus being more prone to postoperative complications and therefore will benefit the most from a tailored analgesic regimen. Patients' existing analgesic regimen, typically comprising Paracetamol, NSAIDs, and Metamizol, will be carefully documented during preoperative anesthetic consultations and taken into account in the study protocols.

Preoperatively, patients will be staged by their gynecologists using the ENZIAN classification. The ENZIAN classification is a diagnostic system for endometriosis that covers various localizations and forms of the disease. It enables a standardized assessment for both non-invasive and invasive diagnostic procedures. The classification considers specific compartments and uses standardized coding for the severity and location of lesions. The classification is performed preoperatively using ultrasound diagnostics as well as intraoperatively and is annotated with the lower-case letters: (s)= Surgical, (u)= Ultrasound (Keckstein J, 2021). Thereby, a comprehensive picture of the disease is obtained. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis requires a more invasive procedure, a longer operating time and a higher consumption of analgesics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Canton of Zurich
      • Schlieren, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, 8952
        • Spital Limmattal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Premenopausal females
  • Undergoes any type of laparoscopic surgery for suspected endometriosis or adenomyosis (diagnostic/therapeutic and/or hysterectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Patients with contraindications for opioids and/or ketamine/clonidine (standard medications)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Lack of ability to follow the study procedure, e.g. due to severe language barriers, mental disorders, dementia
  • Patients requiring preoperative or postoperative treatment in the intensive care unit
  • Patients with conditions precluding the use of the NOL® sensor, such as neuromuscular deficits affecting hand function
  • Regular consumption of opioids (Mankoski Score ≥6)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will undergo standard treatment for laparoscopic endometriosis/adenomyosis surgery at Spital Limmattal. Although the control group will not be using NOL®-monitoring to guide analgesic requirement, the monitor will be installed with a blinded screen to investigate whether our multimodal anesthesia model is in coherence with values between 10 and 25. The anesthesia care team will not be able to see the values during surgery in order to tailor analgesic requirement only by conventional clinical judgement.
Experimental: nociception guided treatment
For the nociception level-guided group the same standard narcosis will be applied whilst ensuring that the NOL® level value will be maintained between 10 and 25.
For the nociception level-guided group the same standard narcosis will be applied whilst ensuring that the NOL® level value will be maintained between 10 and 25.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total analgestic requirement
Time Frame: Start of anaesthesia until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)..
Total analgesic requirement. Intra- and postoperative medication administration will be systematically documented throughout until two hours after arrival at the recovery room or until the patient has been discharged from the recovery room.
Start of anaesthesia until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)..

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores in PACU
Time Frame: Start Start at arrival in the recovery room until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)
Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. The NRS icludes values from 0 to 10 (indicating no pain at 0 and maximized pain at 10, which is a worse outcome). The NRS score will be assessed every 15 minutes starting with arrival at the recovery room until 2 hours after admission or until the patient has been discharged from the recovery room.
Start Start at arrival in the recovery room until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)
Total length of Stay in the PACU (min)
Time Frame: Start at arrival in the recovery room until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)
Start at arrival in the recovery room until discharge from the recovery room (max. lenghth of stay in the recovery 2 hours)
Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at discharge
Time Frame: Immediately postoperatively until discharge (1-3 days).
Postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at discharge (indicating no pain at 0 and maximized pain at 10, which is a worse outcome) will be assessed every 15 minutes starting with arrival at the recovery room until 2 hours after admission or until the patient has been discharged from the recovery room. One more NRS assessement will be made at discharge.
Immediately postoperatively until discharge (1-3 days).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Isabel Marcolino, Dr. med., Spital STS AG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioperative Analgesia in Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on nociception guided treatment

Subscribe