Feasibility Study of Caregiver-Assist Strategy Training

February 13, 2025 updated by: Feng-Hang Chang, Taipei Medical University

Optimizing Activity Performance of Stroke Patients Through Caregiver-Assisted Rehabilitation With Strategy Training: A Feasibility Study

The goal of this study is to examine the feasibility of delivering an innovative intervention, caregiver-assisted strategy training (CaST), targeting enhancing activity functions in community-dwelling adults after stroke. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is CaST acceptable to stroke survivors with functional limitations?
  • Does CaST show positive effects on functional outcomes?

Researchers will compare the CaST program to a control education program to investigate the interventional effect size for the selected stroke participants.

Participants will:

  • Receive CAST or an education program 1 to 2 sessions per week until finishing 10 sessions.
  • Be assessed clinical outcomes at 4 times: pre-intervention, post-intervention, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up.
  • Be interviewed once after finishing their intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

To address post-stroke activity limitations, intensive task-oriented rehabilitation is widely recommended across clinical guidelines. The caregiver is potentially able to play a facilitative role during the rehabilitation process. However, the best way to integrate caregivers into task-oriented rehabilitation is largely unknown. To address this gap, this preliminary study aims to assess the feasibility of a newly developed intervention, caregiver-assisted strategy training (CaST), in enhancing the activity performance of stroke survivors.

A mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) design, including a repeated measures design, is used in this feasibility study. A procedure of randomization with minimization will be conducted by a researcher who is independent of the investigation and outcome assessments. Eligible stroke survivors and their caregivers will be recruited from collaborative hospitals in Northern Taiwan and randomly assigned with even possibility. Longitudinal evaluations will be conducted at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), 3-month (T3), and 6-month (T4) follow-ups. Standardized assessments such as the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AMPAC), the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) will be used to assess outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. The feasibility indicators, such as recruitment rates and intervention attendance and adherence, will be evaluated by questionnaires, field notes, and qualitative interviews after the interventions are completed. Quantitative data will be analyzed using multiple linear regression models and mixed-effects regression models. Furthermore, qualitative in-depth interviews with participants, caregivers, and therapists will be conducted post-intervention. These interviews will explore experiences, satisfaction, and perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Transcribed data will undergo coding by two independent coders and subsequent analysis through the thematic analysis method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Feng-Heng Chang, ScD
  • Phone Number: 16040 +886-2-66202589
  • Email: ipc@tmu.edu.tw

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
        • Contact:
      • Taipei City, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Taipei City, Taiwan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being willing to provide informed consent
  • Diagnosis with ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ranges from 2 to 4
  • Rehabilitation frequency less than 3 days per week
  • Having a healthy caregiver

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing palliative care
  • Major diseases or severe conditions influencing study participation, such as global aphasia, dementia, multiple organ failure, immobilization due to fracture, etc Moderate post-stroke cognitive impairment, with Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <22
  • Pre-stroke mRS > 1
  • Participating in other interventional study concurrently.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Caregiver-Assisted Strategy Training
Trained therapists visit each participant once or twice weekly for 60 minutes per visit. In a total of 10 sessions over a maximum of 10 weeks, CaST program includes the following active ingredients: self-selected activity-based goals, dynamic performance analysis, global strategy ("Goal-PlanDo-Check"), massed practice, variable practice, increasing task difficulty, explicit and implicit feedback, guided discovery, action observation, and social interaction.
CaST is a home-based rehabilitation that guides both stroke survivors and their caregivers to implement strategy training for addressing real-life limitations after stroke. During the intervention, the caregiver not only supervises the participant but also co-participates in the practice by instructing on when and how to be an assistant and facilitator when the stroke survivor executes their practice plan.
Other Names:
  • CaST
Sham Comparator: Education
Participants receive a dose-matched stroke education with 10 visits by well-trained research staff through face-to-face talks.
Stroke-related information and knowledge that includes stroke subtypes and their etiology, risk factors of primary and secondary stroke, healthy lifestyles, common sequela, and adaptive skills for impaired functions are provided.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Outpatient Short Forms
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
The AM-PAC measures the difficulty is performing three activity domains: Basic Mobility (18 activities), Daily Activity (15 activities), and Applied Cognition (19 activities) on a 4-point scale. In this trial, Applied Cognition domain is viewed as a secondary outcome. A trained research assistant performs AM-PAC face-to-face with participants. We determine the AM-PAC as the primary outcome due to its effect size from the between-group comparison will be used in developing the further efficacy trial.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
PM-3D4D consists of 24 items for evaluating three domains of participation, which are community, productivity, and social. Participants will be asked to rate all items on the four distinct dimensions: (1) diversity, (2) frequency, (3) desire for change, and (4) perceived difficulty. A trained research assistant performs PM-3D4D face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) is a self-reported measurement that assesses participants' health-related quality of life across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. In each domain, the assessment utilizes three levels to indicate the extent of problem: no problem, moderate problems, and extreme problems. A trained research assistant performs EQ-5D-3L face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaires (SSEQ)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
SSEQ measures individual confidence in functional performance after stroke [64]. It contains 13 items, and each item is rated on a 10-point scalar from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident). A trained research assistant performs SSEQ face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
FMA measures the motor impairments of hemiplegia and includes a proximal subscale of upper extremity (0-42 points) for the shoulder/elbow/forearm, distal subscale of upper extremity (0-24 points) for the wrist/hand, and a lower extremity subscale (0-34 points) A trained research assistant performs FMA face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
MoCA with 30 items evaluates the cognitive functions. This assessment covers domains such as visuospatial/executive skills, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. A trained research assistant performs MoCA face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Goal Attainment Scale
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
GAS is used to quantify the achievement of goals. A trained research assistant performs GAS face-to-face with participants.
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the end of intervention, 5 to 10 weeks from the baseline
To quantify the participants' satisfaction about the intervention
At the end of intervention, 5 to 10 weeks from the baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
NIHSS is used to indicate participants' stroke severity before intervention
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
BBS is used to indicate participants' balance function before intervention
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
HADS is used to indicate participants' mood status before intervention
At baseline, within 4 weeks after enrollment
modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)
mRS is used to indicate participants' global disability
4 time points: baseline (T1), from baseline to the end of intervention at 5-10 weeks (T2), from the end of intervention to 3-month follow-up (T3), from the end of intervention to 6-month follow-up (T4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Feng-Heng Chang, ScD, Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Caregiver-Assist Strategy Training

Subscribe