Dietary Advice Training in Nursing Using Simulation and Interactive Fiction

December 11, 2024 updated by: Antonio Jesús Marín Paz, University of Cadiz

Dietary Advice Training in Nursing Using Simulation and Interactive Fiction: a Randomised Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of training nursing students using interactive fiction and role-play simulations as teaching methodologies in improving learning and decision-making competencies related to dietary advice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cadiz
      • Algeciras, Cadiz, Spain, 11207
        • Faculty of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First year of the Degree in Nursing at a Spanish university who were enrolled in the subject "Food, Nutrition and Dietetics".

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of attendance since the beginning of the course.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group 1 (EG1)
Participants received a multimodal intervention (intervention order: interactive fiction activities and role-play simulation).
The case studies were prepared using interactive fiction through Twine. Each case simulated a nursing consultation with a patient requiring dietary advice, and the patient's evolution depended on the students' choices. All cases created had similar structures, durations, and difficulties to avoid complexity-related bias. For each circumstance, three possible dietary advice options were offered to the patient: one option that would be ideal, one suitable option, and one unsuitable option.
Role-play activity of the nursing consultation on dietary advice according to Nemec et al. (2021) recommendations. Ten case studies of a nursing consultation on dietary advice involving a nurse and a patient were designed with the consensus of a group of nursing professionals with expertise in food and nutrition, health literacy, and communication. Each student was assigned a role and provided with the necessary information to play their character or understand their patient's context. The information provided was different according to the role assigned. They had to perform a simulation of eight minutes, similar to the time available in the student's primary care consultations in the referral health system. Thus, the patient and the family member had to explain the situation or health problem, the professional would analyse it, and together, they would try to reach a therapeutic agreement. After the consultation, a debriefing was carried out.
Experimental: Experimental Group 2 (EG2)
Participants received a multimodal intervention (intervention order: role-play simulation and interactive fiction activities).
The case studies were prepared using interactive fiction through Twine. Each case simulated a nursing consultation with a patient requiring dietary advice, and the patient's evolution depended on the students' choices. All cases created had similar structures, durations, and difficulties to avoid complexity-related bias. For each circumstance, three possible dietary advice options were offered to the patient: one option that would be ideal, one suitable option, and one unsuitable option.
Role-play activity of the nursing consultation on dietary advice according to Nemec et al. (2021) recommendations. Ten case studies of a nursing consultation on dietary advice involving a nurse and a patient were designed with the consensus of a group of nursing professionals with expertise in food and nutrition, health literacy, and communication. Each student was assigned a role and provided with the necessary information to play their character or understand their patient's context. The information provided was different according to the role assigned. They had to perform a simulation of eight minutes, similar to the time available in the student's primary care consultations in the referral health system. Thus, the patient and the family member had to explain the situation or health problem, the professional would analyse it, and together, they would try to reach a therapeutic agreement. After the consultation, a debriefing was carried out.
No Intervention: Control Group (CG)
Participants received a conventional practical teaching based on lectures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning
Time Frame: Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
The assessment of the learning level during the intervention was measured by correcting the three unpublished case studies created using the interactive fiction methodology. Each case study consisted of 6 questions with 3 possible answers (1 point for the ideal answer, 0.5 points for the adequate answer and 0 points for the inadequate answer). For readability, the final scores were reconverted proportionally out of 10 before statistical analysis.
Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Decision-making
Time Frame: Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Measurement instrument: Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS). It comprises the search for options or alternatives, information seeking and unbiased assimilation of new information, evaluation and re-evaluation of consequences, and probing of goals and values.
Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Quality of simulations
Time Frame: Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Measurement instrument: Simulation Design Scale (SDS). This scale measures students' perceptions of 5 dimensions related to simulation design: information, support, problem-solving, guided feedback and fidelity.
Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enjoyable experience
Time Frame: Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Measurement instrument: Gameful Experience Gamification (GAMEX) scale. It measures 6 dimensions of students' experience in gamified experiences or environments involving interactive enjoyment mechanisms.
Pre-test (0 day), Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)
Measurement instrument: Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS). It has 5 items on student satisfaction with instructional methods, learning materials and instructors, as well as 8 items on self-confidence in learning.
Post-test 1 (30th day), and Post-test 2 (60th day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Antonio-Jesús Marín-Paz, PhD, University of Cadiz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data generated and teaching materials created for the interventions.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Unending.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All data from this study will be available upon request to the author by correspondence, under justified reasons. The teaching material created for the interventions will be deposited in the university's institutional repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation Training

Clinical Trials on Interactive fiction activities

Subscribe