Optimizing OR Simulation in MEDI 045: Bias Reduction and Strategic Improvements (OPTIMIST) (OPTIMIST)

December 20, 2024 updated by: Walid Mohamed Ragab Mohamed Badwi

OPTIMIST Optimizing OR Simulation in MEDI 045 Anesthesia Program: Trends, Bias Reduction, and Strategic Improvements and Shaping Future Practices OPTIMIST

This study explores the evolving landscape of operating room (OR) simulation by identifying key trends, addressing potential biases, and providing actionable recommendations for improvement. Using data-driven analysis, the research uncovers patterns in skill development and decision-making, offering insights into the effectiveness of current OR simulation programs. The study also tackles biases in data collection, including selection and response bias, ensuring the reliability of findings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The effectiveness of simulation training is crucial in medical education, particularly for skills retention and perceived effectiveness. This section evaluates the overall effectiveness of SimMan3G sessions in enhancing clinical skills among participants.

Objectives

  • To analyze the correlation between the number of SimMan3G sessions and skill retention.
  • To assess the perceived effectiveness of simulation training.
  • To provide actionable recommendations for improving simulation training effectiveness.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11461
        • King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), College of Medicine
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11461-7805-41
        • King Saud University MedicalCity
      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11461
        • King Saud University , College of Medicine, Anesthesia Department
    • Riydh
      • Riyadh, Riydh, Saudi Arabia, 11461-7805-41
        • King Saud University MedicalCity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of medical trainees enrolled in the MEDI 045 anesthesia program at King Saud Medical City.

Participants will include individuals with varying levels of clinical experience who are eligible for simulation-based training.

Participants will be randomly selected from a list of eligible trainees in the MEDI 045 program.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants enrolled in the MEDI 045 anesthesia program at King Saud Medical City.
  • Medical students or trainees with prior exposure to basic clinical simulation.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Willingness to participate in simulation-based training sessions.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with prior advanced simulation training in anesthesia.
  • Individuals with documented cognitive impairments or learning disabilities that may interfere with the study tasks.
  • Refuse to participate in post-simulation assessments or follow-ups.
  • Lack of fluency in the language of instruction used in the simulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Bias in Clinical Decision-Making
Time Frame: Immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) Over 6 months post-training

Evaluate the change in cognitive bias during simulated clinical scenarios using the Cognitive Bias Assessment Tool (CBAT). This tool assesses the presence of cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, anchoring bias) in decision-making.

The unit of measure will be the percentage of bias-free decisions or correct decisions made by participants, based on the CBAT scoring system.

The assessment will occur immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) and again 6 months post-training to measure both immediate and long-term changes in cognitive bias.

Immediately after simulation training (within 1 day) Over 6 months post-training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medical Education

Subscribe