Outcome of Accessory Rods and Ilic Fixation for Distal Augmentation of S1 Fixation

January 3, 2025 updated by: Ebram Eissa Moussa, Assiut University
To assess radiological and clinical outcome of use of accessory rod and iliac fixation for distal augmentation of L1 fixation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar fusion is a surgical procedure that can be utilized to treat a variety of painful and degenerative conditions in the lower back. The most common conditions that indicate the need for an L5 S1 fusion include low back disc degeneration (also known as spondylolisthesis), spinal fractures, recurrent disc herniation, scoliosis, lumbar canal stenosis, and instability resulting from failed spine surgery . The success rate of lumbo sacral fusion surgery is influenced by many factors. These include non-union, hardware breakage or loosening, discitis, osteoporosis, tumors, and pseudoarthrosis . Lumbosacral pseudarthrosis is one of the most common complications in L5 S1 fusion surgery. It is a strong indication for revision surgery if severe symptoms persist. The rate of pseudarthrosis increases based on several parameters, including the number of levels fused, the type of fusion, and medical risk factors for pseudarthrosis .

There are various methods of revision. One such method involves the use of iliac screws in addition to lumbo sacral interbody fusion. This approach improves the outcomes of revision fusion surgery but still carries the risk of rod breakage . S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws have been described as another method, but they have some disadvantages like rod breakage, screw misplacement, breach of cortical bone, and injury to neurovascular structures. These structures include superior gluteal vessels, external iliac vessels, pudendal vessels, superior gluteal nerves, sciatic nerve, and sympathetic chain ganglia . Our theory proposes the use of an accessory rod, which offers the advantage of dual rod fixation with a low incidence of rod breakage. We also suggest the free-handed placement of the iliac screw in the iliac bone, which plays a significant role in improving the integrity of the fixation and simplifies the application process.

Multiple-rod constructs could prevent rod breakage and pseudarthrosis while also lowering the revision rate. As a result, they could lead to a better clinical outcome than the 2-rod construct. This approach is based on the principle that increasing the number of rods in the construct can distribute the load more evenly, reducing the risk of rod breakage and pseudarthrosis. This, in turn, could lead to a lower revision rate and better clinical outcomes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Asyut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut University
        • Contact:
          • Amany Omar, Vice dean of graduate studies
          • Phone Number: +20 +2088 22080150
          • Email: vp_grad@aun.edu.eg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study will include all patients who were admitted to the spine unit and needed extension of fixation for L5 S1 fusion due to failed previous surgery, instability, or degenerative changes ,infection, tumors and pseudoarthrosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The study excludes patients who are less than 18 years and more than 90 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: A case series of patients who underwent extension of fixation for L5 S1 fusion
patients who were admitted to the spine unit and needed extension of fixation for L5 S1 fusion due to failed previous surgery, instability, or degenerative changes ,infection, tumors and pseudoarthrosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Outcome of accessory rod and iliac fixation for distal augmentation of S1 fixation
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative: Initial assessment of the union. 1 year post-operative: Follow-up to confirm sustained union and assess long-term outcomes.
Union of L5 S1: This outcome is assessed by the presence of bridging bone across the fusion site, evaluated through X-ray imaging.
3 months post-operative: Initial assessment of the union. 1 year post-operative: Follow-up to confirm sustained union and assess long-term outcomes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Relief
Time Frame: Preoperative: VAS scores will be recorded before the surgery. Immediate Postoperative: VAS scores will be recorded immediately after the surgery. 3 Months Postoperative: VAS scores will be recorded to evaluate changes in pain intensity.
his will be assessed by comparing the preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of each patient. The VAS scores will be recorded before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and at 3 months post-operative to evaluate changes in pain intensity.
Preoperative: VAS scores will be recorded before the surgery. Immediate Postoperative: VAS scores will be recorded immediately after the surgery. 3 Months Postoperative: VAS scores will be recorded to evaluate changes in pain intensity.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • accessory rods and iliac screw

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbosacral

Clinical Trials on accessory rod and iliac fixation for distal augmentation for S1 fixation.

Subscribe