- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06750107
Testing the Efficacy of Safe South Africa
June 1, 2026 updated by: Caroline Kuo, Brown University
Testing the Efficacy of Safe South Africa: An Intervention to Prevent HIV Risk and Interpersonal Violence Among Adolescent Boys
In this study, investigators will examine the efficacy of Safe South Africa, a behavioral intervention that is developmentally- and gender-tailored to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescent boys.
South Africa faces some of the highest global rates of HIV and IPV with sustained high incidence of HIV and alarming rates of IPV among adolescents and thus, is an ideal site to advance prevention science to tackle these urgent public health priorities.
Testing the efficacy of an integrated intervention to prevent HIV risk behavior and IPV for adolescent boys can support optimal health for young people, their future partners, and society.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Adolescence presents an ideal developmental transition period for an integrated intervention targeting prevention of HIV risk behaviors and intimate partner violence (IPV), including sexual violence.
Adolescent boys in particular are at high risk for HIV and perpetration of IPV.
Yet, few behavioral interventions integrate HIV-IPV prevention and are tailored for the unique developmental needs of adolescent boys.
In this study, investigators build on previous scientific work that demonstrated the acceptability and feasibility of Safe South Africa, an integrated HIV-IPV intervention that uses a developmentally- and gender-tailored approach grounded in social norms theory to prevent adolescent HIV risk behavior and IPV.
Investigators will conduct the work in South Africa, a country with the largest HIV epidemic and some of the highest rates of IPV in the world.
The investigative team propose the following specific aims: (1) Tailoring Safe South Africa intervention content to address the unique behavioral and social norms data that drives HIV and IPV behaviors among boys in their socioecological environments.
(2) Testing the efficacy of the Safe South Africa intervention in preventing HIV/STIs and reducing IPV frequency among N=836 adolescent boys (ages 15- 17), with the scientific team's working hypothesis that the intervention, relative to the usual care condition, will show (a) lower incidence of any STI (including HIV); and (b) reductions in IPV perpetration frequency and decreased endorsement of IPV supportive attitudes.
(3) Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing Safe South Africa within a school setting to provide data for future dissemination (presuming Safe South Africa is efficacious).
Investigators will examine processes critical to future dissemination through (a) fidelity data examining adherence to core active components of the standardized intervention manual guiding consistent delivery of the intervention; and (b) qualitative data on the experience during and post-implementation from adolescents and stakeholders using N=20 in-depth interviews with each group.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
836
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cape Town, South Africa
- Schools in Cape Town area
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- identification as boys
- ages 15-17 years
- enrolled at public high schools in South Africa situated in communities with high rates of HIV and violence
Exclusion Criteria:
- does not have written parental consent
- does not have written assent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Behavioral Intervention Safe South Africa
This experimental behavioral intervention is designed to (a) lower incidence of sexually transmitted infections (gonorrhea, chlamydia and HIV); and (b) reductions in Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) perpetration frequency and decreased endorsement of IPV supportive attitudes
|
The Safe South Africa intervention is a developmentally-tailored intervention for adolescent boys, designed to reduce actual or intended HIV risk behaviors, actual or intended IPV perpetration frequency, and endorsement of IPV supportive attitudes.
This intervention comprises 2-hour sessions, held once a week for a total of two weeks.
The intervention also includes take-home activities to deepen behavioral engagement with received sessions and to "prime the pump" for up-coming sessions.
Part 2 involves behavioral practice, including bystander intervention techniques.
|
|
No Intervention: Control of Standard Care
The control arm will receive standard care.
In South Africa, at the time of study planning there are no integrated HIV-IPV interventions that are evidence-based for this age group so the control group will not receive anything, reflective of what would be standard care in this setting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reduction in incidence of HIV and or Chlamydia and or Gonorrhoeae
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Biologically verified Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or HIV are measured as incident infections, defined as the number of participants in the sample who newly acquire HIV and/or Chlamydia and/or Gonorrhoeae as compared to the prior timepoint (this compares 12 month data to baseline).
Chlamydia and Gonorrhoeae will be measured using urine sample using an assay (Discharge Multiplex PCR).
HIV samples will be captured using a sterile single-person pricking tool is used to create a five dried blood spots card.
Samples are tested using a 4th generation assay (Biorad Genscreen ULTRA HIV Ag-Ab assay).
|
12 months
|
|
Reduction in acts of intimate partner violence
Time Frame: 12 months
|
For those who have engaged in intimate touching, self-reported data on the number of completed acts of forced touching, oral sex, anal sex, and vaginal sex, as well as attempted acts of forced oral, anal, and vaginal sex are collecting using the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) Short Form Perpetration (SES-SFP) is a survey tool developed by Mary P. Koss (Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2007).
Revising the SES: A Collaborative Process to Improve Assessment of Sexual Aggression and Victimization.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357-370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x).
The number of participants who have engaged in one or more acts of completed or attempted forced touching are reported at the 12 month timepoint, as compared to prior timepoints.
|
12 months
|
|
Lower proportion of those who have reduced endorsement of intimate partner violence supportive attitudes
Time Frame: 12 months
|
For those who have engaged in intimate touching, self-reported data on endorsement of IPV supportive attitudes will be measured using the Rape Myth Acceptance Scale.
At 12 months, we will compare the proportion of individuals who will lower their Rape Myth Acceptance (RMA) score between baseline and twelve months.
The Rape Myth Acceptance Scale is: • Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF.
Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale.
Journal of Research in Personality 1999;33:27-68.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Caroline Kuo, American University and Brown University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 22, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 30, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
April 30, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 19, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
December 27, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 3, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 1, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- R01MH129161 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Other researchers may request de-identified data and this will be shared after final analysis of outcomes is complete.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After analysis of outcomes is complete, other researchers can request de-identified data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers should describe how they want to use the data and all investigative team members must agree to release.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intervention
-
University of HaifaCompletedPsychological Intervention | Internet-Based Intervention | Intervention StudyIsrael
-
Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General HospitalRecruitingMusic Listening Intervention | Mindfulness-based InterventionCanada
-
Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.CompletedBrief Video-based Intervention | Vignette Based Intervention | Non Intervention Control ArmUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Leeds Beckett UniversityCompleted
-
Zhejiang UniversityCompleted
-
Matrouh UniversityCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingIntervention | ControlHong Kong
-
Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Safe South Africa
-
Brown UniversityRhode Island Hospital; Medical Research Council, South AfricaCompletedSexual Behavior | Intimate Partner ViolenceSouth Africa
-
Brown UniversityCompletedPrevention or Reduction of HIV Risk Behavior | Prevention or Reduction of Intimate Partner ViolenceSouth Africa
-
Penn State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Sexually Transmitted DiseasesSouth Africa
-
University of MichiganUniversity of California, San Francisco; Human Sciences Research CouncilActive, not recruitingHuman Immunodeficiency VirusSouth Africa
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Aptissen SAAzidus BrasilCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, KneeBrazil
-
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion...Active, not recruitingDiet, Healthy | Diet Habit | Nutrition, Healthy | Dietary ExposureMexico
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
AbbottCompletedProstatic NeoplasmBelgium, Luxembourg
-
Mondelēz International, Inc.KGK Science Inc.Completed