The Influence of Combining the Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver with Active Gas Aspiration on Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Patients Having a Gynecologic Laparoscopy, Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

December 22, 2024 updated by: Mahmoud Essam Salama Hammam, Assiut University
Laparoscopy is among the most used minimally invasive procedures that can reduce postoperative pain, lessen the duration of hospital stay and facilitate recovery. Laparoscopy has been widely used in various abdominal surgeries, such as gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia and gynecological surgery . However, the post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) often occurs following laparoscopic surgeries, and its reported incidence varies from 35-80% This study aims to assess the effect of combining pulmonary recruitment maneuvers (PRM) with active gas aspiration on post-laparoscopic shoulder pain in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The PLSP can even remain for up to three days and often upsets the patients . Moreover, it can increase the costs of healthcare owing to an increased usage of analgesics, delayed discharge, and even re-admission .

Therefore, necessary measures should be taken to diminish the intensity of PLSP. Although the exact mechanism of PLSP remains unclear, some studies have suggested that it is caused by the trapping of carbon dioxide (CO2) between the liver and the right diaphragm and subsequent conversion into carbonic acid, which irritates the diaphragm and subsequently generates referred shoulder pain (C4 dermatomal) . Therefore, several studies have attempted to decrease the incidence or severity of PLSP by promoting the removal of remaining CO2 from the abdominal cavity. These efforts include drainage tube insertion, intraperitoneal saline instillation (IPSI), and the usage of intraperitoneal local anesthetic agents . More-over, the pulmonary recruitment maneuver (PRM) can also facilitate the removal of CO2 from the abdominal cavity by increasing positive airway pressure and intrathoracic pressure. PRM is more commonly used in clinical practice because it does not require drugs, specialized apparatus, or additional medical costs, unlike the other methods . Several trials have described the advantages of PRM in patients undergoing laparoscopic operations compared to passive abdominal compression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Mahmoud Essam Salama Hammam, resident doctor
  • Phone Number: +201098209345‬‬‬‬
  • Email: mahmoudhamam98@icloud.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age 18- 65 years.

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) I - II
    • scheduled for an elective gyncologic laparoscopic procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Urgent or emergency case.

    • ASA classification more than III.
    • Age less than 16 years.
    • Reduced left and right ventricular function (ejection fraction <40%).
    • Previous respiratory disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive lung disease, or had a history of thoracic or shoulder surgery
    • Patient conversion to a laparotomy.
    • the operation time is more than 3 h

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group 1
The surgeon will be instructed to actively aspirate the intraperitoneal CO2 gas
surgeon will be instructed to actively aspirate the intraperitoneal CO2 gas
Experimental: group 2
The surgeon will be instructed to apply PRM pressures. patients will receive the PRM which consisted of five manual pulmonary inflations,
patients will receive the PRM which consisted of five manual pulmonary inflations, where each positive pressure inflation will be done for 5 s at a maximum pressure of 30 cm H2O, manually by using the APL valve in the anesthesia machine. The patient will be in a Trendelenburg position (30°). The fifth positive pressure inflation lasted for approximately 5 s. During that time, the patient will be closely monitored, while the anesthesiologist performed PRM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-laparoscopic shoulder pain by VAS score
Time Frame: 24 hours
post-laparoscopic shoulder pain by VAS score
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • pulm recruit gas aspir Gyn lap

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Laparoscopic Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on active gas aspiration

Subscribe