Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions

January 25, 2025 updated by: Alvaro Babiano Nodal, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Gingival recession (GR) is a common oral health problem that causes sensitivity, esthetic concerns and hygiene problems. Successful root coverage can be achieved by various surgical techniques. The VISTA technique may overcome some of the limitations of other techniques and present equal results to techniques that are considered the "Gold Standard" in this area of periodontology.

The objective of the research is to study the VISTA technique in terms of complete root coverage, % root coverage, gingival thickness gain, bleeding on probing, keratinized gingival width, PROMS, vestibular depth and esthetic results.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults: men and women between 18 and 75 years of age.
  • Accepts and signs informed consent.
  • Systemically healthy patients with periodontal health or controlled periodontitis.
  • Presence of at least two maxillary Cairo Type I or II (RT1/2) recessions > 2 mm deep on buccal aspect.
  • Plaque index ≤20%
  • No previous periodontal surgeries performed.
  • Presence of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), a 1 mm step in the CEJ and/or presence of root abrasion, but with an identifiable CEJ will be accepted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoker of 10 ≥ cigarettes per day.
  • Contraindications to periodontal surgery.
  • Medications that affect the gingiva or their healing.
  • Active orthodontic treatment.
  • Pregnant women
  • Caries or restorations in the area to be treated.
  • Patients who cannot follow the post-surgical medication adequately

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TEST
VISTA TECHNIQUE

The VISTA (Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access) technique is a minimally invasive surgical approach for root coverage. A single vertical incision is made, often at the labial frenulum for optimal access, reaching the periosteum to elevate a subperiosteal tunnel. This tunnel is extended beyond the mucogingival junction and interproximally under each papilla to enable tension-free coronal repositioning of the gingiva.

An autologous connective tissue graft, harvested and de-epithelialized from the palate, is introduced into the tunnel. Before placement, teeth are etched (orthophosphoric or hydrofluoric acid depending on surface type). Sutures (6-0 polypropylene) stabilize the graft, with additional composite fixation on treated teeth. The vertical incision is closed using 5-0 sutures, ensuring proper stabilization and healing. This approach minimizes trauma, promotes healing, and achieves effective root coverage.

Experimental: Control
Coronally Advanced Technique

The Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) is an effective technique for root coverage in single or multiple gingival recession cases with adequate apical keratinized tissue thickness and height. Following the De Sanctis and Zucchelli protocol (2007), two horizontal incisions are made 3 mm apart, with placement 1 mm apical to the recession height. Vertical beveled incisions extend into the alveolar mucosa, and a flap is elevated in three stages: partial thickness at the papilla, full thickness to the buccal bone table, and apical partial thickness to release muscle fibers for mobility.

An autologous connective tissue graft (≥1 mm thick) is harvested from the palatal or retromolar area, de-epithelialized, and shaped to the recession size. The anatomical papillae are de-epithelialized, and the graft is sutured apically to the CEJ using 6-0 Polyglactin 910. Sling sutures (6-0 polypropylene) stabilize the flap 2 mm coronally to the CEJ, ensuring optimal positioning and healing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recession reduction (RR)
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after the surgery
Measured with a periodontal probe and with a STL file
3 months and 6 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PPD
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
distance from the gingival margin to the base of the gingival sulcus
Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
CAL
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
distance from the LAC to the base of the gingival sulcus
Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
KTW
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival line (MGL
Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
mean root coverage (% RC)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after the surgery
Measured with a periodontal probe and with a STL file
3 and 6 months after the surgery
Gingival thickness
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
Distance from the most external part of the gingiva to the buccal plate. Measured with a periodontal probe and with a STL file
Baseline, 3 and 6 months after the surgery
Complete root coverage
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after the surgery
Measured with a periodontal probe and with a STL file
3 and 6 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Recessions

Clinical Trials on Vestibular incision subperiostal tunnel technique

Subscribe